This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo at libero dot it>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:01:44 +0100
- Subject: Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502241350470.2297-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <200502282156.44751.stevenb@suse.de> <20050301003307.GA15527@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <200503010138.54843.stevenb@suse.de> <20050301010357.GH22361@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
- Reply-to: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:03:57 +0100, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
> OK, I will put this higher in the TODO list (but this is not 4.0
> either). What was those less unrealistic tests? I remember seeing node
> removal in profiles, but edge removal comes first here. Looks like I
> finally recovered everything from disc crash so will have time to look
> into this in the rest of the week...
I see those functions high up in the profiles with tramp3d and leafify turned
on, too. I remember bugging you about this a few month ago...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00737.html
Richard.