Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's?

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>]

On Jun 20, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Sergei Organov wrote:

> 2. The resulting assembly is different from what I get with -O1 and
>    doesn't contain the mis-optimization I'm trying to debug though it
>    doesn't seem to have anything to do with loops. For reference, the
>    code I'm trying to compile is:
>
>         extern double const osv;
>         double const osv = 314314314;
>         double osvf() { return osv; }

I don't see anything wrong with what it gives for -O0 and -O2.

-- Pinski