This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]

From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:27:01 +0200
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
References: <002d01c5643c$cfcc1140$bebc2997@bagio><OFA3607230.3197BBF0-ON43257010.003EFC6F-43257010.00542AB2@il.ibm.com><26669933.1117479096256.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net><429B7506.8010107@moene.indiv.nluug.nl><20050531121701.GQ3541@ay.vinc17.org>

Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@vinc17.org> writes:

> But as I said on my page, this isn't much a problem since users
> who really need *extended* precision can still set the rounding
> precision to extended precision; this isn't portable, but extended
> precision isn't portable anyway.

What about LDBL_* from <float.h>?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

References:
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: Michael Veksler
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: Toon Moene
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]