gcc archive
date index for June, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2005
23:55 gcc-4.0-20050630 is now available gccadmin
23:29 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
23:26 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
23:25 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Joe Buck
23:06 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Vladimir Makarov
22:30 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Daniel Berlin
22:28 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) James E Wilson
22:26 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:23 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Vladimir Makarov
22:16 Problem with tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:get_computation-cost Richard Kenner
22:15 mirror health Mike Stump
22:11 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) James E Wilson
22:06 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's default presumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Joe Buck
21:46 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler James E Wilson
21:32 Re: errors when compiling gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd-5.2.1. Gerald Pfeifer
21:30 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
21:12 Re: [C++] Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Geoffrey Keating
21:07 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
20:53 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Kai Henningsen
20:29 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
20:25 Re: Ada is broken in a clean directory Paul Brook
20:08 Re: Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Paul Schlie
19:47 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Steven Bosscher
19:15 Should GCC publish a general rule/warning due to it's defaultpresumption of undefined signed integer overflow semantics? Paul Schlie
19:06 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
19:02 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Daniel Berlin
18:48 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Giovanni Bajo
18:25 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Giovanni Bajo
18:23 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Jeffrey A Law
18:19 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Joe Buck
18:12 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Bernd Schmidt
17:51 PR 21963 & 22212 Richard Kenner
17:48 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Jeffrey A Law
16:55 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Steven Bosscher
16:47 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
16:28 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:constant_multiple_of Richard Kenner
16:08 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Andrew Pinski
16:04 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 fjahanian
15:51 Re: Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed Ulrich Weigand
15:13 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:constant_multiple_of Zdenek Dvorak
15:03 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 fjahanian
14:42 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 fjahanian
14:20 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Mostafa Hagog
14:19 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Andrey Belevantsev
13:50 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Vladimir Makarov
11:57 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
10:53 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Richard Earnshaw
10:22 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
09:32 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Richard Earnshaw
08:02 moene.indiv.nluug.nl is down and out ... Toon Moene
06:08 Re: Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Shaun Jackman
04:35 [C++] Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Richard Henderson
03:44 initializing wider-than-pointers DJ Delorie
03:24 Ada is broken in a clean directory Andrew Pinski
02:21 Re: Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Russell Shaw
02:17 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:constant_multiple_of Andrew Pinski
01:19 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Daniel Berlin
01:17 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Daniel Berlin
00:34 Re: Re: hpux regression vs 4.0.1 John David Anglin

June 29, 2005
23:55 Re: PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Richard Henderson
23:45 Re: Re: hpux regression vs 4.0.1 Jeffrey A Law
23:43 Re: Aalokrai Porwal
23:30 Re: Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Dale Johannesen
23:17 Re: Re: Joe Buck
22:57 PARM_DECL of DECL_SIZE 0, but TYPE_SIZE of 96 bits Daniel Berlin
22:46 Scheduler questions (related to PR17808) Steven Bosscher
21:57 Re: Geoffrey Keating
21:54 Re: Re: Jeffrey A Law
21:51 Add clog10 to builtins.def, round 2 François-Xavier Coudert
21:49 Re: Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Shaun Jackman
21:42 Question on tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:constant_multiple_of Richard Kenner
21:28 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Marc
20:40 Re: Mark Mitchell
19:13 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nicholas Nethercote
18:48 Re: Bryce McKinlay
18:45 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Robert Dewar
18:37 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Olivier Galibert
18:32 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
18:01 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Daniel Berlin
18:01 Re: Pro64-based GPLed compiler Vladimir Makarov
17:39 Re: Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Daniel Jacobowitz
17:34 Statement expression with function-call variable lifetime Shaun Jackman
17:00 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Joe Buck
16:46 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
16:19 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Eric Botcazou
15:46 Pro64-based GPLed compiler Marc Gonzalez-Sigler
15:38 Re: named address spaces (update) E. Weddington
15:37 Re: named address spaces (update) E. Weddington
15:01 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Koning
14:59 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Schlie
14:21 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nicholas Nethercote
13:35 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Robert Dewar
13:15 Re: named address spaces (update) Daniel Jacobowitz
13:12 RE: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Dave Korn
12:55 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Daniel Berlin
12:51 Re: GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Daniel Berlin
12:44 Re: GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Steven J. Hill
12:18 Re: named address spaces (update) DJ Delorie
12:14 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Robert Dewar
11:16 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Michael Veksler
11:04 Re: GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Andi Kleen
09:47 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Theodore Papadopoulo
09:18 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Robert Dewar
09:04 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Michael Veksler
09:04 Re: GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Richard Henderson
08:48 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Eric Botcazou
08:48 named address spaces (update) Martin Koegler
08:42 Re: The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Robert Dewar
08:33 The utility of standard's semantics for overflow Michael Veksler
07:40 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Schlie
07:08 Re: A question about a possible build problem. Zack Weinberg
06:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Eric Botcazou
06:16 Re: [Ada] Patch needed to boostrap Ada on x86_64 as of 20050628 Laurent GUERBY
06:04 A question about a possible build problem. George R Goffe
05:17 Re: stage 2 date? Mark Mitchell
04:59 GCC-4.1.0 size optimization bug for MIPS architecture... Steven J. Hill
04:18 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Joe Buck
03:13 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Scott Robert Ladd
02:19 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Marcin Dalecki
01:33 Re: Do CO++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Schlie
01:27 stage 2 date? Ben Elliston
01:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Diego Novillo
01:14 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:48 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
00:43 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
00:27 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
00:02 gcc-3.4-20050628 is now available gccadmin

