This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR 20505

From: James E Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:57:45 -0800
Subject: Re: PR 20505
References: <42414AB9.1020504@codesourcery.com> <424A0B0B.4060901@specifixinc.com> <424A9B6A.703@codesourcery.com>

Nathan Sidwell wrote:

Being conservative I'd go for my patch on 4.0 and yours (if verified) on
mainline.

I'm fine with that. Have you actually written a patch yet? I don't see one in the bug report or in gcc-patches.

I found a complication with my patch (string constants) when bootstrapping, and I plan to fix it by reorganizing the code a bit, so my patch will definitately not be a good idea for the 4.0 branch when I am done. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

References:
- PR 20505
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: PR 20505
  - From: James E Wilson
- Re: PR 20505
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]