This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
*** PROBABLY SPAM *** Re: request for timings - makedepend
- From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
- To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:16:14 +0100
- Subject: *** PROBABLY SPAM *** Re: request for timings - makedepend
- References: <87vf83lvzx.fsf@codesourcery.com>
(a)
real 0m5.171s
user 0m4.346s
sys 0m0.518s
(b)
Athlon64 3000+ (2.0 GHz s754), 1GB RAM, 200 GB disk, SuSE Linux 9.2
8 month old. Today's Paris street price about 500 euros w/o taxes
(c)
automatic seems better
Laurent
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 00:07 -0800, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I'd appreciate it if y'all would do the following sequence of commands
> on your favorite machine:
>
> srcdir=/path/to/gcc/source/tree/
> $srcdir/configure
> make all-libcpp configure-gcc
> cd gcc
> make config.h tm.h
> time ../libcpp/makedepend -I. -I$srcdir/gcc -I$srcdir/libcpp/include \
> -I$srcdir/include \
> -V$srcdir/gcc:$srcdir/libcpp/include:$srcdir/include \
> $srcdir/gcc/*.c > depend
>
> and report (a) the numbers reported by the "time" command, (b) what
> sort of machine this is and how old, and (c) whether or not you would
> be willing to trade that much additional delay in an edit-compile-debug
> cycle for not having to write dependencies manually anymore.
>
> I do *not* want to see the "depend" file (but please don't use
> /dev/null, as this may give unrealistic numbers).
>
> For reference: I get
>
> real 0m14.108s
> user 0m5.240s
> sys 0m1.290s
>
> and I am currently leaning toward 'too slow'.
>
> Thanks,
> zw
>