gcc archive
date index for April, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

April 30, 2005

23:50	gcc-4.0-20050430 is now available	gccadmin
23:12	Re: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc	Paolo Carlini
23:06	Re: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc	Vladimir A. Merzliakov
22:49	FAIL: ext/stdio_sync_filebuf/wchar_t/12077.cc	Paolo Carlini
22:45	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Nix
21:28	GCC-3.3.6 prerelease for testing	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:50	Slow _bfd_strip_section_from_output	H. J. Lu
19:40	PATCH: Speed up ELF section merge	H. J. Lu
19:37	PATCH: Speed up AR for ELF	H. J. Lu
19:33	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Giovanni Bajo
19:24	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Eric Botcazou
19:22	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Giovanni Bajo
19:18	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Giovanni Bajo
19:15	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Giovanni Bajo
19:14	Re: building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris	Eric Botcazou
17:44	Re: GCC-3.3.6 release status	Roger Sayle
17:31	GCC-3.3.6 release status	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:15	Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea	Roger Sayle
15:11	Re: PPC 64bit library status?	Andrew Pinski
13:46	Re: PPC 64bit library status?	Andreas Schwab
12:55	Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits	Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
12:37	Re: libjava/3.4.4 problem	Thorsten Glaser
12:28	PPC 64bit library status?	Bill Northcott
12:14	Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea	tbp
11:25	Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea	Scott Robert Ladd
09:47	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
09:33	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
02:59	Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:03	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joe Buck
00:54	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
00:29	RE: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin	Amir Fuhrmann
00:17	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Daney
00:17	gcc-3.4-20050429 is now available	gccadmin
00:10	Re: Struggle with FOR_EACH_EDGE	Kazu Hirata
00:05	The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.2 is released	H. J. Lu

April 29, 2005

23:51	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Matt Thomas
23:32	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Hugh Sasse
22:58	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Henderson
22:24	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joe Buck
21:41	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
21:40	Re: libjava/3.4.4 problem (was Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29))	Andrew Pinski
21:39	Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)	Mark Mitchell
21:37	Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)	Joseph S. Myers
21:34	libjava/3.4.4 problem (was Re: GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29))	Thorsten Glaser
21:33	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Stan Shebs
21:02	Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits	Paolo Carlini
20:54	Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits	Joe Buck
20:52	Re: C54x port: some general technical questions	Joe Buck
20:35	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Henderson
20:11	Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits	Paolo Carlini
20:11	C54x port: some general technical questions	Jonathan Bastien-Filiatrault
20:04	Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits	Mark Mitchell
19:44	Re: Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits	Andrew Pinski
19:39	Backporting to 4_0 the latest friend bits	Paolo Carlini
19:35	Re: GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea	Uros Bizjak
19:33	Re: CC_REG: "Ian's cc0 replacement machinery", request for stage2 conceptual approval	Mark Mitchell
19:18	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
19:01	GCC 3.4.4 Status (2005-04-29)	Mark Mitchell
18:52	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joe Buck
18:43	Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu	Diego Novillo
17:30	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
17:29	GCC 4.0, Fast Math, and Acovea	Scott Robert Ladd
17:12	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
16:47	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joe Buck
16:32	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Diego Novillo
16:08	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Dan Kegel
16:08	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
15:36	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
15:21	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andreas Schwab
14:59	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
14:42	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:19	Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?)	Andrew Haley
14:16	Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?)	Scott A Crosby
12:02	i?86-*-sco3.2v5* / i?86-*-solaris2.10 / x86_64-*-*, amd64-*-*	Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
12:01	Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc	Olivier Hainque
10:57	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Lars Segerlund
10:48	Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0].	Joseph S. Myers
10:17	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Jakub Jelinek
10:16	Re: Testcase for loop in try_move_mult_to_index?	Zdenek Dvorak
10:06	Testcase for loop in try_move_mult_to_index?	Richard Guenther
09:47	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
09:44	Re: 'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?)	Andrew Haley
07:09	Tru64 5.1B gcc 4.0.0 build	Andrey Ivanov
05:05	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Jason Thorpe
04:44	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Jason Thorpe
04:06	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Peter Barada
03:30	'make bootstrap' oprofile (13% on bash?)	Scott A Crosby
00:50	Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin	James E Wilson
00:37	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Dan Nicolaescu

April 28, 2005

22:04	Re: different address spaces	Paul Schlie
21:50	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Dan Kegel
21:24	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
21:20	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
20:55	Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?	Mark Mitchell
20:32	Re: different address spaces	Martin Koegler
19:43	Re: different address spaces	Paul Schlie
19:30	Re: std::string support UTF8?	Zack Weinberg
19:11	Re: std::string support UTF8?	Andrew Pinski
19:07	std::string support UTF8?	Laurielle Lea
19:01	Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0].	Richard Guenther
18:55	Re: Ada test suite	Laurent GUERBY
18:42	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Hugh Sasse
18:31	successful build of GCC 4.0.0 on Mac OS 10.3.9 (bootstrap, Fortran95)	Bojan Antonovic
18:24	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Edelsohn
18:16	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
18:12	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
18:10	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joe Buck
18:08	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Devang Patel
18:03	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Matt Thomas
18:02	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Peter Barada
17:54	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
17:53	Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?	Joe Buck
17:53	Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?	Daniel Berlin
17:43	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Carlton
17:39	Re: Ada test suite	Janis Johnson
17:31	Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?	Steven Bosscher
17:26	Another ms-bitfield question...	Joern RENNECKE
17:23	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Devang Patel
17:22	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Marcin Dalecki
17:10	Re: different address spaces	Martin Koegler
17:00	Successful gcc4.0.0 build (MinGW i386 on WinXP)	Christian Ehrlicher
16:59	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
16:56	Re: Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?	Joe Buck
16:54	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Edelsohn
16:53	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Edelsohn
16:53	RE: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin	Amir Fuhrmann
16:47	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joe Buck
16:46	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joe Buck
16:45	Should there be a GCC 4.0.1 release quickly?	Steven Bosscher
16:38	Re: different address spaces	Paul Schlie
16:36	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
16:33	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
16:26	Re: [RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0].	Joseph S. Myers
16:24	gcc 4.0.0 test status on AIX 5.2	Eli Ben-Shoshan
16:24	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
16:21	gcc 4.0.0 build status on AIX 5.2	Eli Ben-Shoshan
16:17	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
16:10	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
16:09	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Edelsohn
16:03	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
15:58	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Peter Barada
15:44	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Gunther Nikl
15:41	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
15:01	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Gunther Nikl
14:35	[RFC][PATCH] C frontend: Emit &a as &a[0].	Richard Guenther
14:32	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Lars Segerlund
14:20	Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes	Joern RENNECKE
14:01	Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin	E. Weddington
13:58	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andreas Schwab
13:52	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Earnshaw
13:35	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
13:35	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Earnshaw
13:35	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Jacobowitz
13:31	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Earnshaw
13:28	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Earnshaw
11:32	[BENCHMARK] comparing GCC 3.4 and 4.0 on an AMD Athlon-XP 2500+	Rene Rebe
11:05	Re: Ada test suite	Laurent GUERBY
10:29	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Marcin Dalecki
10:20	Re: Ada test suite	Arnaud Charlet
10:08	Re: Ada test suite	Florian Weimer
10:03	RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Dave Korn
09:30	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Haley
08:10	Re: Ada test suite	Arnaud Charlet
08:03	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Karel Gardas
07:45	Ada test suite	Florian Weimer
07:33	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Thorsten Glaser
04:55	Global Objects initialization Problem.......	Satendra Pratap
03:53	Mike Stump added as Darwin maintainer	Joe Buck
03:21	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Zack Weinberg
03:10	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Peter Barada
03:07	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Zack Weinberg
02:28	Re: about madd instruction in mips instruction sets	James E Wilson
02:18	Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin	James E Wilson
01:59	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	Marcin Dalecki
01:58	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Marcin Dalecki
01:58	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Marcin Dalecki
01:58	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Marcin Dalecki
01:48	Re: GCC 4.0.0 build report on Fedora Core 3	James E Wilson
01:44	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Tom Tromey
01:17	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Marcin Dalecki
01:06	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Peter Barada
01:01	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Peter Barada
00:28	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Zack Weinberg
00:16	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
00:10	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Zack Weinberg