June 28, 2005
23:53 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
23:05 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
22:58 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Georg Bauhaus
22:41 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Georg Bauhaus
22:19 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
22:16 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Falk Hueffner
22:09 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joseph S. Myers
21:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Mike Stump
21:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
21:57 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
21:53 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
21:50 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
21:48 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
21:44 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
21:41 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
21:39 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andreas Schwab
21:35 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
21:27 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Paul Koning
21:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
20:58 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:51 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
20:50 [Ada] Patch needed to boostrap Ada on x86_64 as of 20050628 Laurent GUERBY
20:37 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
20:31 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
20:24 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
20:18 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Paul Koning
20:08 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Jeffrey A Law
19:48 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:44 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Toon Moene
19:43 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:32 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
19:25 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
19:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
19:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
19:17 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
19:17 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
19:13 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
19:10 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
19:02 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:56 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
18:52 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
18:52 Re: Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed Diego Novillo
18:50 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
18:44 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
18:42 Re: Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed Andrew Pinski
18:40 Re: Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed David Edelsohn
18:38 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
18:38 Bootstrap failure -- verify_ssa failed Ulrich Weigand
18:38 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Jeffrey A Law
18:36 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
18:28 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
18:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:12 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Mark Mitchell
18:09 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
18:02 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
17:58 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:51 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
17:46 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Theodore Papadopoulo
17:41 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Paul Schlie
17:36 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
17:35 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Diego Novillo
17:34 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
17:32 Re: G++ and ISO C++ Giovanni Bajo
17:23 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
17:21 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
17:18 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
17:16 RE: LCOV Dave Korn
17:10 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
17:08 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Daniel Berlin
17:03 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Mark Mitchell
17:00 Re: G++ and ISO C++ Kurt Wall
17:00 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Giovanni Bajo
16:59 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Morten Welinder
16:56 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
16:54 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Joe Buck
16:47 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Joseph S. Myers
16:42 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
16:39 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:38 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
16:32 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Joe Buck
16:15 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Joe Buck
16:07 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Jeffrey A Law
16:07 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Andrew Pinski
15:58 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
15:55 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:51 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Mark Mitchell
15:49 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
15:41 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Jeffrey A Law
15:30 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
15:04 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Haley
15:01 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
14:52 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
14:47 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
14:42 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
14:39 RE: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Dave Korn
14:33 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
14:28 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Jonathan Wilson
14:24 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Olivier Galibert
14:23 Re: Some basic/beginner questions Diego Novillo
14:13 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:11 Some basic/beginner questions nico
14:05 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
14:05 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Andrew Pinski
13:59 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:58 G++ and ISO C++ Mirza
13:52 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
13:47 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Paubert
13:29 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
13:27 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Daniel Berlin
13:19 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:57 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
12:50 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Scott Robert Ladd
12:38 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
12:35 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
12:34 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:33 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:30 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
12:16 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Koning
12:09 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
12:08 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
12:08 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:07 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
12:03 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Ulrich Weigand
12:01 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:50 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
11:19 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Steven Bosscher
10:08 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Robert Dewar
09:49 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
09:48 Re: No tail call optimization in Thumb mode? Richard Earnshaw
09:43 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Giovanni Bajo
09:18 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Robert Dewar
07:39 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Falk Hueffner
07:25 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
07:22 GCC 4.0.1 Status (2005-06-27) Mark Mitchell
07:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
06:55 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Steven Bosscher
06:01 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
05:34 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
05:13 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:50 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
04:34 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Gabriel Dos Reis
04:20 Re: signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Michael Veksler
04:08 signed is undefined and has been since 1992 (in GCC) Andrew Pinski
03:49 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
03:06 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Mark Mitchell
02:28 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types Richard Kenner
00:49 Re: some errors compiling gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2. Zack Weinberg
00:43 some errors compiling gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2. wangxiuli
00:43 errors when compiling gcc-3.4.4 and gcc-4.0.0 on i386 freebsd -5.2.1. wangxiuli

