This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Kazu Hirata <kazu at cs dot umass dot edu>
Cc: roger at eyesopen dot com, stevenb at suse dot de, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:38:20 +0000
Subject: Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
References: <20050322.111420.35015524.kazu@cs.umass.edu><20050322.113246.26278970.kazu@cs.umass.edu>

Kazu Hirata writes:
 > 
 > > I am wondering if we still need get_callee_fndecl in the presence of
 > > tree optimizers.  I think this function performs a form of constant
 > > propagation at a rather strange place.
 > 
 > Sorry for omitting you in the CC.
 > 
 > Once you fix java_get_callee_fndecl, perhaps we only need to call it
 > during inlining?

I guess that may be true, yes.  I'm not absolutely sure, but it sounds
right.

Andrew.

References:
- Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
  - From: Kazu Hirata
- Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
  - From: Kazu Hirata

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]