gcc archive
date index for May, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2005
23:53 gcc-3.4-20050531 is now available gccadmin
23:40 ERROR in the gfortran testsuite Andrew Pinski
23:30 Improving GCC Floating-Point [was: What is wrong with Bugzilla?] Scott Robert Ladd
22:58 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
22:43 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
20:11 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
19:58 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
19:53 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
19:43 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
19:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Geoff Keating
19:27 RFA: Fix PR21767 (Was: Re: RFD: what to do about stale REG_EQUAL notes in dead_or_predictable) Joern RENNECKE
19:18 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
18:40 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Mike Stump
18:35 Your Resume for the position of Business Analyst InactiveJob
17:44 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Dave Korn
17:44 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Jakub Jelinek
17:43 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
17:22 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
17:21 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
17:17 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
17:14 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
17:14 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Dave Korn
17:12 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Dave Korn
17:10 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Hugh Sasse
17:03 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Mike Stump
17:01 RE: Hello,Gnu Dave Korn
17:01 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Daniel Berlin
16:53 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Dave Korn
16:05 Re: Hello,Gnu Jonathan Wakely
15:58 Hello,Gnu dk zhou
15:11 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
15:10 FYI: Upgrading sourceware mysql to 4.x Daniel Berlin
14:34 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Jeffrey A Law
14:32 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Scott Robert Ladd
14:13 Re: GCC Compiler sjhill
14:08 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
13:57 GCC Compiler Thomas Bernard
13:44 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
13:35 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
13:34 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
13:17 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C Paolo Bonzini
13:02 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:51 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C Ulrich Weigand
12:48 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:46 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:33 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
12:27 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andreas Schwab
12:24 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
12:17 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:16 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Andrew Haley
12:13 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
12:08 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
12:04 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Richard Kenner
11:24 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Geert Bosch
09:11 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
07:40 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in Cwith -O2 Paolo Bonzini
06:04 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
05:56 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? R Hill
03:50 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
03:10 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
03:06 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
02:47 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] R Hill

May 30, 2005
23:51 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Paul Brook
23:44 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Gary Funck
23:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] chris jefferson
23:15 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy chris jefferson
22:15 successful build of GCC 4.0.0 on Mac OS 10.4.1 Bojan Antonovic
21:36 Re: configure test for a mmap flag Steve Kargl
21:31 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Richard Kenner
21:17 Re: configure test for a mmap flag Florian Weimer
21:10 configure test for a mmap flag Steve Kargl
20:50 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Florian Weimer
20:46 make check on FreeBSD AMD64 5.4Release DJ Vincent
20:34 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Jakub Jelinek
20:32 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Florian Weimer
20:20 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Toon Moene
20:18 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
20:13 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Ulrich Weigand
20:12 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
20:05 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
20:04 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Diego Novillo
20:03 Re: Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Richard Kenner
19:59 Stickiness of TYPE_MIN_VALUE/TYPE_MAX_VALUE Florian Weimer
19:54 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Robert Dewar
19:39 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
19:22 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Andrew Pinski
19:17 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
19:16 Re: 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Andrew Pinski
18:59 4.0 regression: missing debug info for global variables in C with -O2 Ulrich Weigand
18:38 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Georg Bauhaus
18:11 RE: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Gary Funck
18:10 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
18:03 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Bernhard R. Link
17:34 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Georg Bauhaus
17:31 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:26 Re: ifcvt.c question Roger Sayle
17:26 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:18 Re: Problem with scan-tree-dump-times in dg.exp Diego Novillo
17:03 Re: Problem with scan-tree-dump-times in dg.exp Jeffrey A Law
16:32 Problem with scan-tree-dump-times in dg.exp Diego Novillo
16:07 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
15:48 ifcvt.c question Steven Bosscher
15:48 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
15:43 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marc Espie
15:40 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Zack Weinberg
15:39 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? William Beebe
15:36 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:35 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:34 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Michael Veksler
15:34 Extension: GCC warnings for pure/reentrant functions David Austin
15:31 Is it possible to catch overflow in long long multiply ? Victor STINNER
15:31 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Kai Henningsen
15:30 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Bernhard R. Link
15:29 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
15:28 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
15:25 question in generating rtl code zouq
15:19 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:19 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
15:19 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
15:19 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta

May 29, 2005
20:58 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gerald Pfeifer
20:18 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Joe Buck
20:13 Re: bug or not ? ada loop in gcc-4.1-20050528 Andrew Pinski
20:09 bug or not ? ada loop in gcc-4.1-20050528 Marc Espie
19:24 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marc Espie
19:16 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Georg Bauhaus
18:52 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
18:32 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Joseph S. Myers
18:23 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Brian Dessent
18:16 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? Russ Allbery
18:16 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Brian Dessent
18:05 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key Russ Allbery
17:47 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] William Beebe
17:25 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Kai Henningsen
17:23 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Marc Espie
15:57 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marc Espie
15:38 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Michael Veksler
15:19 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Michael Veksler
15:18 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
12:54 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Paul Schlie
12:07 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
10:54 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Giovanni Bajo
10:52 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Giovanni Bajo
10:23 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Michael Veksler
09:56 [wwwdocs] Re: Bug in http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html Gerald Pfeifer
07:51 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Haren Visavadia
07:33 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Roger Sayle
06:22 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gabriel Dos Reis
06:07 Re: A newbie question: Maping pseudos to declaration. N V Krishna
05:57 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released R Hill
05:08 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] R Hill
04:47 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Joe Buck
04:37 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Ross Smith
03:36 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Geoffrey Keating
02:22 Re: A newbie question: Maping pseudos to declaration. Ian Lance Taylor
01:47 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
01:30 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis

May 28, 2005
23:57 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Scott Robert Ladd
23:29 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Kai Henningsen
23:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Kai Henningsen
23:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Kai Henningsen
23:02 A newbie question: Maping pseudos to declaration. N V Krishna
22:52 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Vincent Lefevre
22:47 C++ PATCH: PR 2922 Douglas Gregor
20:23 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] William Beebe
19:07 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Daniel Berlin
18:08 gcc-4.1-20050528 is now available gccadmin
17:10 Re: What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Scott Robert Ladd
17:02 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key imacat
16:10 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Paul Schlie
15:55 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key Gerald Pfeifer
15:44 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key Gabriel Dos Reis
15:26 Re: Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key Gerald Pfeifer
15:15 What is wrong with Bugzilla? [Was: Re: GCC and Floating-Point] Uros Bizjak
14:38 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Tobias Schlüter
14:28 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Paul Thomas
14:21 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Joseph S. Myers
14:09 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Andrew Pinski
13:48 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Paul Thomas
13:39 Re: Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Andrew Pinski
12:35 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
12:11 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
11:57 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Joseph S. Myers
11:43 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
11:26 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gerald Pfeifer
10:44 Build failure under Cygwin_NT-5.0 Paul Thomas
08:49 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Toon Moene
06:42 Induction Variable Rajkishore Barik
05:02 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Paul Schlie
04:32 Re: GCC 3.3.6 has been released R Hill
01:12 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Russ Allbery

May 27, 2005
23:43 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gary Funck
23:01 Recall: Tony Mueller
21:44 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
21:16 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
20:55 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
20:39 Re: mixing gcc-4.0 and g++-3.3 generated code Mike Stump
20:39 Need GCC 3.3.6 PGP Signing Public Key imacat
19:55 Numerous ObjC DejaGNU failures on i686-pc-linux-gnu Ziemowit Laski
19:27 Re: Bootstrap problem Andrew Pinski
18:51 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
18:45 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Andrew Pinski
18:43 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
18:32 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Andrew Pinski
18:29 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
18:28 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Dale Johannesen
18:27 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Paul Koning
18:23 Re: More front end type mismatch problems Ian Lance Taylor
18:07 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
18:06 More front end type mismatch problems Diego Novillo
17:49 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Richard Guenther
17:33 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
15:32 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marcin Dalecki
15:28 Re: Removal of 4.0.0 last minute page from Wiki? Mark Mitchell
15:25 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Paul Koning
15:19 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Allan Sandfeld Jensen
15:09 Re: GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Ian Lance Taylor
14:58 Removal of 4.0.0 last minute page from Wiki? Giovanni Bajo
14:21 Re: [Fwd: Uninitialized stack gaps and conservative garbage collection] Camm Maguire
14:08 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
13:56 mixing gcc-4.0 and g++-3.3 generated code Jack Howarth
13:42 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
13:37 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Olivier Galibert
13:21 Re: How can I get rid of __main ? Nathan Sidwell
13:12 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
12:42 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Vincent Lefevre
12:36 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Vincent Lefevre
12:03 GCC 3.3.1 -O2 problem with sqrt.c Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
11:59 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
11:52 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
11:31 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Daniel Berlin
11:29 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
10:48 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
09:36 How can I get rid of __main ? Monika Chaddha
04:04 Re: help, cvs screwed up Mike Stump
03:47 Re: help, cvs screwed up Ian Lance Taylor
03:10 help, cvs screwed up Mike Stump
01:20 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marcin Dalecki
01:20 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marcin Dalecki
01:20 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Marcin Dalecki
00:44 GCC 4.0.1 Status Report (2005-05-26) Mark Mitchell
00:43 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
00:39 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
00:18 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
00:05 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd

May 26, 2005
23:59 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
23:57 gcc-4.0-20050526 is now available gccadmin
23:56 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
23:52 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
23:31 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
23:25 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
21:33 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Menezes, Evandro
21:17 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Steven Bosscher
21:15 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
21:08 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
20:58 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Uros Bizjak
20:50 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
20:26 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Richard Henderson
19:35 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
19:28 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Gabriel Dos Reis
19:14 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
18:50 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
18:49 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Allan Sandfeld Jensen
18:38 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Joseph S. Myers
18:32 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
18:30 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Dave Korn
18:22 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Pinski
18:12 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
18:10 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:56 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Morten Welinder
17:55 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:53 RFD: what to do about stale REG_EQUAL notes in dead_or_predictable Joern RENNECKE
17:41 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Dave Korn
17:40 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
17:37 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:35 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Dave Korn
17:29 GCC 3.3.6 has been released Gabriel Dos Reis
17:27 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Morten Welinder
17:27 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
17:24 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
17:23 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy David Daney
17:14 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Kevin Handy
17:01 RE: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Dave Korn
16:33 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
16:09 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paul Koning
16:05 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
15:48 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Richard Henderson
15:45 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
15:36 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Paolo Carlini
15:21 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
15:08 Re: Sine and Cosine Accuracy Andrew Haley
14:35 Sine and Cosine Accuracy Scott Robert Ladd
13:55 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Scott Robert Ladd
13:48 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Gabriel Dos Reis
13:40 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Paul Brook
13:27 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Scott Robert Ladd
13:14 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Daniel Berlin
12:05 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Richard Guenther
11:57 Re: GCC and Floating-Point (A proposal) Scott Robert Ladd
08:15 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
08:14 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
08:03 Re: Ada Status in mainline Andreas Jaeger
06:11 Re: i387 control word register definition is missing Uros Bizjak
05:57 Re: Ada Status in mainline Jeffrey A Law
01:30 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
00:35 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Schlie