April 27, 2005

23:59	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
23:53	Re: [RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewer patterns with more embedded code?	James E Wilson
23:49	gcc-3.3-20050427 is now available	gccadmin
23:48	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Kegel
23:42	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Zack Weinberg
23:40	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Zack Weinberg
23:35	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Joe Buck
23:03	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Berlin
22:13	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Stan Shebs
21:40	Re: FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin	E. Weddington
21:35	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Pinski
21:31	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Paul Koning
21:30	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Mike Stump
21:26	Re: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin	Mike Stump
21:25	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Matt Thomas
21:11	FW: GCC Cross Compiler for cygwin	Amir Fuhrmann
21:07	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Mike Stump
21:04	Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]	James E Wilson
20:59	Re: different address spaces	Mike Stump
20:57	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Andrew Pinski
20:54	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Karel Gardas
20:52	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Paul Koning
20:51	Re: Build gcc-4.0.0	James E Wilson
20:50	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Diego Novillo
20:41	Re: folding after TER notes	Steven Bosscher
20:36	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Steven Bosscher
20:27	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	sjhill
20:07	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Paul Koning
20:04	different address spaces	Martin Koegler
19:57	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Steven Bosscher
19:53	Re: Build gcc-4.0.0	Mike Stump
19:45	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Tom Tromey
18:25	GCC 4.0.0 build report on Fedora Core 3	David Gressett
17:50	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Mark Mitchell
17:47	Re: Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent	Joe Buck
17:39	Re: gcc 4.0 miscompilation on sparc(32) with ultrasparc optmization	Rene Rebe
17:16	Re: folding after TER notes	Jeffrey A Law
17:16	Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous	Richard Guenther
16:52	Re: folding after TER notes	Jeffrey A Law
16:46	Dirac, GCC-4.0.0 and SIMD optimisations on x86 architecture	Anuradha Suraparaju
16:44	Re: Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent	Joe Buck
16:35	Re: folding after TER notes	Richard Henderson
16:34	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:34	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:33	Re: libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the-fvisibity-inlines	Benjamin Kosnik
16:31	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Earnshaw
16:29	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Earnshaw
16:24	Re: fold_indirect_ref bogous	Jeffrey A Law
16:19	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Edelsohn
16:02	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
15:56	RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Dave Korn
15:52	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Earnshaw
15:45	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Matt Thomas
15:32	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Edelsohn
15:29	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Jonathan Wakely
15:27	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:20	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
15:15	building gcc 4.0.0 on Solaris	Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
15:05	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Matt Thomas
15:00	RE: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Dave Korn
14:47	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
14:44	RE: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Dave Korn
14:41	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	David Edelsohn
14:40	Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()	Clemens Koller
14:20	fold_indirect_ref bogous	Richard Guenther
14:18	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:18	Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler error in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()	Andrew Pinski
14:18	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:16	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:14	Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()	Clemens Koller
14:11	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
13:59	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
13:59	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
13:57	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
13:55	Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compilererror in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()	Clemens Koller
13:50	Re: [bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler error in libm-test.c:ctanh_test()	Andrew Pinski
13:47	[bug] gcc-3.4-20050422 compiling glibc-2.3.5 internal compiler errorin libm-test.c:ctanh_test()	Clemens Koller
12:48	Re: folding after TER notes	Andrew MacLeod
12:32	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:28	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:18	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:15	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Neil Booth
12:14	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:09	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:07	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:56	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
11:55	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
11:34	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Andrew Haley
11:30	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Andrew Haley
11:26	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
11:16	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
10:38	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Andrew Haley
10:37	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Zack Weinberg
10:04	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Vincent Lefevre
09:49	gcc 4.0 miscompilation on sparc(32) with ultrasparc optmization	Rene Rebe
09:47	Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]	Andrew Haley
08:35	about madd instruction in mips instruction sets	zouq
08:23	Re: folding after TER notes	Jeffrey A Law
07:58	Protoize does not build with gcc 4.x	Andreas Krebbel
07:25	Free-Standing and Non-OS Dependent	Sriharsha Vedurmudi
06:58	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Dan Nicolaescu
06:56	Re: [RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewerpatterns with more embedded code?	Eric Christopher
06:40	Re: folding after TER notes	Zack Weinberg
06:36	folding after TER notes	Jeffrey A Law
06:24	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Zack Weinberg
06:12	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Matt Thomas
06:10	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Ian Lance Taylor
05:50	RE: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Gary Funck
05:45	[RFA] Which is better? More and simplier patterns? Fewer patternswith more embedded code?	Matt Thomas
05:41	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Matt Thomas
05:30	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Richard Henderson
05:04	Re: A plan for eliminating cc0	Paul Schlie
04:59	Re: A plan for eliminating cc0	Paul Schlie
03:40	Re: Build gcc-4.0.0	James E Wilson
02:57	Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Daniel Jacobowitz
02:50	GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?	Matt Thomas
02:29	Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types	Devang Patel
02:25	[PATCH] VAX: cleanup; move macros from config/vax/vax.h to normalin config/vax/vax.c	Matt Thomas
01:45	Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types	Daniel Jacobowitz
01:38	Re: Submission Status: CRX port ?	James E Wilson
00:55	Re: [PATCH] Debugging Vector Types	James E Wilson
00:41	Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with yourpatch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]	James E Wilson

April 26, 2005

23:30	RE: Ada and bad configury architecture.	Gary Funck
23:08	Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c)	Geoffrey Keating
23:08	Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc	Geoffrey Keating
22:20	Re: A plan for eliminating cc0	Alexandre Oliva
22:07	Re: A plan for eliminating cc0	Alexandre Oliva
22:02	Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces)	James E Wilson
21:43	Re: Where did the include files go?	James E Wilson
20:15	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Zack Weinberg
20:03	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Bruce Lilly
19:06	Re: libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the -fvisibity-inlines	Paolo Carlini
18:58	libstdc++ problem after compiling gcc-4.0 with the -fvisibity-inlines	Panagiotis Papadakos
18:32	Re: sjlj exceptions?	Mike Stump
18:02	Re: Re[2]: object code execution statistics	James E Wilson
17:55	RE: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)	Gary Funck
17:50	Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)	Bruce Lilly
16:32	Re: object code execution statistics	Joe Buck
15:59	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:13	Re: EABI stack alignment for ppc	Olivier Hainque
15:10	Re: New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Joseph S. Myers
15:06	Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Vladimir Makarov
14:46	New gcc 4.0.0 warnings seem spurious	Bruce Lilly
14:16	RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Jon Beniston
14:07	Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Nathan Sidwell
13:49	Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	David Edelsohn
13:42	RE: EABI stack alignment for ppc	Dave Korn
13:42	Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Vladimir Makarov
13:33	Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)	Bernd Jendrissek
13:25	EABI stack alignment for ppc	Olivier Hainque
12:44	RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Richard Earnshaw
12:40	Build report for AIX 5.1	Mario Linke
12:28	Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Nathan Sidwell
12:13	RE: Free-Standing Implementation	Dave Korn
11:52	RE: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Jon Beniston
11:40	Free-Standing Implementation	Sriharsha Vedurmudi
11:29	Re: Regression involving COMMON(?)	Nathan Sidwell
10:59	Re: Regression involving COMMON(?)	Paul Thomas
10:57	Re: Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Nathan Sidwell
10:50	Re: Side-effect latency in DFA scheduler	Nathan Sidwell
08:59	Re[2]: object code execution statistics	Sergei Tovpeko
08:01	sjlj exceptions?	Thorsten Glaser
06:57	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Zdenek Dvorak
06:39	Successful Build Report for GCC 4.0.0 C and C++	Simon G Best
05:02	Re: Regression involving COMMON(?)	Andrew Pinski
04:16	Re: Fixing of bug 18877	James E Wilson
03:46	Ada and bad configury architecture.	Nathanael Nerode
02:38	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
02:37	Re: object code execution statistics	James E Wilson
02:32	Re: gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning	James E Wilson
01:18	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Andrew MacLeod
01:15	Re: tips on debugging a GCC 3.4.3 MIPS RTL optim problem?	James E Wilson
00:54	Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)	Zack Weinberg
00:48	Re: c54x port	James E Wilson
00:45	Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)	Andrew Pinski
00:43	Re: about how to write makefile.in config-lang.in for a frontend	James E Wilson
00:41	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Zdenek Dvorak
00:40	Re: benchmark call malloc a lot?	James E Wilson
00:36	Re: gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)	Sebastian Biallas
00:35	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
00:32	Re: spill_failure	James E Wilson
00:26	Re: Stack frame question on x86 code generation	James E Wilson
00:15	gcc 4.0.0 optimization vs. id strings (RCS, SCCS, etc.)	Bruce Lilly
00:02	Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves	James E Wilson
00:01	Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html	Giovanni Bajo