June 27, 2005
23:36 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types James A. Morrison
21:52 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
20:48 Re: Q about Ada and value ranges in types Richard Kenner
19:56 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Richard Henderson
19:20 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
17:41 LCOV Dickson Patton
17:03 Re: makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..} Karl Berry
16:40 Re: [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms Joe Buck
15:48 Newbie question: Offset for a pseudo. N V Krishna
15:30 Re: expanding builtins James Lemke
15:24 Re: expanding builtins Andreas Schwab
15:21 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
15:21 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:17 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:05 re: [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms Dan Kegel
14:47 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Paul Koning
14:39 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Morten Welinder
14:36 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
14:26 Re: expanding builtins Jakub Jelinek
14:12 expanding builtins James Lemke
14:10 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:02 Re: Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Nathan Sidwell
12:32 Re: [Ada] Current patch needed to build Ada as of 20050626 Eric Botcazou
12:18 Re: [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms Nathan Sidwell
08:56 Re: -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Liu Haibin
05:09 Do C++ signed types have modulo semantics? Michael Veksler
01:56 Re: Confusing code in regrename.c Richard Henderson

June 26, 2005
22:11 Re: [Ada] Current patch needed to build Ada as of 20050626 Andrew Pinski
22:09 Re: attributes and templates Andrew Pinski
21:54 attributes and templates Nathan Sidwell
21:00 [Ada] Current patch needed to build Ada as of 20050626 Laurent GUERBY
16:53 Re: makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..} Gerald Pfeifer
16:11 Re: cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Gerald Pfeifer
15:27 Confusing code in regrename.c Steven Bosscher
13:42 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gerald Pfeifer

June 25, 2005
21:32 How to build GCC 3.2.2 on Fedora Core 3 with AMD64? Neo Jia
18:06 gcc-4.1-20050625 is now available gccadmin
06:58 RSS feed for webpage? Sam Lauber
00:06 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Steven Bosscher

June 24, 2005
23:46 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 fjahanian
23:11 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Gerald Pfeifer
22:17 Re: [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Andrew Pinski
22:06 [RFH] - Less than optimal code compiling 252.eon -O2 for x86 Fariborz Jahanian
21:44 Re: removing src/{expect,dejagnu} Mark Kettenis
16:09 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
15:40 Re: Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish. Robert Dewar
13:57 Re: Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish. Andreas Schwab
13:51 removing src/{expect,dejagnu} Ben Elliston
13:27 Suggestion for simple feature - "beep" on finish. Graham Pratt
10:16 RE: Cross compiler Dave Korn
10:10 Re: Cross compiler Ranjit Mathew
09:42 Cross compiler Eric Liu
06:15 No tail call optimization in Thumb mode? Kazu Hirata
05:53 gcc developers, donate money to help fight cancer! Patrick McFarland
03:01 Re: -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Liu Haibin
02:07 Re: dead label use? Geoffrey Keating
00:12 defaults.h silliness Mike Stump
00:06 gcc-4.0-20050623 is now available gccadmin