May 25, 2005
22:39 RE: GCC and Floating-Point Menezes, Evandro
22:03 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Steven G. Johnson
21:52 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
21:46 Re: Ada Status in mainline Andreas Schwab
21:41 Re: Ada Status in mainline Diego Novillo
21:37 Re: Ada Status in mainline Jeffrey A Law
20:52 Re: [RFC] Provide SSE/SSE2 ABI math builtins for ia32 Jan Hubicka
20:50 Re: i387 control word register definition is missing Jan Hubicka
19:48 Re: [RFC] Provide SSE/SSE2 ABI math builtins for ia32 Richard Henderson
19:27 [RFC] Provide SSE/SSE2 ABI math builtins for ia32 Richard Guenther
18:44 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Schlie
18:31 hidden enum constants (Was: Compiling GCC with g++: a report) Giovanni Bajo
18:15 Re: Ada Status in mainline Diego Novillo
18:08 Re: Ada Status in mainline Richard Kenner
17:35 RE: GCC and Floating-Point Uros Bizjak
17:27 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Richard Kenner
17:27 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Allan Sandfeld Jensen
16:18 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
16:12 RE: GCC and Floating-Point Menezes, Evandro
15:59 Re: Ada Status in mainline Richard Guenther
15:56 Re: Ada Status in mainline Graham Stott
15:42 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
15:22 Re: Ada Status in mainline Andreas Schwab
15:18 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Jason Merrill
15:18 Re: Bug in http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html Olly Betts
15:04 Re: Ada Status in mainline Steven Bosscher
14:59 RE: GCC and Floating-Point Dave Korn
14:58 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
14:57 Ada Status in mainline Jeffrey A Law
14:52 Re: %dil in x86 inline asm Ian Lance Taylor
14:51 RE: Bug in http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html Dave Korn
14:35 Re: %dil in x86 inline asm Florian Weimer
14:28 Re: GCC and Floating-Point chris jefferson
14:18 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
14:13 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Vincent Lefevre
13:54 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning Paolo Carlini
13:53 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning Gabriel Dos Reis
13:45 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning (was: Re: Compiling GCC...) Theodore Papadopoulo
13:38 Bootstrap problem Andrew Pinski
13:33 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning Theodore Papadopoulo
13:30 %dil in x86 inline asm Phil Endecott
13:30 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning (was: Re: Compiling GCC...) Gabriel Dos Reis
12:48 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning Paolo Carlini
12:44 Re: libstdc++ soname and versioning (was: Re: Compiling GCC...) Theodore Papadopoulo
12:02 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:46 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Florian Weimer
09:51 Bug in http://gcc.gnu.org/translation.html Vincent Deffontaines
08:36 libstdc++ soname and versioning (was: Re: Compiling GCC...) Paolo Carlini
07:45 Re: i387 control word register definition is missing Uros Bizjak
06:10 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Christoph Hellwig
05:26 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Bernardo Innocenti
05:01 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Schlie
03:45 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Jason Merrill
03:34 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
03:20 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
03:14 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
02:36 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Schlie
02:24 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
02:20 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:08 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
01:50 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:47 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
01:47 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:40 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:36 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
01:24 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
01:16 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:12 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
01:02 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
01:02 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
00:55 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
00:52 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
00:48 gcc-3.4-20050524 is now available gccadmin
00:47 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
00:43 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Ian Lance Taylor
00:37 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paolo Carlini
00:37 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
00:29 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report DJ Delorie
00:26 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
00:22 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Russ Allbery
00:11 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
00:08 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
00:06 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg

May 24, 2005
23:53 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
23:45 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paolo Carlini
23:43 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
23:41 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Richard Henderson
23:38 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names Ian Lance Taylor
23:17 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
23:14 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
23:00 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
21:50 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mark Mitchell
21:40 Uninitialized stack gaps and conservative garbage collection Camm Maguire
20:43 Re: Profile-based inliner status? Paolo Carlini
20:41 Profile-based inliner status? Daniel Kegel
18:00 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kevin Handy
17:49 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
17:25 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kevin Handy
17:17 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Dale Johannesen
16:44 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Joe Buck
16:18 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Richard Guenther
16:07 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Diego Novillo
15:11 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
15:03 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Andreas Schwab
14:22 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paul Koning
13:41 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
13:18 Re: i387 control word register definition is missing Michael Meissner
10:01 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Paolo Bonzini
08:48 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Earnshaw
08:32 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Kai Henningsen
08:00 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:43 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:39 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:38 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Florian Weimer
07:17 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
07:09 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
07:08 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
07:04 Re: GCC and Floating-Point Uros Bizjak
07:04 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
06:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
06:43 Slush Mark Mitchell
06:31 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
06:29 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
06:26 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
06:25 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
06:22 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
06:18 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
06:13 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
06:04 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
05:54 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Mark Mitchell
05:01 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
04:59 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
04:57 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
04:03 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Andrew Pinski
03:59 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Daniel Jacobowitz
03:55 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Zack Weinberg
02:11 Re: Best Practices Russell Shaw

