This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
- To: "Jason Thorpe" <thorpej at shagadelic dot org>
- Cc: "Gcc Mailing List" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 02:41:08 +0200
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?
- References: <JCEPIPKHCJGDMPOHDOIGIECJCOAA.firstname.lastname@example.org><426F2D5D.email@example.com><200504271441.j3REfND27584@makai.watson.ibm.com><43D7D183-F9AF-4728-8564-8A6C74673E3E@shagadelic.org> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <027601c54dbb$79159d90$24b02997@bagio> <DF0C8D08-4142-4A3C-8419-A7480DD5C678@shagadelic.org>
Jason Thorpe <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I would also like to note that I *myself* requested preprocessed
>> source code to
>> NetBSD developers at least 6 times in the past 2 years. I am sure
>> Andrew Pinski
>> did too, a comparable amound of times. These requests, as far as I
>> can understand, were never answered. This also helped building up a
>> stereotype of
>> the average NetBSD developer being "just a GCC whine troll".
> While I have not had much time for a quite a while to work on GCC
> myself, I am listed as NetBSD maintainer... you can always drop me a
> note directly when this sort of thing happens.
Thanks! Are you then going to file in Bugzilla some preprocessed sources that
show the 2.95 -> 3.3 slowdown experimented by NetBSD folks?