June 23, 2005
23:46 Re: -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Daniel Berlin
23:08 Re: -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Zdenek Dvorak
21:05 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status Mark Mitchell
18:42 Re: Changelog question for the FSF address change Zack Weinberg
18:41 [RFC] gcov tool, comparing coverage across platforms ransom
16:55 Re: Changelog question for the FSF address change Joseph S. Myers
16:00 Changelog question for the FSF address change Kelley Cook
15:58 Re: Forward: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED] Zack Weinberg
15:48 Re: does friend qualify as a forward decl? Andrew Pinski
15:39 does friend qualify as a forward decl? Tom Marshall
14:45 Re: GCC 4.0.1 Status Andrew Pinski
14:08 GCC 4.0.1 Status Mark Mitchell
12:43 Re: add sourcefiles to gcc Rafael Espíndola
08:47 -fprofile-arcs changes the structure of basic blocks Liu Haibin
08:10 Re: add sourcefiles to gcc nico
07:27 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Paolo Bonzini
02:43 Re: dead label use? Ian Lance Taylor
01:09 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
00:56 The Linux binutils 2.16.91.0.1 is released H. J. Lu

June 22, 2005
23:40 dead label use? Mike Stump
22:04 Re: spec benchmark testing Andrew Pinski
21:36 spec benchmark testing Virender Kashyap
21:35 Re: CFT: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Geoffrey Keating
21:33 Re: cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Joe Buck
20:17 Re: cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:56 Re: cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Andrew Pinski
19:48 cpp, CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH, and g++: bug or feature? Gerald Pfeifer
19:44 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Gerald Pfeifer
19:41 Re: gcc template error? Shelly Adhikari
19:31 RE: gcc template error? Jason Mancini
19:29 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Zack Weinberg
19:00 Re: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Giovanni Bajo
18:28 Re: -floop-optimize2 Scott Robert Ladd
18:14 Re: gcc template error? Andrew Pinski
17:58 gcc template error? Shelly Adhikari
17:52 Re: add sourcefiles to gcc Rafael Espíndola
17:41 Re: -floop-optimize2 Zdenek Dvorak
16:43 Re: Blogging the gcc summit Joe Buck
15:55 RE: Getting the byte offset of a member variable pointer type Dave Korn
15:52 Blogging the gcc summit dank
14:06 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Mark Mitchell
13:48 Getting the byte offset of a member variable pointer type Thomas Immich
13:25 CFT: toplevel bootstrap (stage 2 project) Paolo Bonzini
12:47 add sourcefiles to gcc nico
07:01 meet problem when building uCOSII with gcc-h8s ported version 唐 垠
05:46 Re: Cross compiler libgcc.a with -mthumb-interwork Jani Monoses
03:57 Re: [4.0.0] "make check-g++" fails linking tests on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Andrew Pinski
03:52 [4.0.0] "make check-g++" fails linking tests on powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 Douglas Gregor
01:55 Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Feng Wang

June 21, 2005
23:34 gcc-3.4-20050621 is now available gccadmin
22:46 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 DJ Delorie
22:44 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
22:35 Cross compiler libgcc.a with -mthumb-interwork John Carter
22:31 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
22:24 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 DJ Delorie
22:17 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
18:38 Bugzilla entries for arc-elf32 target Saurabh Verma
17:55 Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Joseph S. Myers
17:48 Re: Problem implementing faults in Objective-C Andrew Pinski
17:20 Re: Problem implementing faults in Objective-C Frederic Stark
17:02 Re: Template declaration inside function Mattias Karlsson
16:49 Re: Problem implementing faults in Objective-C Timothy J. Wood
16:44 Re: Template declaration inside function Florian Weimer
16:39 Template declaration inside function Mattias Karlsson
16:32 Re: -floop-optimize2 Scott Robert Ladd
16:30 Re: -floop-optimize2 Scott Robert Ladd
16:18 Re: -floop-optimize2 Richard Guenther
16:17 Re: -floop-optimize2 Steven Bosscher
16:14 Re: -floop-optimize2 Andrew Pinski
16:10 -floop-optimize2 Scott Robert Ladd
16:04 Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Giovanni Bajo
15:33 Re: An Rvalue references for g++ patch Gabriel Dos Reis
15:21 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
14:54 回复： Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Feng Wang
14:33 Re: How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Tobias . Schlueter
14:21 How to write testcase with two warnings on one line? Feng Wang
13:28 An Rvalue references for g++ patch Pedro LamarÃo
12:49 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
11:13 Problem implementing faults in Objective-C Frederic Stark
09:55 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Michael Meissner
06:38 Re: Software pipelining capabilities Vasanth

