This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

From: Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>,Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>,Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>, GCC List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 21:27:39 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
References: <17009.2368.986169.753001@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <200505170010.48984.stevenb@suse.de> <1116291223.8237.766.camel@mccallum.corsepiu.local> <200505170259.37615.stevenb@suse.de> <1116322155.13457.86.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

On 2005-05-17, at 11:29, Richard Earnshaw wrote:

On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 01:59, Steven Bosscher wrote:
No, I just don't build gfortran as a cross.  There are many reasons
why this is a bad idea anyway.
Such as?

The dependence on external packages which don't cross compile well for example.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Paul Brook

References:
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]