April 25, 2005

23:23	Re: gcc-4.0.0 build problem on solaris	James E Wilson
23:19	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Andrew MacLeod
23:18	Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions	James E Wilson
23:02	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
22:36	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Andrew MacLeod
22:36	Re: Where did the include files go?	Mike Stump
22:30	Where did the include files go?	Øystein Johansen
22:28	Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?	H. J. Lu
21:56	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
20:33	Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418	Sebastian Biallas
20:32	Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?	H. J. Lu
20:28	Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418	James E Wilson
20:22	Re: The subreg question	James E Wilson
19:38	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
19:37	Side-effect latency in DFA scheduler	Jon Beniston
19:34	Store scheduling with DFA scheduler	Jon Beniston
19:06	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Zdenek Dvorak
19:05	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Andrew MacLeod
18:59	Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?	Richard Kenner
18:38	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
18:35	Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?	Steve Ellcey
18:07	Re: Build of GCC 4.0.0 successful	Janis Johnson
17:09	Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces)	Joseph S. Myers
16:38	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Andrew MacLeod
16:21	Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed for different address spaces)	Martin Koegler
16:20	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
16:02	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
15:47	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Andrew MacLeod
15:33	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
15:30	Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces	Paul Schlie
15:22	Re: Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed fordifferent address spaces)	Joseph S. Myers
15:11	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Rainer Orth
15:08	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Jeroen Scheerder
15:08	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Andrew MacLeod
15:06	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:06	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Rainer Orth
15:05	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Jeroen Scheerder
15:01	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:58	Propagating attributes for to structure elements (needed for different address spaces)	Martin Koegler
14:53	tree-cleanup-branch is now closed	Diego Novillo
14:26	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Richard Earnshaw
14:10	Re: how small can gcc get?	Paul Koning
13:42	Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes	Joern RENNECKE
12:39	RE: Register allocation in GCC 4	Jon Beniston
11:38	Successful gcc4.0.0 build (Redhat 9. Kernel 2.4.25)	Jeff Clifford
11:23	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Rainer Orth
11:12	Re: Register allocation in GCC 4	Nathan Sidwell
11:08	Re: Register allocation in GCC 4	Nathan Sidwell
10:35	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Jeroen Scheerder
10:28	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Rainer Orth
10:25	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Rainer Orth
09:57	Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces	Etienne Lorrain
09:55	Register allocation in GCC 4	Jon Beniston
09:13	Submission Status: CRX port ?	Paul Woegerer
08:53	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Steven Bosscher
08:48	Re: Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Zdenek Dvorak
07:48	Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?	Nathan Sidwell
06:13	object code execution statistics	Sergei Tovpeko
04:36	gcc-4.0 non-local variable uses anonymous type warning	William S Fulton
03:58	Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces	Paul Schlie
01:57	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Mark Mitchell
01:30	tips on debugging a GCC 3.4.3 MIPS RTL optim problem?	Gary Funck
01:03	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Joe Buck
00:32	GCC 4.0.0: (mostly) successful build and installation on GNU/LinuxPowerPC	Luca Saiu

April 24, 2005

22:53	GCC 4.0.0 bootstrap success	Aaron Wilcox
22:52	CC_REG: "Ian's cc0 replacement machinery", request for stage 2 conceptual approval	Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:19	Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418	Sebastian Biallas
22:07	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Melissa O'Neill
21:27	Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu	Diego Novillo
20:41	RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html	Gerald Pfeifer
19:45	Merging stmt_ann_d into tree_statement_list_node	Kazu Hirata
19:43	Re: how small can gcc get?	Florian Weimer
19:39	[wwwdocs] PATCH for GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes	Gerald Pfeifer
19:12	Re: how small can gcc get?	Mike Stump
18:20	gcc-4.1-20050424 is now available	gccadmin
17:36	Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu	Andreas Jaeger
17:30	Re: how small can gcc get?	Philip George
17:00	Re: how small can gcc get?	Dale Johannesen
16:55	Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu	Diego Novillo
16:52	Fixing of bug 18877	Martin Koegler
16:21	Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?	H. J. Lu
15:58	Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu	Andreas Jaeger
14:40	Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces	Martin Koegler
13:43	Re: how small can gcc get?	Mike Stump
09:35	Re: Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?	Nathan Sidwell
06:59	about how to write makefile.in config-lang.in for a frontend	zouq
06:58	One fully and one partially successful build	Jeroen Scheerder
04:51	Re: spill_failure	Ian Lance Taylor
04:22	Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c)	Ian Lance Taylor
03:15	benchmark call malloc a lot?	Zhenyu Guo
02:08	Is there a way to specify profile data file directory?	H. J. Lu
01:22	Re: [RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c)	Stuart Hastings
00:57	Re: c54x port	Bryan Richter
00:51	Re: spill_failure	Rajkishore Barik
00:43	[RFA] Invalid mmap(2) assumption in pch (ggc-common.c)	Matt Thomas
00:05	how small can gcc get?	Philip George

April 23, 2005

23:47	Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0	Andrew Pinski
23:45	gcc-4.0-20050423 is now available	gccadmin
23:40	Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0	Hans-Peter Nilsson
23:29	Re: Obsoleting c4x last minute for 4.0	Hans-Peter Nilsson
22:37	Re: spill_failure	Steven Bosscher
22:20	spill_failure	Rajkishore Barik
19:00	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Jeroen Scheerder
18:55	Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces	Paul Schlie
18:37	Re: Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces	Richard Henderson
18:27	Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces	Paul Schlie
18:09	Stack frame question on x86 code generation	Gang-Ryung Uh
17:55	Re: tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:18	Proposal: GCC core changes for different address spaces	Martin Koegler
16:48	Re: Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Joseph S. Myers
16:33	Built gcc 4.0.0, without C++ support	Jeroen Scheerder
16:24	Re: tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend	Nathan Sidwell
16:22	Re: The subreg question	Ling-hua Tseng
16:07	tcc_statement vs. tcc_expression in the C++ frontend	Ian Lance Taylor
14:56	Re: different address spaces	Paul Schlie
14:17	Re: A bug in the current released GCC 4.0.0	Andrew Pinski
14:16	Re: different address spaces	Paul Schlie
13:55	Re: writeable-strings (gcc 4 and lower versions) clarification	Mike Stump
13:29	Re: Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu	Diego Novillo
13:03	gcc 4.0.0 successful build	Jan Okrasinski
10:32	A bug in the current released GCC 4.0.0	聂久焘
08:26	Re: GCC 4.0.0 fsincos?	Uros Bizjak
08:09	Build gcc-4.0.0	Jean-Paul Rigault
07:35	writeable-strings (gcc 4 and lower versions) clarification	sting sting
07:07	Mainline Bootstrap failure on x86-64-linux-gnu	Andreas Jaeger
06:30	GCC 4.0.0 fsincos?	Patrick Mitran
01:18	gcc-4.0.0 build problem on solaris	Don Lindsay
01:17	Re: different address spaces	Zack Weinberg
00:52	Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410	Nick Rasmussen
00:02	gcc-3.4-20050422 is now available	gccadmin
00:01	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)	James E Wilson

