gcc archive
author index for March, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

"하태준"

• 2005-03-16 04:31 RTL?
• 2005-03-29 11:47 i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end

zhongknocken

• 2005-03-28 12:37 Any SMS loop example?
• 2005-03-29 03:30 Re: Re: Any SMS loop example?

邹琼

• 2005-03-14 01:33 a problem about cross-compile for powerpc

Øyvind Harboe

• 2005-03-02 12:12 Difference between stack pointer and frame address during codegeneration
• 2005-03-02 17:32 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame address duringcodegeneration
• 2005-03-02 17:54 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame addressduringcodegeneration
• 2005-03-02 20:21 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frameaddressduringcodegeneration
• 2005-03-11 14:59 gcc.dg/20001117-1.c and callee cleanup
• 2005-03-13 20:23 Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 07:34 Re: Questions about trampolines

Björn Haase

• 2005-03-19 09:49 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-19 18:20 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-20 15:19 Re: [AVR] RTL prologue/epilogue

"하태준"

• 2005-03-04 04:05 I have a question for gcc front-end
• 2005-03-04 08:10 I have a question for gcc

Manuel Baez

• 2005-03-16 14:49 RE: Questions about trampolines

Aaron W. LaFramboise

• 2005-03-07 09:04 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-13 05:55 Non-bootstrap build status reports
• 2005-03-25 03:28 getopt.h getopt() decl broken for many targets

Ajoy K Thamattoor

• 2005-03-31 23:36 [Fwd: Re: compiler interpretation of *mptr++ = mptr]

Alan Lehotsky

• 2005-03-25 12:55 Re: reload question

Alan Modra

• 2005-03-07 06:15 Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance

Aldy Hernandez

• 2005-03-10 20:44 patch: document 8540 in -mcpu docs
• 2005-03-31 00:16 SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt

Alec Voropay

• 2005-03-01 10:25 <A> at web: /install/specific.html

Alexander Strange

• 2005-03-14 21:53 Re: Questions about trampolines

Alexandre Oliva

• 2005-03-07 16:55 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 06:29 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 07:32 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 16:47 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 23:23 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-15 19:54 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-23 18:35 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 08:11 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-26 10:45 bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?

Alf . Lacis

• 2005-03-23 23:36 Installation Instructions

Alfonso Urdaneta

• 2005-03-07 01:17 tag request

Amit Thakar

• 2005-03-17 13:21 problems compiling gcc-3.3.1

amylaar

• 2005-03-05 05:24 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-05 15:04 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question

anderson shin

• 2005-03-27 17:08 Gcc embedding issue of our commerical product

andre

• 2005-03-29 16:43 Gcc help

Andrea

• 2005-03-17 16:59 short int and conversions
• 2005-03-18 00:26 Re: short int and conversions

Andreas Schwab

• 2005-03-07 16:26 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 16:27 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-13 21:09 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 09:31 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-14 13:28 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 13:58 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 09:09 Re: Bootstrap failure in varasm.c at assemble_alias
• 2005-03-18 23:19 Re: Problem running optimized IA64 code that invokes hand-codedassembly language function

Andreas Tobler

• 2005-03-27 12:07 Re: Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx

Andrew Haley

• 2005-03-07 15:39 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-09 19:54 A plea for help
• 2005-03-22 08:17 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl.
• 2005-03-22 09:19 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl.
• 2005-03-22 16:38 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
• 2005-03-29 19:24 Re: Name of files and functions etc.

Andrew MacLeod

• 2005-03-18 02:17 Re: RFC: Changes in the representation of call clobbers

Andrew Muraco

• 2005-03-07 17:40 GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity
• 2005-03-10 22:28 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity
• 2005-03-11 00:59 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity

Andrew Pinski

• 2005-03-01 03:09 Re: GIV optimizations
• 2005-03-01 18:29 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-02 00:59 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-02 02:36 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 02:52 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-03 20:13 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-03 22:40 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-03 23:28 Re: instrumentation injection & trees
• 2005-03-04 03:42 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-05 01:37 Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance
• 2005-03-05 07:57 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-07 00:37 Re: GCC generating invalid assembly
• 2005-03-07 19:23 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 14:36 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-08 16:14 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-09 23:21 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-10 13:20 Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation
• 2005-03-11 19:25 Re: C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member
• 2005-03-13 14:36 Re: Non-bootstrap build status reports
• 2005-03-16 00:50 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support
• 2005-03-16 01:15 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support
• 2005-03-21 23:08 Licensing question about libobjc
• 2005-03-22 03:18 Re: java on darwin8?
• 2005-03-22 19:59 Re: GCC 4.0 pragma interface/implementation regression with templates
• 2005-03-25 00:40 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-25 01:20 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-28 17:52 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.
• 2005-03-29 15:42 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel
• 2005-03-29 15:48 Re: Name of files and functions etc.
• 2005-03-31 04:58 Re: about new_regalloc
• 2005-03-31 23:01 Re: What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ?

Anna Aret

• 2005-03-19 13:15 Build and test results: gcc-3.4.3 on Red Hat 8.0

aram bharathi

• 2005-03-18 09:59 help regarding ld
• 2005-03-22 07:26 gcc with arm -vfp instructions
• 2005-03-22 08:52 gcc and vfp instructions
• 2005-03-22 08:52 gcc and vfp instructions

Arnaud Charlet

• 2005-03-20 10:36 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION

Art Haas

• 2005-03-16 15:03 Installation into 'const' directory

Balaji S

• 2005-03-03 05:32 Target specific memory attributes from RTL
• 2005-03-12 07:24 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL

Ben Elliston

• 2005-03-05 12:25 Where did Acovea go?
• 2005-03-15 03:55 Re: documentation on writing testcases?
• 2005-03-15 04:01 Re: `make uninstall' and GCC
• 2005-03-22 22:07 Keep dwarf.h in sync?

Benjamin Herrenschmidt

• 2005-03-01 00:27 RE: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2005-03-16 03:38 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support

Benjamin Redelings I

• 2005-03-01 22:13 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-15 22:24 Re: PR 20225
• 2005-03-16 23:26 Bootstrap failure in varasm.c at assemble_alias

Bernardo Innocenti

• 2005-03-02 00:06 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-02 21:11 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-18 23:48 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion

Bernd Schmidt

• 2005-03-16 11:41 Re: reload question
• 2005-03-18 18:16 reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0)
• 2005-03-19 07:33 Re: reload-branch created
• 2005-03-19 15:23 Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions
• 2005-03-20 18:41 Re: reload-branch created

Bernd Trog

• 2005-03-02 22:02 [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32?
• 2005-03-06 12:13 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32?

Biagio Lucini

• 2005-03-23 16:35 [gomp] Broken gomp branch
• 2005-03-28 19:27 Re: [gomp] Broken gomp branch

Bob Wilson

• 2005-03-20 03:30 Re: For those who want to automatically generate predicates.md...

Bradley Lucier

• 2005-03-03 12:33 bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-04 03:39 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-26 15:00 Re: Heads up: 4.0 libjava failures on powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0

Brendon Costa

• 2005-03-31 08:04 Getting access to g++ tree from front end.

Canqun Yang

• 2005-03-01 03:04 Re: GIV optimizations
• 2005-03-04 02:19 Re: GIV optimizations
• 2005-03-26 01:06 [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-27 01:37 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-27 02:29 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-28 00:23 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-28 00:30 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-31 13:42 RE: SMS in gcc4.0

Carl van_Schaik

• 2005-03-19 07:51 gcc 3.4.3 bug C++/inlines/thumb

Caroline Tice

• 2005-03-01 19:12 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)

Chris Jefferson

• 2005-03-07 16:23 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 11:30 Re:[OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 11:30 Re:[OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))

Chris Lattner

• 2005-03-04 20:39 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-05 01:09 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-05 01:26 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-05 02:00 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning.

Christian Joensson

• 2005-03-03 12:37 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-03 15:43 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-03 22:39 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-05 12:30 SV: Where did Acovea go?
• 2005-03-15 22:22 [Ada] Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050315 on sparc-linux: a-except.adb: unhandled expression in get_expr_operands():
• 2005-03-18 16:10 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 for gcc 4.0.0 20050318 (prerelease) on sparc-linux
• 2005-03-18 16:21 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 for gcc 4.0.0 20050318 (prerelease) on sparc-linux
• 2005-03-28 20:13 assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux...
• 2005-03-29 07:44 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux...