June 20, 2005
22:20 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Mike Stump
21:47 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Mike Stump
21:42 Re: 4.0.0->4.0.1 regression: Can't use 64-bit shared libs on powerpc-apple-darwin8.1.0 Bradley Lucier
20:58 Re: c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
19:53 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Kai Henningsen
19:53 Re: c/c++ validator Kai Henningsen
18:16 PATCH: PR 1025: binutils failed to build gcc 4.0.1 20050619 H. J. Lu
18:10 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question DJ Delorie
18:01 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
17:18 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
17:11 Re: Cygwin build failure Paul Thomas
16:57 Re: Cygwin build failure François-Xavier Coudert
16:52 Re: Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Daniel Berlin
16:09 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Benjamin Kosnik
16:07 Re: Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Joseph S. Myers
16:04 Re: Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Andrew Pinski
16:00 Re: Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Andrew Pinski
15:58 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
15:43 Someone introduced a libiberty crashing bug in the past week Daniel Berlin
15:36 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Pinski
15:29 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
15:04 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
15:01 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Pinski
14:56 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vectorshifts? Dorit Naishlos
14:55 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
14:54 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
14:35 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Pinski
14:28 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
14:26 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Pinski
14:25 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Scott Robert Ladd
14:04 Re: How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Andrew Haley
13:40 How to replace -O1 with corresponding -f's? Sergei Organov
13:22 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Sebastian Pop
13:17 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
13:14 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
13:13 PATCH: PR 1022: binutils failed to build gcc 4.0.1 20050619 H. J. Lu
13:09 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
13:01 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
12:59 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
12:53 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
12:46 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
12:39 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
12:23 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
12:09 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
12:09 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
12:08 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
11:34 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
11:32 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
11:26 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
11:14 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
11:04 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
10:56 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Joseph S. Myers
10:54 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
10:43 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
10:32 Re: PowerPC small data sections. Sergei Organov
10:14 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Michael Veksler
09:50 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Michael Veksler
09:25 Re: libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 libraries Jonathan Wakely
08:13 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Steven Bosscher
07:51 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Michael Veksler
07:07 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Benjamin Kosnik
06:30 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Ranjit Mathew
06:21 PATCH: PR/1025: binutils failed to build gcc 4.0.1 20050619 H. J. Lu
06:12 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Mark Williams (MWP)
05:55 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
05:50 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
05:46 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Mark Williams (MWP)
05:41 Re: Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Eric Christopher
05:32 Error building 4.0.1-RC2 Mark Williams (MWP)
05:22 gcc 4.0.1 (prerelease): new libstdc++ testsuite failures on sparc-linux Christian Joensson
02:44 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar

June 19, 2005
23:59 Re: c/c++ validator David Bremner
23:47 Getting to the gcc summit Daniel Kegel
23:26 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Gabriel Dos Reis
22:52 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Geoff Keating
22:49 libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 libraries Bill
22:45 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Gabriel Dos Reis
22:13 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vector shifts? Richard Henderson
21:56 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Geoffrey Keating
20:58 Re: c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
20:56 Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3 Kai Ruottu
20:55 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vectorshifts? Dorit Naishlos
20:43 Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3 Kai Ruottu
20:30 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Paolo Carlini
20:22 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues John David Anglin
20:21 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Marcin Dalecki
20:20 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Jakub Jelinek
18:23 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
18:10 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Joseph S. Myers
17:33 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vector shifts? Richard Henderson
17:20 question about match_operand and vec_select Ling-hua Tseng
17:14 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
17:08 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vectorshifts? Dorit Naishlos
16:50 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vector shifts? Richard Henderson
16:34 Re: towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vectorshifts? Dorit Naishlos
16:17 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
16:06 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
15:55 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
15:53 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
15:50 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
15:48 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Paolo Carlini
15:46 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Mike Hearn
15:45 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Michael Veksler
15:40 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
15:33 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
15:18 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
13:57 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Andrew Pinski
13:54 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
13:52 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
13:48 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
13:40 Re: Bugzilla queries extremely slow Paolo Carlini
13:35 Re: Bugzilla queries extremely slow Daniel Berlin
13:07 Re: Bugzilla queries extremely slow Paolo Carlini
13:06 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Paolo Carlini
13:04 Bugzilla queries extremely slow Paolo Carlini
12:53 Re: Libstdc++ versioning issues Mike Hearn
11:16 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Steven Bosscher
11:11 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
10:56 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
10:54 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
10:49 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
10:18 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Kai Henningsen
10:18 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Kai Henningsen
10:17 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Haren Visavadia
09:47 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
09:42 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
09:29 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
09:25 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
09:15 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
09:12 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis
09:04 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
08:59 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
08:55 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
08:50 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
08:35 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Vincent Lefevre
03:48 Re: some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3 Steven J. Hill
03:04 Re: c/c++ validator Mark Loeser
02:48 Re: c/c++ validator Gabriel Dos Reis
02:41 Re: c/c++ validator Florian Krohm
02:36 some compile problem about gcc-2.95.3 zouqiong
02:36 Re: some question about gc zouqiong
02:16 Re: c/c++ validator Mathieu Malaterre
02:05 Re: c/c++ validator Gabriel Dos Reis
01:44 Re: c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
01:03 Re: c/c++ validator Gabriel Dos Reis
01:02 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
00:45 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Gabriel Dos Reis

June 18, 2005
22:45 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Tristan Wibberley
22:39 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Paolo Carlini
22:38 Re: c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
22:33 Re: Forward: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED] Jakub Jelinek
22:32 Re: c/c++ validator Mathieu Malaterre
22:27 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Eric Botcazou
22:24 c/c++ validator Tommy Vercetti
22:06 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 David Edelsohn
22:01 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Ulrich Weigand
22:01 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
21:52 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain infrustrating reporters Laurent GUERBY
21:48 towards reduction part 3/n: what does vec lower pass do to vector shifts? Dorit Naishlos
21:37 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
21:33 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustratingreporters Laurent GUERBY
21:30 Re: Forward: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED] Andrew Pinski
21:27 Forward: gcc-4.0.1-b20050607.de.po [REJECTED] "Martin v. LÃwis"
21:26 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
21:08 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
21:01 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Florian Weimer
20:55 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Robert Dewar
20:45 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
19:57 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Joseph S. Myers
19:16 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
18:52 Re: Fortran left broken for a couple of days now Jan Hubicka
18:50 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
18:46 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Mark Mitchell
18:33 Re: Regressions Jan Hubicka
18:21 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Joseph S. Myers
18:13 Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2 Benjamin Kosnik
18:12 gcc-4.1-20050618 is now available gccadmin
18:08 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Joseph S. Myers
18:05 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
17:44 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
16:19 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Joseph S. Myers
14:15 Re: basic VRP min/max range overflow question Paul Schlie
13:52 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
13:23 Re: Your rtti.c changes broke some obj-c++ tests Nathan Sidwell
13:22 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:18 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Toon Moene
13:15 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:12 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:10 Re: Your rtti.c changes broke some obj-c++ tests Nathan Sidwell
13:09 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:07 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
13:05 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Mattias Karlsson
13:04 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Toon Moene
12:48 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
12:43 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
12:39 Re: Reporting bugs: there is nothing to gain in frustrating reporters Robert Dewar
11:47 Re: Reporting bugs: there is noth