This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]


Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@vinc17.org> writes:

> On 2005-05-31 21:16:19 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@vinc17.org> writes:
>> > The "long double" type is required, but it is not required to be
>> > extended precision.
>> 
>> But it can be.
>
> So what?

You can take advantage of it if it exists (which you can find out about
portably).  But not if your compiler has crippled it.

>> > Once you change the rounding precision, this is no longer required,
>> > since you are already working with an extension.
>> 
>> The use of long double is not an extension.
>
> Changing the rounding precision is. The C standard defines how you
> can change the rounding direction, but not the rounding precision.

Yes, my point.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]