This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers onsparc64-linux...


On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 14:27 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2005, at 12:12 PM, Christian Joensson wrote:
> > Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.0 (Kashmir FC3) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre)  
> > sun4u:
> 
> > I get these failures and just would like to ping for any ideas what
> > might be wrong...
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c  -O0  assembly comparison
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-1.c  -O1  assembly comparison
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c  -O0  assembly comparison
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-2.c  -O1  assembly comparison
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c  -O0  assembly comparison
> > FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/static-3.c  -O1  assembly comparison
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-03/msg00025.html
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2005-03/msg00127.html
> 
> 

Doubtful it's directly related.
He's getting miscompares without -g, and his compiler is newer than my
patch.  If it was really the same problem, 
1. it would have either gone away or showed up with each patch
2. it would have only affected -g
3. it would have affected gcc.dg/pch/save-temps.c


--Dan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]