April 22, 2005

23:56	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	Joe Buck
22:56	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)	Paul Schlie
22:09	Build and test results for GCC 4.0.0	Joe Buck
21:56	Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c	Steve Kargl
21:56	Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions	Björn Haase
20:45	Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves	Greg McGary
20:08	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	Mike Stump
20:04	Re: Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418	James E Wilson
19:53	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	Eric Botcazou
19:52	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	Zack Weinberg
19:46	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	Mike Stump
19:44	Re: GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes	Mark Mitchell
19:20	Re: GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes	Toon Moene
18:36	Build of GCC 4.0.0 successful	William Beebe
18:35	gcc 4.0 build status	Bruce Lilly
18:15	Re: c54x port	Bryan Richter
18:08	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)	James E Wilson
16:57	Re: c54x port	Joe Buck
16:45	Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed	Joe Buck
16:40	Re: gpg signatures on tar/diff	Joe Buck
15:49	Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c	Steve Kargl
14:32	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
14:27	Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c	Kazu Hirata
13:31	RE: i want to join	Dave Korn
12:41	i want to join	Bingguang Peng
11:59	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)	Paul Schlie
11:10	Re: Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]	Andrew Pinski
10:52	Re: Java field offsets [was; GCC 4.0 RC2 Available]	Andrew Haley
10:28	Java failures [Re: 75 GCC HEAD regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2005-04-20T14:39:10Z.]	Andrew Haley
09:59	RE: Help installing & using GCC	Dave Korn
09:12	Re: Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c	Rainer Orth
07:59	gpg signatures on tar/diff	Adrian von Bidder
07:49	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	James E Wilson
07:15	GCC 4.0.0 has been released	Mark Mitchell
07:13	GCC 4.0 branch open for regression fixes	Mark Mitchell
07:10	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)	James E Wilson
06:58	Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions	James E Wilson
06:45	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)	James E Wilson
06:39	Re: SMS in gcc4.0	Steven Bosscher
06:28	Re: emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves	James E Wilson
04:33	Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed	Andrew Pinski
04:25	Re: gcc-4.0.0 build failed	Eric Lemings
04:19	gcc-4.0.0 build failed	Eric Lemings
03:57	Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	Andrew Pinski
02:59	GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9	shrao
02:27	Re: SMS in gcc4.0	Canqun Yang
02:21	Help installing & using GCC	Zhaohui Zhou
02:09	Regression on mainline in tree-vrp.c	Steve Kargl
01:07	c54x port	Bryan Richter
00:15	Re: Help Required on HP-UX 11.0 & 11.11	John David Anglin

April 21, 2005

21:21	Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?	Steve Ellcey
21:00	Re: IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?	Richard Kenner
20:52	IA64 Pointer conversion question / convert code already wrong?	Steve Ellcey
20:31	Re: Java field offsets	Jason Merrill
19:06	Re: 转发: Call into a function?	James E Wilson
18:59	Re: [gnu.org #232057] FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #2	John Sullivan via RT
18:58	Re: [gnu.org #232052] FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1	John Sullivan via RT
16:14	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler erroratdwarf2out.c:8362)	Paul Schlie
14:34	Some small optimization issues with gcc 4.0 20050418	Sebastian Biallas
14:25	Re: What's the fate of VARRAY_*?	Nathan Sidwell
14:21	What's the fate of VARRAY_*?	Kazu Hirata
14:18	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Nix
14:14	Help Required on HP-UX 11.0 & 11.11	Kumar, Vijay
13:53	Re: RFA: .opt files for x86, darwin and lynxos	Kelley Cook
13:38	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Kate Minola
13:36	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	John David Anglin
10:13	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362)	Björn Haase
09:45	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362)	Martin Koegler
08:11	Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions	Björn Haase
06:36	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Nix
06:11	Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2	Denis Vlasenko
03:59	Mike Stump named as Objective-C/Objective-C++ maintainer	Joe Buck
03:42	转发: Call into a function?	Zhenyu Guo
03:32	Re: Call into a function?	James E Wilson
03:21	Re: Call into a function?	Daniel Jacobowitz
03:16	Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2	James E Wilson
03:11	Re: Unnesting of nested subreg expressions	James E Wilson
02:50	Re: RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes	James E Wilson
02:49	Re: RFA: .opt files for x86, darwin and lynxos	Richard Kenner
02:40	Call into a function?	Zhenyu Guo
02:21	Re: static inline functions disappear - incorrect static initialiser analysis?	James E Wilson
01:42	Re: different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error atdwarf2out.c:8362)	James E Wilson
00:56	emit_no_conflict_block breaks some conditional moves	Greg McGary

April 20, 2005

23:43	gcc-3.3-20050420 is now available	gccadmin
23:16	Typo in online GCJ docs.	Thomas Zander
21:21	Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?	tbp
20:25	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Daniel Jacobowitz
19:16	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Nix
18:50	Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?	Øystein Johansen
18:33	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Paul Schlie
18:25	Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?	Andrew Pinski
18:22	Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?	Kelley Cook
18:14	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Paul Schlie
17:23	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Jeffrey A Law
16:52	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Eric Botcazou
16:26	Re: Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?	Ian Lance Taylor
15:33	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Jeffrey A Law
15:25	Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html	Alec Voropay
15:21	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Eric Botcazou
15:17	Hey? Where did the intrinsics go?	Øystein Johansen
15:12	Re: GCC 3.3 status	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:01	Re: makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..}	Karl Berry
10:57	Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html	Gerald Pfeifer
10:56	makeinfo 4.8 generates non-standard HTML for @emph{..@samp{..}..}	Gerald Pfeifer
10:39	Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html	Patrick McFarland
10:12	Re: Packaging error in 4.0RC1 docs? [was RE: Problem compiling GCC4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 ]	Gerald Pfeifer
10:12	GCC 3.3 status	Giovanni Bajo
10:12	Re: <A> at web: /install/specific.html	Gerald Pfeifer
06:49	Re: i386 stack slot optimisation	Øyvind Harboe
06:21	Re: Whirlpool oopses in 2.6.11 and 2.6.12-rc2	Denis Vlasenko
04:45	Re: Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues	Dan Kegel
03:08	Re: 2 suggestions	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:47	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:36	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Geoff Keating
01:04	Java field offsets [was; GCC 4.0 RC2 Available]	Per Bothner
00:18	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Josh Conner
00:09	Re: Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues	Daniel Berlin

