This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warningabout returning a reference to a temporary

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:30:55 -0500
Subject: Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warningabout returning a reference to a temporary
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0503071108220.12023-100000@www.eyesopen.com><422CA252.9010004@codesourcery.com><200503072002.40924.stevenb@suse.de><422CA63A.4080709@codesourcery.com><Pine.LNX.4.61.0503071941330.5151@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><422CB031.9020603@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:49:05 -0800, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> IMO, if these are C++-only, it's relatively easy to deprecate these
> extension -- but I'd like to hear from Jason and Nathan, and also the user
> community before we do that.  Of all the extensions we've had, this one
> really hasn't been that problematic.

I agree it hasn't been problematic.  I suspect that part of the reason for
that is that it hasn't been used.  I would not object to deprecating the
syntax extension.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Roger Sayle
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]