May 23, 2005
23:59 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Joseph S. Myers
23:51 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
23:06 Re: Best Practices Mike Stump
22:58 Best Practices Ron Hudson
22:20 Re: [wwwdocs] Simplify release process a bit Mark Mitchell
21:25 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Christopher
20:27 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Mark Mitchell
20:12 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Karel Gardas
20:00 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
19:59 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Mike Stump
19:57 Re: tree ssa and type issues Thomas R. Truscott
19:27 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Mark Mitchell
19:20 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Paolo Carlini
19:13 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Mark Mitchell
19:07 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Karel Gardas
19:01 Re: GNU C++ 4.0.1/4.1.0 cache misses on MICO sources. Mark Mitchell
18:43 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mark Mitchell
18:20 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
18:04 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mark Mitchell
17:35 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Steven Bosscher
17:32 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Tom Tromey
17:23 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Daniel Kegel
16:37 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
16:34 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
16:26 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis
16:26 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Earnshaw
16:21 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
16:19 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Daniel Berlin
16:00 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jeffrey A Law
15:43 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Christopher
15:35 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Sandiford
15:34 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Earnshaw
15:20 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Christopher
15:15 GCC and Floating-Point Scott Robert Ladd
13:19 Re: i387 control word reg definition is missing Sylvain Pion
12:22 Re: gcc-specific? Marcel Cox
11:50 gcc-specific? Erik Poupaert
08:28 i387 control word reg definition is missing Uros Bizjak
08:26 i387 control word register definition is missing Uros Bizjak
07:47 Re: GCSE considers read only memory clobbered by function calls. Mostafa Hagog
07:40 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Kai Ruottu
06:31 Re: Compiling GCC with g++: a report Ranjit Mathew
06:15 Compiling GCC with g++: a report Gabriel Dos Reis

May 22, 2005
20:18 Re: expand_main_function/PREFERRED_STACK_BOUNDARY on ppc Olivier Hainque
18:10 gcc-4.1-20050522 is now available gccadmin
15:00 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Dorit Naishlos
14:29 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Andreas Jaeger
14:26 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
14:23 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Dorit Naishlos
12:02 Re: Problem in assembly and linking(gcc-4.0) Ramana Radhakrishnan
08:52 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jan Hubicka
07:57 question in porting gcc front end zouq
05:09 Reduction rule for Kleene's Closure in replacement of Thompson's algorithm Erik Poupaert
04:32 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Zack Weinberg
01:28 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
00:03 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Gabriel Dos Reis

May 21, 2005
23:44 Re: tree ssa and type issues Andreas Schwab
23:42 gcc-4.0-20050521 is now available gccadmin
23:42 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to5339 bytes Giovanni Bajo
23:28 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Daniel Berlin
23:26 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
23:20 [wwwdocs] make release download more prominent (was: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html) Gerald Pfeifer
23:20 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Steven Bosscher
23:04 Re: Some questions about FIELD_DECL Gabriel Dos Reis
23:00 Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Gerald Pfeifer
22:45 Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Paolo Carlini
22:43 Some questions about FIELD_DECL Daniel Berlin
22:39 Re: gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Gerald Pfeifer
22:17 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jan Hubicka
22:06 gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Paolo Carlini
21:58 Spread snapshot building more evenly throughout the week Gerald Pfeifer
20:21 Re: tree ssa and type issues Steven Bosscher
20:21 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
20:15 Re: tree ssa and type issues Daniel Berlin
19:48 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
19:45 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
19:18 Re: tree ssa and type issues Daniel Berlin
18:49 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
18:49 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
18:46 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
18:43 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
18:34 Re: tree ssa and type issues Daniel Berlin
18:32 Re: tree ssa and type issues Daniel Berlin
18:17 Re: tree ssa and type issues Tom Tromey
18:08 Problem in assembly and linking(gcc-4.0) Virender Kashyap
17:51 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
17:31 Re: tree ssa and type issues Andreas Jaeger
17:23 Re: tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
16:55 Re: tree ssa and type issues Andreas Jaeger
16:50 tree ssa and type issues Gabriel Dos Reis
14:43 basic-block and tree statement iterator enums Gabriel Dos Reis
13:32 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Peter Barada
13:02 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Kai Henningsen
12:03 RE: C99 implies -Wimplicit-function-declaration? Joseph S. Myers
09:27 RE: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
09:13 [PR21029] [4.1 Regression] vrp miscompiles Ada front-end, ping... Christian Joensson
08:59 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Jan Hubicka
08:45 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
08:35 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Andreas Jaeger
08:33 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
08:28 A constant pool and addressing mode question Ling-hua Tseng
07:08 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
02:45 RE: C99 implies -Wimplicit-function-declaration? Gary Funck
01:54 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to5339 bytes Daniel Berlin
00:24 gcc-3.4-20050520 is now available gccadmin
00:22 Re: C99 implies -Wimplicit-function-declaration? Joseph S. Myers

