This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's?



On Jun 20, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Sergei Organov wrote:


Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:

On Jun 20, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Sergei Organov wrote:

so SYMBOL_FLAG_SMALL (flags 0x6 vs 0x2) is somehow being missed when -O1

is turned on. Seems to be something at tree-to-RTX conversion time.
Constant folding?

No, it would mean that the target says that this is not a small data.
Also try it with the following code and you will see there is no difference:


double osvf() { return 314314314; }

There is no difference in the sense that here both -O0 and -O1 behave roughly the same. So the problem is with detecting "smallness" for true constants by the target, right?

I think the bug is in rs6000_elf_in_small_data_p but since I have not debuged it yet I don't know for sure.

Could you file a bug? This is a target bug.

-- Pinski


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]