This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfc] mainline slush

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:08:45 +0200
Subject: Re: [rfc] mainline slush
References: <20050519003129.GA7983@redhat.com> <200505210016.28081.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <20050520232056.GA5104@redhat.com>

> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 12:16:27AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg01339.html
>
> The vectorization failures still need to be fixed.

Are these specific to SPARC?  If so, I don't think development should be held 
off for them at this point.  If not, platforms with real SIMD units are 
probably better testbeds.

The struct-layout-1 failures in 64-bit mode are IMHO more annoying, but these 
tests are easy to break so I'm not really worried either.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [rfc] mainline slush
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [rfc] mainline slush
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [rfc] mainline slush
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- [rfc] mainline slush
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [rfc] mainline slush
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [rfc] mainline slush
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]