Christopher Faylor

• 2005-03-12 06:52 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None".
• 2005-03-12 06:54 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None".

Clemens Koller

• 2005-03-24 10:58 gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt
• 2005-03-30 12:53 Re: gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt (solved)

Clifford Wolf

• 2005-03-14 09:43 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 13:45 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-15 10:00 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 10:47 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 14:33 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 09:32 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 14:02 Re: Questions about trampolines

Dale Johannesen

• 2005-03-14 19:55 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 18:21 RFC: always-inline vs unit-at-a-time
• 2005-03-15 18:40 Re: RFC: always-inline vs unit-at-a-time
• 2005-03-22 18:06 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
• 2005-03-22 18:26 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
• 2005-03-23 01:56 RFA: PR 19225
• 2005-03-24 21:10 Re: RFA: PR 19225
• 2005-03-24 23:13 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-31 20:23 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin
• 2005-03-31 20:33 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin

Dan Kegel

• 2005-03-07 00:34 re: GCC generating invalid assembly
• 2005-03-22 06:13 ICE in gcc-4.0-20050305 for m68k
• 2005-03-30 07:30 PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation
• 2005-03-30 17:08 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation

Daniel Berlin

• 2005-03-01 20:40 SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format
• 2005-03-01 22:02 Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format
• 2005-03-01 22:59 Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format
• 2005-03-06 17:39 SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 18:45 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 19:38 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 19:41 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 21:22 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 21:54 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-10 20:56 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-11 16:34 Re: Revamp WWW review process?
• 2005-03-12 17:36 Re: PR debug/19345
• 2005-03-13 15:31 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-13 15:53 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-13 16:04 Dear adventurers of math! (was Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)))
• 2005-03-16 04:42 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-16 04:44 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-16 13:38 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-16 21:37 SVN repo updated
• 2005-03-24 20:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-28 14:31 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-29 01:25 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers onsparc64-linux...
• 2005-03-29 15:07 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to dealwith when writing testcases.
• 2005-03-29 15:19 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to dealwith when writing testcases.
• 2005-03-29 23:26 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how todeal with when writing testcases.

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2005-03-01 01:45 Re: testsuite execution question
• 2005-03-01 21:36 Re: testsuite execution question
• 2005-03-05 04:03 Re: testsuite execution question
• 2005-03-08 04:01 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 16:12 Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911
• 2005-03-13 20:27 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-15 02:06 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-25 14:06 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-30 13:57 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation
• 2005-03-31 18:37 Re: -fno-common
• 2005-03-31 21:33 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location

Daniel Kegel

• 2005-03-01 20:52 re: cross compiling
• 2005-03-17 22:51 re: problems compiling gcc-3.3.1
• 2005-03-31 02:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation

Dave Korn

• 2005-03-01 13:20 RE: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
• 2005-03-03 15:08 RE: HELP!!!!
• 2005-03-08 17:31 RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-08 18:42 RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-08 18:42 RE: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-11 10:40 RE: Bad link on webpage
• 2005-03-15 19:20 RE: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 18:31 RE: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-31 18:33 -fno-common

Dave Murphy

• 2005-03-24 20:08 building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host
• 2005-03-27 00:08 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host

Dave Wooly

• 2005-03-23 13:48 Links exchange with http://www.mirror5.com.

David Carlton

• 2005-03-05 02:08 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions butnon-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-10 17:37 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-14 17:29 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))

David Edelsohn

• 2005-03-04 23:58 Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance
• 2005-03-07 15:48 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-16 01:40 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support
• 2005-03-25 15:43 Re: maybe a gcc bug

David Pettersson

• 2005-03-29 15:28 Name of files and functions etc.
• 2005-03-30 07:44 Re: Name of files and functions etc.

