This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
- To: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl, scott dot ladd at coyotegulch dot com, dewar at adacore dot com, peter at the-baradas dot com, Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM, hjl at lucon dot org, aph at redhat dot com, aoliva at redhat dot com, dje at watson dot ibm dot com, schwab at suse dot de, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu, pkoning at equallogic dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, matt at 3am-software dot com, cow at compsoc dot man dot ac dot uk
- Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:46:25 -0400
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- References: <17009.2368.986169.753001@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <1116249726.13457.49.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <4288B3FA.40706@coyotegulch.com> <200505161717.31407.s.bosscher@student.tudelft.nl> <1116258837.13457.68.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>
> No company is going to spend money on fixing this until we adjust
> our (collective) attitude and take this seriously.
We could call ulimit() to force everyone to have less available RAM.
Connect it with one of the maintainer flags, like enable-checking or
something, so it doesn't penalize distributors.