This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
- To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
- Cc: Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>, Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>, GCC List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 03:31:24 +0200
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- References: <17009.2368.986169.753001@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <200505170311.03979.stevenb@suse.de> <20050517011655.GA25562@synopsys.com>
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 03:16, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 03:11:03AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 May 2005 02:59, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > > Oh, and how helpful of you to post that patch to gcc-patches@ too...
> > > NOT!
> >
> > Ah, I see you did post it to gcc-patches@, but not to fortran@, which
> > is a requirement for gfortran patches -- and the reason why nobody
> > has noticed the patch.
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02287.html
> >
> > The patch is OK too.
>
> Steven, please try to be politer to someone who is trying to help.
How is it helpful to not follow the rules when posting patches and
make exaggerated claims that something does not work? All this
complaining makes me not want to contribute to GCC at all any more.
> This kind of tone will only discourage contributors.
My tone was no different than Ralf's toward me.
This is the second time you think it necessary to "correct" me on a
public mailing list. Don't do that.
Gr.
Steven