April 19, 2005

23:20	Re: i386 stack slot optimisation	James E Wilson
23:17	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
23:14	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
23:13	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
23:04	Unnesting of nested subreg expressions	Björn Haase
22:12	Re: i386 stack slot optimisation	Øyvind Harboe
21:49	Re: i386 stack slot optimisation	James E Wilson
21:37	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Eric Botcazou
21:27	Re: line-map question	Per Bothner
21:25	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Koning
21:04	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Robert Dewar
20:45	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Koning
20:33	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joe Buck
20:26	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Robert Dewar
20:05	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Jeffrey A Law
19:58	RFC: ms bitfields of aligned basetypes	Joern RENNECKE
19:50	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	Björn Haase
19:39	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Eric Botcazou
19:27	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Eric Botcazou
19:09	Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type	Devang Patel
19:04	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joe Buck
18:51	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joseph S. Myers
18:51	Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type	James E Wilson
18:40	Re: The subreg question	James E Wilson
18:30	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Andrew Haley
18:28	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Ken Raeburn
18:23	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Tom Tromey
18:10	Re: front-end tools for preprocessor / macro expansion	Tom Tromey
18:03	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Paul Schlie
17:42	Re: CPP inconsistency	Zack Weinberg
17:34	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Paul Schlie
17:06	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Andrew Haley
17:00	Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value	Daniel Berlin
16:50	Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value	Jerome Guitton
16:33	Re: register name for DW_AT_frame_base value	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:29	register name for DW_AT_frame_base value	Jerome Guitton
16:24	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joe Buck
16:21	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
16:20	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joseph S. Myers
16:13	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Richard Kenner
16:13	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joe Buck
16:09	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Jeffrey A Law
16:09	Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility	Peter FELECAN
16:04	Re: GCC superblock and region formation support	Daniel Berlin
16:03	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
16:03	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Andrew Haley
15:58	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
15:58	Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility	Joe Buck
15:57	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
15:56	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
15:54	Re: CPP inconsistency	Joe Buck
15:49	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
15:44	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
15:34	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Paolo Bonzini
15:31	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
15:22	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Andreas Tobler
15:18	Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility	Peter FELECAN
15:17	GCC superblock and region formation support	Robert Kidd
15:16	static inline functions disappear - incorrect static initialiseranalysis?	Daniel Towner
15:02	Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type	Devang Patel
14:59	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Gareth Elston
14:20	Re: libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility	Jakub Jelinek
13:33	Re: CPP inconsistency	Daniel Jacobowitz
13:28	CPP inconsistency	Etienne Lorrain
13:25	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Andrew Haley
13:19	Re: target_shift_truncation_mask for all shifts?!	Richard Sandiford
13:06	target_shift_truncation_mask for all shifts?!	Andreas Krebbel
12:26	libgcc_s.so 3.4 vs 3.0 compatibility	Peter FELECAN
11:45	Re: The subreg question	Ling-hua Tseng
10:56	Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0	Jonathan Larmour
10:50	Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis - Scalability issues	Virender Kashyap
09:15	different address spaces (was Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362)	Martin Koegler
07:53	Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0	Richard Sandiford
07:39	Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0	Zack Weinberg
07:29	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	James E Wilson
07:21	Re: MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0	Richard Sandiford
07:09	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Richard Sandiford
06:59	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Paolo Bonzini
06:53	Re: Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Eric Botcazou
06:16	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Eric Botcazou
06:02	Reload Issue -- I can't believe we haven't hit this before	Jeffrey A Law
05:09	Re: Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0...	Dan Kegel
05:01	Re: sync operations: where's the barrier?	Richard Henderson
04:23	Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type	Eric Christopher
04:18	Re: Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0...	Eric Christopher
03:35	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	James E Wilson
03:32	Problems with MIPS cross compiling for GCC-4.1.0...	Steven J. Hill
02:43	Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type	Devang Patel
02:41	Re: sync operations: where's the barrier?	Geoffrey Keating
02:16	Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type	Mike Stump
02:07	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:29	Re: [RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type	James E Wilson
01:25	Re: sync operations: where's the barrier?	David Edelsohn
01:21	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Andrew Pinski
01:07	Re: The subreg question	James E Wilson
01:07	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Geoffrey Keating
00:47	Re: compile error for gcc-4.0.0-20050410	James E Wilson
00:43	Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment	James E Wilson
00:36	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joe Buck
00:35	Re: ppc32/e500/no float - undefined references in libstdc++ _Unwind_*	James E Wilson
00:23	Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC?	Steven Bosscher
00:20	Re: Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS	James E Wilson
00:13	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joe Buck

April 18, 2005

23:26	Re: Can I comment out a GTY variable?	Geoffrey Keating
22:45	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Mike Stump
22:30	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	James E Wilson
22:18	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Julian Brown
22:17	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Robert Dewar
22:08	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Ken Raeburn
21:51	Re: Novell thinks you are spam	Andreas Schwab
21:47	sync operations: where's the barrier?	Geoffrey Keating
21:38	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Daniel Berlin
21:26	Novell thinks you are spam	Steven Bosscher
21:25	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Laurent GUERBY
21:08	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Joe Buck
20:47	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Laurent GUERBY
20:36	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Dan Nicolaescu
19:45	MIPS, libsupc++ and -G 0	Jonathan Larmour
19:26	Re: line-map question	Devang Patel
19:19	Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC?	Nicholas Nethercote
19:08	Re: Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC?	Steven Bosscher
19:06	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Steven Bosscher
18:54	Re: line-map question	Mike Stump
18:54	Unnecessary sign- and zero-extensions in GCC?	Nicholas Nethercote
18:44	i386 stack slot optimisation	Øyvind Harboe
18:36	Re: Can I comment out a GTY variable?	Andrew Pinski
18:11	Can I comment out a GTY variable?	H. J. Lu
17:42	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Richard Kenner
17:28	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Andreas Krebbel
17:04	Re: hot/cold vs glibc	Daniel Jacobowitz
16:55	line-map question	Devang Patel
16:48	Re: hot/cold vs glibc	Caroline Tice
16:29	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Daniel Berlin
15:42	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Roger Sayle
15:42	Re: Processor-specific code	Vincent Lefevre
15:35	hot/cold vs glibc	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:06	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Richard Kenner
15:03	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Richard Kenner
14:44	GCC 4.0 RC2 Available	Mark Mitchell
14:37	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Paolo Bonzini
14:35	missed mail	Aldy Hernandez
14:30	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Steven Bosscher
14:15	front-end tools for preprocessor / macro expansion	Henrik Sorensen
14:12	Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes	Mike Hearn
13:45	Re: libraries - double set	Eric Botcazou
13:37	libraries - double set	Ray Holme
12:50	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Richard Kenner
12:46	i386 stack slot optimisation	Øyvind Harboe
12:36	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Richard Kenner
11:09	Re: Processor-specific code	Joseph S. Myers
10:26	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
10:01	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Steven Bosscher
07:27	Re: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1	Marcin Dalecki
07:23	Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes	Marcin Dalecki
06:57	Re: Processor-specific code	FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
05:46	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Roger Sayle
05:44	Re: Processor-specific code	Geoffrey Keating
05:44	Re: Processor-specific code	Geoffrey Keating
05:44	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Geoffrey Keating
05:44	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Geoffrey Keating
03:02	Re: empty switch substituion doesn't erase matching switch?	Daniel Jacobowitz
02:56	RE: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1	Gareth Pearce
02:49	empty switch substituion doesn't erase matching switch?	Gary Funck
02:44	Re: Processor-specific code	Brooks Moses
02:43	Re: function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1	Andrew Pinski
02:40	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Steve Kargl
02:37	function name lookup within templates in gcc 4.1	Gareth Pearce
02:23	Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes	Dan Kegel

April 17, 2005

19:57	Re: Processor-specific code	FX Coudert
18:14	Re: How to -Werror in a fortran testcase?	Mike Stump
18:11	gcc-4.1-20050417 is now available	gccadmin
18:00	Re: Vectorizing my loops. Some problems.	Gerald Pfeifer
17:48	[RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointertarget type	Paul Schlie
17:03	[RFC] warning: initialization discards qualifiers from pointer target type	Devang Patel
16:48	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	Björn Haase
16:42	Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes	Mike Hearn
16:01	re: Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS...	Daniel Kegel
15:39	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Björn Haase
15:31	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2 Status	Eric Botcazou
14:26	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:20	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Jason Merrill
14:15	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Björn Haase
13:02	Re: The subreg question	Björn Haase
10:54	Re: How to -Werror in a fortran testcase?	Paul Brook
09:25	Re: Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS...	Giovanni Bajo
09:11	Re: Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS	James Tabor
09:01	The subreg question	Ling-hua Tseng
06:54	GCC 4.0 RC2 Status	Mark Mitchell
06:35	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Christian Joensson
06:04	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Peter Barada
05:17	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	James A. Morrison
05:10	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Tobias Schlüter
05:07	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	James A. Morrison
04:51	Problem with weak_alias and strong_alias in gcc-4.1.0 with MIPS...	Steven J. Hill
04:31	Re: C++ ABI mismatch crashes	Joe Buck
03:39	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Jack Howarth
03:33	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Branko Äibej
03:23	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Zack Weinberg
02:56	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Branko Äibej
02:48	Re: My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Richard Kenner
02:03	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Zack Weinberg
01:28	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Ian Lance Taylor

