This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [rfc] mainline slush

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 08:53:39 +0200
Subject: Re: [rfc] mainline slush
References: <20050519003129.GA7983@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505190058410.11883@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

> I'm not confident we know what clean results are for all the primary
> platforms, i.e. that anyone has tracked what failures are regressions and
> what aren't (which requires testing the FAILing tests with older
> compilers, not just presuming that a FAILing test not in a previous
> release isn't a regression).

I don't think we need to be that picky at this stage of the development 
process.  Results on 05/15 for SPARC/Solaris are pretty good:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg01061.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-05/msg01060.html
and can be considered as a baseline for now.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

References:
- [rfc] mainline slush
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [rfc] mainline slush
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]