This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?


> Less to maintain is all I was hoping for.  I think the configure
> scripts (both libiberty's and gcc's) could be simplified quite a bit
> if we assumed a C89 compliant runtime library, as could libiberty.h
> and system.h.

Well, gcc can make assumptions libiberty can't, and as far as
libiberty's configure goes, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" seems to
be the best course.

I admit that cleaning up the includes intrigues me, but I also
hesitate to change that without completely understanding the OSs we
still need to support.

A target environment, for example, may use libiberty to *provide* c89
support functions for its runtime library.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]