April 16, 2005

23:52	gcc-4.0-20050416 is now available	gccadmin
23:37	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Peter Barada
22:37	C++ ABI mismatch crashes	Mike Hearn
20:33	compile error for gcc-4.0.0-20050410	Guochun Shi
19:45	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Nathan Sidwell
18:33	How to -Werror in a fortran testcase?	Richard Guenther
18:18	My opinions on tree-level and RTL-level optimization	Roger Sayle
15:51	Re: Template and dynamic dispatching	Larry Evans
15:29	Re: Doubt : Help	Ian Lance Taylor
15:19	Re: Template and dynamic dispatching	Larry Evans
14:56	Re: implicit type cast problem of reference of ponter to const type	Jonathan Wakely
13:32	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	Martin Koegler
11:10	Re: 2 suggestions	Gerald Pfeifer
08:19	Templates and C++ embedded subsets	Robert Dewar
07:25	Doubt : Help	Sachin Vijay Sonawane
05:13	implicit type cast problem of reference of ponter to const type	Steve Yee
02:22	An old timer returns to the fold	Michael Meissner
01:36	Re: Template and dynamic dispatching	Robert Dewar
01:12	Re: Template and dynamic dispatching	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:47	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Robert Dewar
00:22	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:02	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	James E Wilson

April 15, 2005

23:58	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Marcin Dalecki
23:56	gcc-3.4-20050415 is now available	gccadmin
22:38	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Mike Stump
22:29	Re: Vectorizing my loops. Some problems.	Øystein Johansen
22:20	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Marcin Dalecki
22:03	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Koning
22:01	Vectorizing my loops. Some problems.	Øystein Johansen
22:00	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Mike Stump
21:55	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Marcin Dalecki
21:52	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Marcin Dalecki
21:37	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Mike Stump
21:20	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	E. Weddington
21:00	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	Ralf Corsepius
20:52	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Christopher Jefferson
20:07	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Peter Barada
19:39	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
19:24	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Joe Buck
19:21	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Mike Stump
19:19	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Mike Stump
19:08	Re: Objective-C++ Status	Mike Stump
19:05	rtx/tree calling function syntax	Chris Kirby
18:52	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Christopher Jefferson
18:50	Re: Processor-specific code	Vincent Lefevre
18:31	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Schlie
18:30	Re: Processor-specific code	Mike Stump
18:28	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Mike Stump
18:19	Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer	Diego Novillo
18:18	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Mike Stump
18:17	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Ian Lance Taylor
18:14	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Andrew Pinski
18:05	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Peter Barada
18:00	Re: inline-unit-growth trouble	Richard Guenther
17:56	Re: Processor-specific code	Paul Brook
17:55	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Michael N. Moran
17:43	Re: Processor-specific code	Vincent Lefevre
17:42	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Michael N. Moran
17:37	RE: Processor-specific code	Paul Koning
17:29	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Ian Lance Taylor
17:23	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	E. Weddington
17:23	Re: "make bootstrap" for cross builds	Janis Johnson
17:21	RE: Processor-specific code	Dave Korn
17:20	RE: Processor-specific code	Dave Korn
17:15	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	Andrew Haley
17:11	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	E. Weddington
17:08	RE: Processor-specific code	Richard Earnshaw
17:05	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:02	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	Dale Johannesen
16:57	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Peter Barada
16:57	RE: struct __attribute((packed));	Joseph S. Myers
16:56	RE: Processor-specific code	Paul Koning
16:53	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	Paul Koning
16:49	RE: Processor-specific code	Dave Korn
16:42	Re: Processor-specific code	Richard Earnshaw
16:39	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	E. Weddington
16:35	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	Paul Koning
16:35	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	E. Weddington
16:34	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Koning
16:28	RE: struct __attribute((packed));	Dave Korn
16:28	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	E. Weddington
16:22	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Schlie
16:19	Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer	Jeffrey A Law
16:10	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	E. Weddington
16:09	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Peter Barada
16:04	inline-unit-growth trouble	Andreas Krebbel
16:03	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	Paul Koning
15:45	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	Ralf Corsepius
15:41	Successful bootstrap of GCC 3.4.3 on i586-pc-interix3 (with one little problem)	Rob Hulswit
15:27	Re: struct __attribute((packed));	E. Weddington
15:07	struct __attribute((packed));	Ralf Corsepius
14:59	Re: Questions on CC	Nathan Sidwell
14:50	Re: Processor-specific code	Robert Dewar
14:44	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Ian Lance Taylor
14:39	re: some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3	Dan Kegel
14:39	Re: Processor-specific code	Richard Earnshaw
14:31	Questions on CC	Timothy Bowers
13:49	Re: Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment	Petar Penchev
13:24	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Koning
13:22	Re: Objective-C++ Status	James A. Morrison
12:53	Re: Stack and Function parameters alignment	Paul Brook
12:33	Stack and Function parameters alignment	Petar Penchev
11:35	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Michael N. Moran
11:12	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Michael N. Moran
10:55	[PATCH] RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dave Korn
10:25	ppc32/e500/no float - undefined references in libstdc++ _Unwind_*	Clemens Koller
10:14	Re: some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3	Kai Ruottu
08:51	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	arcjai
08:38	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Steven Bosscher
07:54	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Alexandre Oliva
07:54	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Jason Merrill
07:50	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:32	Re: Processor-specific code	FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
07:24	some problem about cross-compile the gcc-2.95.3	zouq
07:21	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Duncan Sands
07:09	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:04	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:53	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Alexandre Oliva
06:44	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Mark Mitchell
05:23	Re: "make bootstrap" for cross builds	Andrew Pinski
05:22	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Peter Barada
05:19	"make bootstrap" for cross builds	Ranjit Mathew
04:52	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Devang Patel
04:50	Objective-C++ Status	Douglas Charles
04:39	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Richard Henderson
03:48	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Marcin Dalecki
03:30	Re: [m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Ian Lance Taylor
03:11	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Diego Novillo
02:32	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Alexandre Oliva
00:26	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Mark Mitchell

