RE: Questions about trampolines

[Manuel Baez <mbaez at security dot cl>]

Please some moderator, remove me from this list, I'cant do it

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org]En nombre de
> Clifford Wolf
> Enviado el: Miercoles, 16 de Marzo de 2005 10:28
> Para: Joern RENNECKE
> CC: Robert Dewar; E. Weddington; ?yvind Harboe; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Asunto: Re: Questions about trampolines
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:50:32PM +0000, Joern RENNECKE wrote:
> > These can be provided in a separate module of the static 
> libgcc, together
> > with allocation and deallocation of individual trampolines 
> from the pool
> > (the latter has to be called from the epilogue of functions that use
> > initialize (and thus allocate) trampolines).
> 
> I also thought about that already.
> It's a good idea, but not good enough.  :-(
> 
> what's about longjmp(), gotos from nested functions to their 
> surrounding
> functions (with a complex calltree inbetween) and (c++) exceptions?
> 
> always preserving frame pointers, unrolling the stack frame 
> by frame and
> executing this epilogues might be possible - but I don't think that we
> really want to go this way..
> 
> yours,
>  - clifford
> 
> --
> SSSS PPPP L     The SPL Programming Language
> S    P  P L     http://www.clifford.at/spl/
> SSSS PPPP L     ----------------------------------------------------
>    S P    L     A statefull, simple, small, c-like, object oriented,
> SSSS P    LLLL  embeddable, feature rich, dynamic scripting language
>  
> Opinions expressed here are mine. And if you don't agree with 
> them, you
> are racist, sexist, elitist, imperialist, baptist and 
> possibly even right.
>  
>