This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]

From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc at vinc17 dot org>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:12:41 +0200
Subject: Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
References: <OFA3607230.3197BBF0-ON43257010.003EFC6F-43257010.00542AB2@il.ibm.com> <1117425580.16811.13.camel@linux.site>

On 2005-05-29 23:59:39 -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 18:19 +0300, Michael Veksler wrote:
> > If more than 50 people report it, independently, as a bug then it
> > sure is a bug.
> 
> Which is why it's still open!

It isn't (it was marked as INVALID).

> The problem with 323 isn't that we don't think it's really a bug,

In this case, it shouldn't have been marked as INVALID.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA

References:
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: Michael Veksler
- Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point]
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]