This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy

From: Georg Bauhaus <bauhaus at futureapps dot de>
To: "Bernhard R. Link" <brl at pcpool00 dot mathematik dot uni-freiburg dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 20:38:00 +0200
Subject: Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
References: <4295DE66.2050701@coyotegulch.com> <20050526154754.GA10785@redhat.com> <4295F374.6070901@coyotegulch.com> <17045.62613.557950.285394@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20050529155740.D440412D1A@quatramaran.ens.fr> <429A10F4.3040704@futureapps.de> <20050530075732.GA3262@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de> <429B4EAC.8020601@futureapps.de> <20050530180307.GA6704@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>

Bernhard R. Link wrote:

naming any range smaller than some [-50pi,100pi] "valid" could
really make me crazy...


No one is asking for sine to be restricted in this way.
Some are asking for the freedom to request this or that
kind of sine computation to be generated, because they know
that for *their* range of numbers, this or that kind of sine
computation does what they want.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Marc Espie
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Bernhard R. Link
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Georg Bauhaus
- Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy
  - From: Bernhard R. Link

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]