April 14, 2005

23:14	Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from	Wolfgang Bangerth
23:10	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Richard Henderson
23:06	Re: Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from	Andrew Pinski
23:05	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Mark Mitchell
23:04	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Mark Mitchell
22:51	Mainline bootstrap failure in tree-ssa-pre.c:create_value_expr_from	Wolfgang Bangerth
22:28	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	John David Anglin
22:09	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	E. Weddington
22:06	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Koning
22:06	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Laurent GUERBY
22:02	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	James E Wilson
21:56	Joseph appointed i18n maintainer	Gerald Pfeifer
21:42	Re: 2 suggestions	Gerald Pfeifer
21:33	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Jason Merrill
21:30	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Jason Merrill
21:06	Cross Compile PowerPC for ReactOS	James Tabor
20:48	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Robert Dewar
20:33	Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	Diego Novillo
20:32	Re: Processor-specific code	Joseph S. Myers
20:29	Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	H. J. Lu
20:29	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Diego Novillo
20:27	Re: 2 suggestions	Georg Bauhaus
20:26	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:25	Re: 2 suggestions	Georg Bauhaus
20:14	Re: Processor-specific code	Richard Henderson
20:08	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:04	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Diego Novillo
19:57	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Robert Dewar
19:41	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Michael N. Moran
19:36	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Michael N. Moran
19:35	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Gerald Pfeifer
19:30	Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	Diego Novillo
19:26	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Michael N. Moran
19:20	Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	Mark Mitchell
19:05	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Mark Mitchell
19:00	Re: Processor-specific code	Andrew Pinski
18:22	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Alexandre Oliva
17:47	Re: Processor-specific code	Steve Kargl
17:35	Re: Processor-specific code	Richard Henderson
17:25	Re: ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so	Diego Novillo
17:24	Re: ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so	Richard Henderson
17:22	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
17:20	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Joseph S. Myers
17:12	Re: 2 suggestions	Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:02	Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410	Dale Johannesen
16:56	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Jason Merrill
16:54	Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	H. J. Lu
16:50	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Richard Henderson
16:47	Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	Diego Novillo
16:42	Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410	Andrew Pinski
16:42	Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410	Andrew Pinski
16:15	Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	Jon Grimm
16:12	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Nathan Sidwell
15:58	Re: 2 suggestions	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
15:40	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Jason Merrill
15:34	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Kate Minola
15:28	Re: Processor-specific code	FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
15:26	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Mark Mitchell
15:15	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	David Edelsohn
15:14	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Alexandre Oliva
14:59	Re: 2 suggestions	Gerald Pfeifer
14:57	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Kate Minola
14:55	Re: Processor-specific code	Steve Kargl
14:42	Processor-specific code	FranÃois-Xavier Coudert
14:31	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Paul Koning
14:31	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
14:28	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:21	[m68k]: More trouble with byte moves into Address registers	Peter Barada
14:13	Re: Heads-up: volatile and C++	Michael N. Moran
13:41	Re: libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	Diego Novillo
13:40	ld segfaults on ia64 trying to create libgcj.so	Diego Novillo
13:38	RE: install	Dave Korn
13:34	libstdc++ link failures on ppc64	Diego Novillo
12:45	Re: install	Gerald Pfeifer
12:36	install	Master Faris
12:35	install	Master Faris
12:24	Heads-up: volatile and C++	Jason Merrill
12:05	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	Daniel Jacobowitz
11:02	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	Martin Koegler
10:05	Re: reload-branch created	Ulrich Weigand
09:13	RE: 2 suggestions	Dave Korn
09:12	RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dave Korn
09:12	RE: 2 suggestions	Dave Korn
08:51	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Richard Sandiford
07:37	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	Bernardo Innocenti
06:21	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Jakub Jelinek
06:07	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Eric Botcazou
06:02	re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410	Dan Kegel
06:02	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
06:02	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Mark Mitchell
02:41	Re: unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410	Michael Matz
01:34	Re: Help me about C language Specification	Mike Stump
01:31	unreducable cp_tree_equal ICE in gcc-4.0.0-20050410	Nick Rasmussen
01:05	Re: 2 suggestions	Georg Bauhaus
01:03	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Tom Tromey
00:11	Re: 2 suggestions	Kaveh R. Ghazi

April 13, 2005

23:58	gcc-3.3-20050413 is now available	gccadmin
23:24	Re: 2 suggestions	Gerald Pfeifer
22:30	Re: Basic block reordering algorithm	Steven Bosscher
22:26	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
21:49	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Paul Jarc
21:47	Re: FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1	James E Wilson
21:17	Re: Tree-ssa dead store elimination	Andrew Pinski
21:13	Tree-ssa dead store elimination	Pat Haugen
20:55	Re: internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	James E Wilson
20:52	Re: Basic block reordering algorithm	Pat Haugen
20:51	Re: [PATCH] Cleanup fold_rtx, 1/n	Steven Bosscher
19:28	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	James E Wilson
19:21	Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions	Andrew Pinski
19:19	Re: [PATCH] Cleanup fold_rtx, 1/n	Roger Sayle
19:10	Re: Basic block reordering algorithm	Steven Bosscher
18:46	Re: Basic block reordering algorithm	Pat Haugen
18:22	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andi Kleen
18:09	FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #2	Chris Miller
18:09	FW: [gnu.org #232014] GNU Mailing Lists Question #1	Chris Miller
18:02	FW: GNU Mailing Lists Question #1	Chris Miller
16:18	Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions	Chris Kirby
16:07	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:56	Re: GCC Cross Compilation	E. Weddington
14:40	Re: Basic block reordering algorithm	Steven Bosscher
14:08	Re: -finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions	Andrew Pinski
14:06	-finstrument-functions and C++ exceptions	Chris Kirby
13:51	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
13:31	Re: Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn??	Steven Bosscher
13:27	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Ian Lance Taylor
13:26	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
13:21	Re: Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn??	Vladimir N. Makarov
13:00	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
12:21	Re: exceptions with longjmp (perhaps i am too stupid)	Andrew Haley
12:07	exceptions with longjmp (perhaps i am too stupid)	Georg Steffers
11:48	Haifa scheduler question: the purpose of move_insn??	Steven Bosscher
10:19	RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dave Korn
09:52	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Jakub Jelinek
09:50	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Pinski
09:39	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Jason Merrill
09:30	GCC Cross Compilation	Vishal Kothari
09:24	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
08:59	Re: Help me about C language Specification	Jonathan Wakely
08:30	Help me about C language Specification	thanh tuan
08:10	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	Bernardo Innocenti
07:44	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	arcjai
07:21	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Bernardo Innocenti
07:07	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Bernardo Innocenti
06:52	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	Bernardo Innocenti
06:48	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Richard Sandiford
06:28	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	Bernardo Innocenti
05:41	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Ranjit Mathew
05:00	Re: About the number of DOM's iterations.	Jeffrey A Law
04:32	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
04:23	Re: RFC:Updated VEC API	Mark Mitchell
03:41	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Ian Lance Taylor
03:19	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Ian Lance Taylor
01:00	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Per Bothner
00:33	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Joseph S. Myers
00:31	Re: RTL code	James E Wilson
00:24	Re: gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources]	Mike Stump
00:12	Re: gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency importanton AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources]	Nicholas Nethercote
00:07	Re: HEAD regression: All java tests are failing with an ICE whenoptimized	James E Wilson

