This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: chris jefferson <caj at cs dot york dot ac dot uk>,Kai Henningsen <kaih at khms dot westfalen dot de>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 00:51:48 +0100
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
References: <e0716e9f05052910475b5fc0fc@mail.gmail.com> <9XsNyBxHw-B@khms.westfalen.de> <429BA1A0.3010708@cs.york.ac.uk>

> Lets try to get a copy of gcc. Firstly I see something in the top-left
> marked "releases". I click on it. It doesn't mention 4.0, 

Fair point. This needs fixing.

> and despite reasonable attempts I see no sign of code. 

Huh? The first paragraph on that page is
"Source code for GCC releases may be downloaded from our <mirror sites>"

The following paragraph clearly states that this is source code, and link to 
the page with binaries on. It even says "Important:".

Furthermore the title of that section is "Download"

I don't see how you could possibly have missed this.

Paul

References:
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: William Beebe
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: Kai Henningsen
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: chris jefferson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]