May 20, 2005
23:28 C99 implies -Wimplicit-function-declaration? Gary Funck
23:22 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Henderson
22:15 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Eric Botcazou
22:07 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Joe Buck
22:05 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Zack Weinberg
21:48 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Bill Northcott
21:25 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Björn Haase
21:15 Re: [wwwdocs] Simplify release process a bit (was: GCC 3.4.4 Released) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:15 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Björn Haase
20:55 [wwwdocs] Simplify release process a bit (was: GCC 3.4.4 Released) Gerald Pfeifer
20:02 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Richard Henderson
19:40 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Jan Hubicka
19:25 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Jonathan Wakely
19:00 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Joe Buck
18:46 fixincludes running too often? Diego Novillo
18:40 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Richard Henderson
18:24 RE: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Dave Korn
18:15 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Jan Hubicka
18:08 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Mike Stump
17:42 Re: Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Jan Hubicka
17:15 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Mark Mitchell
17:12 Re: Problems building gcc on my mandrake Jonathan Wakely
16:55 Re: GCC 3.4.4 Released Joe Buck
16:48 RE: GCC 3.4.4 Released Dave Korn
16:38 Re: GPU-aware compiling? Florian Weimer
16:35 Problems building gcc on my mandrake Mehul
16:24 GCC 3.4.4 Released Mark Mitchell
16:01 Re: typo in french error message Segher Boessenkool
15:45 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to 5339 bytes Giovanni Bajo
15:40 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to 5339 bytes Etienne Lorrain
15:32 Re: typo in french error message Boris Mansencal
15:29 Bootstrap failure for target AVR, probably linked to Patch "2005-05-19 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>" Björn Haase
15:23 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibc version Mike Hearn
15:23 Re: GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to5339 bytes Falk Hueffner
15:20 Re: typo in french error message E. Weddington
15:18 Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Ian Lance Taylor
15:17 Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Ian Lance Taylor
15:16 Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Paolo Carlini
15:13 Re: 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Paul Brook
15:06 'jules' locking libstdc++-v3 for > 15 minutes! Paolo Carlini
14:56 GCC-4.0 vs GCC-3.3.6 ia32 -Os: code size increase from 261 to 5339 bytes Etienne Lorrain
14:44 Re: powerpc64-linux bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
14:41 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Mark Mitchell
12:42 Re: subscription to gcc mailing list Haren Visavadia
12:37 subscription to gcc mailing list drugdesign
11:14 Re: GPU-aware compiling? Daniel Berlin
09:13 Re: GPU-aware compiling? Tomasz Chmielewski
08:49 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Paolo Carlini
08:08 Re: preprocessor/21250 and address of <built-in> Segher Boessenkool
08:08 Re: typo in french error message Segher Boessenkool
08:08 Re: GPU-aware compiling? Segher Boessenkool
07:02 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Paolo Bonzini
07:00 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Paolo Bonzini
06:56 Re: GCC 3.4.4 RC2 Marcin Dalecki
04:55 Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits Mark Mitchell
04:54 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Lloyd Dupont
04:23 Re: spec failure: unrecognized spec option ... Bill Northcott
02:09 -fstack-check harmful in main tread (on Linux) Waldek Hebisch
01:15 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion David Daney
00:25 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Andrew Pinski
00:12 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Lloyd Dupont
00:11 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Lloyd Dupont

May 19, 2005
23:53 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Andrew Pinski
23:49 Re: ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Mike Stump
23:09 ASM help needed... (on x86/windows/gcc) Lloyd Dupont
23:08 Re: libgcc_s.so.1 exception handling behaviour depending on glibcversion Jonathan Wilson
21:59 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Mike Stump
21:53 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Bryce McKinlay
21:24 Re: The VLIW bundle output questions Vladimir Makarov
20:08 Re: [rfc] mainline slush Richard Sandiford
20:06 The VLIW bundle output questions Ling-hua Tseng
19:58 Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only? Richard Sandiford
19:41 Re: [rfc] mainline slush David Daney
19:40 Re: Bootstrap Times Improvements? Gerald Pfeifer
19:26