David Starner

• 2005-03-08 03:07 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 04:06 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))

Denis Chertykov

• 2005-03-18 15:53 CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-18 20:38 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-19 13:34 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-19 13:34 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-20 10:55 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-21 17:49 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-21 17:49 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-21 17:49 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits

Denis Vlasenko

• 2005-03-29 14:37 memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel
• 2005-03-29 20:23 [PATCH] fix i386 memcpy
• 2005-03-29 20:24 Re: [PATCH] fix i386 memcpy
• 2005-03-30 06:16 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel

Denis Washington

• 2005-03-07 17:33 GDC

Devang Patel

• 2005-03-04 22:43 invoke.texi: reference to web page that does not exist
• 2005-03-31 17:06 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location

Diego Novillo

• 2005-03-01 19:09 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-07 12:27 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-09 23:21 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-12 15:19 Re: Root Node of AST
• 2005-03-12 20:12 RFC: Changes in the representation of call clobbers
• 2005-03-14 04:20 Re: memory checkers and gcc support
• 2005-03-18 13:52 Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline
• 2005-03-27 04:46 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-28 02:51 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-28 13:54 Re: [gomp] Broken gomp branch
• 2005-03-28 14:15 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-30 18:22 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-31 23:08 Re: What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ?

Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos

• 2005-03-09 13:44 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#*-*-solaris2*

DJ Delorie

• 2005-03-07 18:56 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-07 19:07 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-07 20:16 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-07 20:43 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-10 03:00 Re: Creating assembler comments from RTL
• 2005-03-22 01:47 expand_binop misplacing results?
• 2005-03-22 22:16 Re: Keep dwarf.h in sync?
• 2005-03-23 03:04 Re: expand_binop misplacing results?
• 2005-03-26 04:55 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-26 05:19 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-26 05:52 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-26 06:30 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-28 02:07 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?

Dorit Naishlos

• 2005-03-13 21:14 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-16 10:33 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-21 13:53 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops
• 2005-03-21 13:56 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops

Duncan Sands

• 2005-03-07 16:10 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-07 16:31 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 08:26 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 09:43 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 11:51 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 13:31 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-09 08:19 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-09 11:47 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))

E. Weddington

• 2005-03-01 14:27 Re: Different sized data and code pointers
• 2005-03-01 23:16 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 16:24 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-04 14:40 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-07 21:36 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface
• 2005-03-14 17:31 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 22:10 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 17:32 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-26 15:10 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host

Ed Smith-Rowland

• 2005-03-02 02:23 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 04:21 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-07 02:51 Re: tag request

Edmar Wienskoski

• 2005-03-04 22:59 PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance

Eljay Love-Jensen

• 2005-03-29 16:50 Re: Gcc help

Eric Botcazou

• 2005-03-01 07:21 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
• 2005-03-03 17:36 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-03 22:33 Re: bootstrap error in 4.1 on sparc
• 2005-03-07 16:50 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a
• 2005-03-08 08:46 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a
• 2005-03-08 19:19 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a
• 2005-03-14 08:19 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 07:20 Re: [Ada] Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050315 on sparc-linux: a-except.adb: unhandled expression in get_expr_operands():
• 2005-03-22 11:20 Re: removal of -mflat in GCC 4.0 (sparc)
• 2005-03-25 07:29 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-25 07:46 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2005-03-25 11:09 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2005-03-25 17:30 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-25 19:05 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-26 12:47 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?

Eric Christopher

• 2005-03-15 00:51 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 19:51 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-22 18:56 Re: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation
• 2005-03-23 16:50 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation
• 2005-03-23 23:06 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation
• 2005-03-29 19:02 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation

Eyal Lebedinsky

• 2005-03-05 07:59 mudflap abort
• 2005-03-06 03:07 Re: mudflap abort

Fariborz Jahanian

• 2005-03-11 19:15 C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member
• 2005-03-11 19:48 Re: C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member
• 2005-03-31 18:52 bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin

feng qiu

• 2005-03-08 13:04 Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct"
• 2005-03-13 05:00 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct"

Feng Wang

• 2005-03-12 03:12 Received welcome message.

Florian Weimer

• 2005-03-04 22:33 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning.
• 2005-03-05 18:41 Re: MetaC++ announcement
• 2005-03-08 09:31 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-11 09:38 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-29 13:50 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.