April 12, 2005

23:48	Re: RFC:Updated VEC API	Daniel Berlin
23:28	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Per Bothner
23:16	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Per Bothner
22:21	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Thomas Fitzsimmons
22:18	Basic block reordering algorithm	Pat Haugen
22:11	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Wielaard
21:52	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Bryce McKinlay
21:27	Re: PowerPC sections ?	James E Wilson
21:15	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Richard Sandiford
21:04	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Per Bothner
20:55	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Richard Sandiford
20:46	Re: ada build failure?	Laurent GUERBY
20:44	Re: New optimisation idea ?	Andrew Pinski
20:40	New optimisation idea ?	Christophe Jaillet
20:24	Re: ada build failure?	Graham Stott
20:11	ada build failure?	Richard Henderson
19:59	gcc cache misses [was: Re: OT: How is memory latency important onAMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources]	Karel Gardas
19:32	RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dave Korn
19:32	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
18:59	Re: GCC 4.0 RC2	Steven Bosscher
18:48	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Wielaard
18:43	RFC:Updated VEC API	Nathan Sidwell
18:42	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Daniel Kegel
18:37	About the number of DOM's iterations.	Kazu Hirata
18:34	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Daniel Jacobowitz
18:30	Re: about the parse tree	Mike Stump
18:23	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Per Bothner
18:15	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Wielaard
18:02	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Zack Weinberg
18:00	GCC 4.0 RC2	Mark Mitchell
17:55	Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compiling large C/C++ sources	Mike Stump
17:45	RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dave Korn
17:31	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Zack Weinberg
17:24	RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dave Korn
17:19	RE: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dave Korn
17:18	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dimitry Golubovsky
17:01	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Zack Weinberg
16:59	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Daniel Kegel
16:48	Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros	Zack Weinberg
16:36	Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer	Jeffrey A Law
16:36	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dimitry Golubovsky
16:34	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andi Kleen
16:05	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Devang Patel
15:59	Re: gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Devang Patel
15:55	Pinapa: A SystemC front-end based on GCC	Matthieu Moy
15:54	Re: Mainline has been broken for more than 3 days now	Caroline Tice
15:30	Packaging error in 4.0RC1 docs? [was RE: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0 ]	Dave Korn
15:22	RE: GCC 3.4.3	Dave Korn
15:15	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	David Edelsohn
15:14	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Kate Minola
14:40	RE: GCC 3.4.3	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
14:32	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Pinski
14:21	RE: GCC 3.4.3	Dave Korn
14:17	proposal: explicit context pointers in addition to trampolines in C frontend	Clifford Wolf
14:10	gcc for syntax check only (C): need to read source from stdin	Dimitry Golubovsky
14:00	RE: GCC 3.4.3	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
13:58	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	David Edelsohn
13:54	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Geoff Keating
13:54	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Geoff Keating
13:52	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Kate Minola
13:47	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
13:39	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Geoff Keating
13:38	Re: OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compilinglarge C/C++ sources	Karel Gardas
13:32	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
13:12	RE: GCC 3.4.3	Dave Korn
13:05	Mainline has been broken for more than 3 days now	Diego Novillo
12:45	Re: GCC 3.4.3	Ray Holme
12:21	internal compiler error at dwarf2out.c:8362	Martin Koegler
12:20	Re: 3.4.3 on Solaris9, boehm-gc probs.	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
12:16	Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Diego Novillo
11:40	Re: GCC 3.4.3	Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng
11:26	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
11:23	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Georg Bauhaus
11:17	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
10:54	Re: Patches for coldfire v4e	arcjai
10:49	Patches for coldfire v4e	arcjai
10:42	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Laurent GUERBY
10:35	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Laurent GUERBY
10:33	OT: How is memory latency important on AMD64 box while compilinglarge C/C++ sources	Karel Gardas
10:33	Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC	John David Anglin
10:25	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Giovanni Bajo
08:55	Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:42	Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros	Bernd Schmidt
08:18	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time	Andrew Pinski
08:11	Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Andrew Pinski
07:16	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time	Thorsten Glaser
07:10	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Paolo Bonzini
06:26	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Alexandre Oliva
06:23	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Ranjit Mathew
06:09	Re: Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC	Caroline Tice
06:02	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Eric Botcazou
05:13	Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu since 2005-04-09 20:41UTC	Kazu Hirata
05:09	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Alexandre Oliva
04:37	Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:00	Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:52	RTL code	Rajkishore Barik
03:15	about the parse tree	zouq
03:11	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
02:55	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Geoffrey Keating
02:09	Re: Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Diego Novillo
02:08	Re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction inX11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro (worksforme)	Roland Mainz
02:03	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Greg Schafer
01:33	Mainline build failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Gabriel Dos Reis

April 11, 2005

23:48	Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30	James E Wilson
23:38	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Julian Brown
23:10	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Julian Brown
22:42	successful bootstrap/install of GCC 4.0 RC1 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86	Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
22:33	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Per Bothner
21:51	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Per Bothner
21:30	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Eric Botcazou
21:09	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Mike Stump
21:08	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Richard Henderson
20:42	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Alexandre Oliva
20:05	Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	David Edelsohn
19:57	Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Andrew Pinski
19:55	Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Alexandre Oliva
19:43	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Eric Botcazou
19:34	Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?	Alexandre Oliva
19:25	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Jeffrey A Law
19:02	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Marcus Meissner
19:01	Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0	Kate Minola
18:49	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:41	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Richard Sandiford
18:16	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Daniel Kegel
18:04	re: GCC Cross Compilation	Daniel Kegel
17:53	GCC Cross Compilation	Vishal Kothari
17:14	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Pinski
17:09	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
17:04	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Jakub Jelinek
17:04	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Daniel Jacobowitz
17:02	RE: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Daniel Kegel
16:57	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Joe Buck
14:41	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
13:40	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andrew Haley
13:36	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Marcin Dalecki
13:22	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Georg Bauhaus
12:56	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Richard Guenther
12:50	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
12:44	Re: reload-branch created	Bernd Schmidt
12:20	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andrew Haley
12:12	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preservingorder of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andreas Schwab
12:09	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Nathan Sidwell
12:07	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:05	RE: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Rupert Wood
12:01	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andrew Haley
12:00	Re: gcc-3.4-20050401 BUG? generates illegal instruction in X11R6.4.2/mkfontscale/freetypemacro(worksforme)	Clemens Koller
11:58	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Nathan Sidwell
11:46	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andrew Haley
11:43	Re: reload-branch created	Bernd Schmidt
11:35	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:31	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order offunctions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Mostafa Hagog
11:18	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving orderof functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Nathan Sidwell
10:32	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andrew Haley
10:23	Re: Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Steven Bosscher
10:18	Getting rid of -fno-unit-at-a-time [Was Re: RFC: Preserving order of functions and top-level asms via cgraph]	Andrew Haley
09:31	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Andrew Haley
09:00	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Eric Botcazou
06:16	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Eric Botcazou
05:09	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Jakub Jelinek
02:41	Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?	Paul Schlie

April 10, 2005

22:57	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
22:53	Re: GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Eric Botcazou
22:30	Re: The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released	H. J. Lu
22:05	GCC 4.0 RC1 Available	Mark Mitchell
21:27	Re: The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released	Marcin Dalecki
20:48	Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2*	Gerald Pfeifer
19:26	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Eric Christopher
19:23	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Zack Weinberg
19:18	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Mark Mitchell
19:16	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Eric Christopher
19:13	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Thomas Koenig
19:03	Re: libiberty configure mysteries	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:09	gcc-4.1-20050410 is now available	gccadmin
17:43	The Linux binutils 2.16.90.0.1 is released	H. J. Lu
16:05	Re: libiberty configure mysteries	Ian Lance Taylor
15:07	Re: libiberty configure mysteries	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:59	Re: libiberty configure mysteries	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:15	Re: libiberty configure mysteries	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:09	libiberty configure mysteries	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:00	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Toon Moene
09:36	Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Laurent GUERBY
08:59	Propagating loop carried memory dependancies to SMS	Mostafa Hagog
06:35	Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Andreas Jaeger
03:23	Re: Semi-Latent Bug in tree vectorizer	Diego Novillo

April 09, 2005

23:43	gcc-4.0-20050409 is now available	gccadmin
23:13	Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Andreas Schwab
23:07	Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Laurent GUERBY
22:48	Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30	Laurent GUERBY
19:47	Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Eric Botcazou
19:46	Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Laurent GUERBY
19:40	GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Matthias Klose
18:51	Re: [Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handlejunk strings	Laurent GUERBY
17:22	Re: [Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handle junk strings	Richard Kenner
16:18	Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?	Paul Schlie
15:38	Re: Inline round for IA64	Richard Henderson
15:19	[Ada] PR18847 Ada.Numerics.xx_Random.Value does not handle junkstrings	Laurent GUERBY
14:53	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Christian Parpart
14:51	Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:42	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Diego Novillo
14:28	Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Richard Kenner
14:28	Re: GCC 4.0 Freeze	Christian Parpart
14:04	Re: Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux:tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands invisit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Andreas Schwab
13:19	Re: Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block?	Kenneth Zadeck
12:41	Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050409 gnat tools on sparc-linux: tree check: accessed operand 2 of view_convert_expr with 1 operands in visit_assignment, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1074	Christian Joensson
12:31	Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Richard Kenner
12:03	Re: Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block?	Jan Hubicka
12:03	Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?	Richard Kenner
11:59	Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?	Richard Kenner
11:58	Canonical form of the RTL CFG for an IF-THEN-ELSE block?	Steven Bosscher
10:26	Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Eric Botcazou
10:18	Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Laurent GUERBY
09:58	Re: GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Eric Botcazou
09:49	GCC 4.0 Ada Status Report (2005-04-09)	Laurent GUERBY
07:03	GCC 4.0 Freeze	Mark Mitchell
05:21	Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?	Richard Henderson
04:19	Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?	Paul Schlie
01:54	Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?	Diego Novillo
01:06	Re: Q: C++ FE emitting assignments to global read-only symbols?	Giovanni Bajo
00:14	gcc-3.4-20050408 is now available	gccadmin