This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:20:00 -0500
Subject: Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation
References: <200503101204.56741.stevenb@suse.de> <20050310112313.GA16354@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Mar 10, 2005, at 6:23 AM, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:

I think I will try the later fix today (mostly because I no longer
remember what exactly were the problems that lead me to introducing
the TREE_OVERFLOW check to is_gimple_min_invariant).


http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-12/msg00786.html
And yes the testcase still fails when you remove TREE_OVERFLOW from
is_gimple_min_invariant, at least it did three weeks ago when I tried
this.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

References:
- Strange missing tree constant propagation
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]