This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions

From: R Hill <dirtyepic dot sk at gmail dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 02:31:11 -0600
Subject: Re: Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions
References: <42A3F4CF.8030209@google.com> <200506060915.06779.rene@exactcode.de>
Reply-to: dirtyepic dot sk at gmail dot com

René Rebe wrote:

I think this massive -Os regressions on C++ code as experienced in tramp3d and botan should be investigated. However I have not looked for filled PRs or more recnt snapshots of 4.0 so far ...

Oh good, so it's not just me. ;)

I opened PR21314 a while back but ended up chickening out. I'm really new to this and since they couldn't reproduce it I figured the problem was on my end and closed the report. I also think it may be a dupe of PR21529, but I don't know enough to confirm that.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21529

--de.

References:
- Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions
  - From: Daniel Kegel
- Re: Tracking down gcc-4.0 performance regressions
  - From: René Rebe

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]