This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: A plan for eliminating cc0


> From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>
>> Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net> writes:
>> Might this likely work?  And if so, possibly be worthy of consideration to
>> enable the more efficient description and optimization of traditional cc0
>> target machines (and possibly be beneficial for other ISA's as well)?
> 
> It seems like it might work to me.  It might be a reasonable direction
> to move in down the road, if somebody does the work.

I'll try.

Do you suspect it's best to define an extended syntax for set, or possibly
just verify that multiple sets have equivalent source expressions, or
something in between or otherwise?






Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]