Frank Ch. Eigler

• 2005-03-04 19:57 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning.
• 2005-03-18 20:38 Re: help with mudflap testsuite result analysis

Frank Heckenbach

• 2005-03-02 17:14 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-03 00:55 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-03 01:51 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-05 06:48 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-08 10:15 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-09 05:00 Re: Pascal front-end integration

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2005-03-01 01:21 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
• 2005-03-07 06:00 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-07 06:00 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-07 06:07 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-07 06:08 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-09 06:11 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-09 16:09 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-09 16:16 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-09 16:42 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-09 16:55 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-10 00:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-10 00:09 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-10 14:58 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-12 02:04 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-12 02:07 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-12 02:08 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-12 06:27 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 04:58 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 14:30 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 14:56 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-14 16:19 Re: Dear adventurers of math! (was Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)))
• 2005-03-14 16:25 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 11:37 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 11:38 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 17:57 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-16 21:49 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-17 12:14 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-25 09:23 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-25 17:53 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-25 19:09 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-25 19:43 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-25 21:07 ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-26 05:09 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-26 05:25 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-27 17:37 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2005-03-27 21:36 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin

Galli Andrea

• 2005-03-24 18:24 Help procob

Garrett D'Amore

• 2005-03-21 19:31 removal of -mflat in GCC 4.0 (sparc)

Gary Funck

• 2005-03-04 07:42 GCC 3.4.3 static constants, named sections, and -fkeep-static-consts
• 2005-03-10 07:07 RE: GCC 3.4.3 static constants, named sections, and -fkeep-static-consts
• 2005-03-14 05:03 RE: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 05:25 RE: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!

gccadmin

• 2005-03-02 23:26 gcc-3.3-20050302 is now available
• 2005-03-05 00:53 gcc-3.4-20050304 is now available
• 2005-03-05 23:26 gcc-4.0-20050305 is now available
• 2005-03-06 18:12 gcc-4.1-20050306 is now available
• 2005-03-09 23:28 gcc-3.3-20050309 is now available
• 2005-03-11 23:47 gcc-3.4-20050311 is now available
• 2005-03-12 23:25 gcc-4.0-20050312 is now available
• 2005-03-13 18:09 gcc-4.1-20050313 is now available
• 2005-03-16 23:26 gcc-3.3-20050316 is now available
• 2005-03-19 00:04 gcc-3.4-20050318 is now available
• 2005-03-19 23:41 gcc-4.0-20050319 is now available
• 2005-03-20 18:09 gcc-4.1-20050320 is now available
• 2005-03-23 23:49 gcc-3.3-20050323 is now available
• 2005-03-26 00:30 gcc-3.4-20050325 is now available
• 2005-03-26 23:25 gcc-4.0-20050326 is now available
• 2005-03-27 18:07 gcc-4.1-20050327 is now available
• 2005-03-30 23:49 gcc-3.3-20050330 is now available

Geert Bosch

• 2005-03-07 17:52 Re: Using fold() in frontends
• 2005-03-10 12:46 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-20 00:52 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION
• 2005-03-21 15:22 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure
• 2005-03-21 17:18 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure
• 2005-03-23 13:39 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION
• 2005-03-27 12:00 Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx

Geoff Keating

• 2005-03-26 07:19 new cctools for powerpc-darwin7 required for HEAD
• 2005-03-27 23:39 Re: Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx
• 2005-03-31 20:51 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location

geoffk

• 2005-03-10 21:18 Re: request for timings - makedepend

Geoffrey Keating

• 2005-03-01 18:30 Re: Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge)
• 2005-03-04 22:57 Re: invoke.texi: reference to web page that does not exist
• 2005-03-16 00:31 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support
• 2005-03-31 23:47 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location
• 2005-03-31 23:51 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2005-03-02 23:13 Re: Weeeeee! ;)))
• 2005-03-29 13:44 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-29 13:55 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers

Giovanni Bajo

• 2005-03-01 01:02 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html
• 2005-03-06 03:54 Re: invoke.texi: reference to web page that does not exist
• 2005-03-06 04:12 Re: [PING] [PATCH]: New Port(MAXQ)
• 2005-03-07 17:41 Using fold() in frontends
• 2005-03-07 19:14 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 13:05 Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-08 13:07 Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-09 11:18 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-09 16:38 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-09 17:48 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-10 08:44 Re: Bad link on webpage
• 2005-03-11 08:02 Re: Bad link on webpage
• 2005-03-11 10:21 Re: Bad link on webpage
• 2005-03-11 12:23 Revamp WWW review process?
• 2005-03-11 13:13 Re: documentation on writing testcases?
• 2005-03-11 17:20 Re: Documentation on writing testcases now in GCC Wiki
• 2005-03-14 13:24 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 01:52 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 10:08 Re: Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically?
• 2005-03-17 02:34 Re: Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700 fix.
• 2005-03-17 10:04 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why?
• 2005-03-18 10:03 Re: Known regression ? gcc-4.0.0-20050312 FPE's on C++
• 2005-03-19 01:23 Re: reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0)
• 2005-03-20 01:59 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-25 10:43 Re: maybe a gcc bug

Graham Stott

• 2005-03-26 11:53 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu?

Greg Schafer

• 2005-03-09 23:15 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-25 05:49 BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2005-03-25 10:48 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2005-03-25 11:46 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer

H. J. Lu

• 2005-03-14 16:16 Re: Questions about trampolines

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2005-03-02 01:45 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-06 18:57 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names
• 2005-03-11 00:55 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-11 01:48 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-11 04:14 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-11 16:12 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-14 17:33 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-16 15:59 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-17 01:46 Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700 fix.
• 2005-03-24 03:21 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-30 03:13 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-30 05:09 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0

Helge Bahmann

• 2005-03-02 13:54 Re: Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call

Henddher Pedroza

• 2005-03-06 21:53 successfully built gnu 3.4.3

Henrik Sorensen

• 2005-03-01 18:05 Re: Identifying rule responsible for lookahead
• 2005-03-20 21:01 PL/I Frontend for GCC version 0.0.10 released

HutchinsonAndy

• 2005-03-10 02:45 Creating assembler comments from RTL
• 2005-03-20 04:44 [AVR] RTL prologue/epilogue

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2005-03-06 17:06 PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names
• 2005-03-06 18:38 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names
• 2005-03-06 22:38 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
• 2005-03-07 21:01 RFC: New pexecute interface
• 2005-03-07 21:40 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface
• 2005-03-09 06:12 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface
• 2005-03-12 01:49 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None".
• 2005-03-12 02:54 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None".
• 2005-03-22 16:53 Re: reload question
• 2005-03-23 15:56 A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-23 16:10 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-23 22:07 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 16:17 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 16:23 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 16:45 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 17:51 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 19:16 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-25 12:43 Re: reload question
• 2005-03-25 14:27 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-25 18:58 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-25 19:07 Re: getopt.h getopt() decl broken for many targets
• 2005-03-26 03:11 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-27 03:36 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 - Questions concerning the AVR target
• 2005-03-27 16:56 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-28 17:30 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-29 18:17 Re: combine.c
• 2005-03-30 04:05 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0

Ivan Leo Puoti

• 2005-03-31 15:46 FASTCALL support

J. Hart

• 2005-03-14 02:42 memory checkers and gcc support

Jack Howarth

• 2005-03-16 16:57 using test suite outside of build directory

Jakub Jelinek

• 2005-03-29 15:13 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel

James A. Morrison

• 2005-03-01 13:18 Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-01 14:21 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-01 23:47 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 03:21 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-24 01:00 Re: gcc-4.0.0-prerelease: -O0 build time higher than -O1?

James E Wilson

• 2005-03-08 04:46 Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double'
• 2005-03-08 22:41 Re: Building GCC on Native Platform
• 2005-03-08 23:15 Re: IA64 record alignment rules, and modes?
• 2005-03-09 02:59 Re: GCC 3.4.3 static constants, named sections, and -fkeep-static-consts
• 2005-03-10 19:47 Re: Bad link on webpage
• 2005-03-10 20:21 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct"
• 2005-03-10 20:39 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity
• 2005-03-10 21:10 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-10 21:18 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL
• 2005-03-10 21:20 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL
• 2005-03-10 21:28 Re: Spill cost
• 2005-03-10 21:49 Re: gcc-3.4.4-20050211: maybe a danger behaviour
• 2005-03-10 21:55 Re: Help : Instruction Scheduling
• 2005-03-10 22:09 Re: what's the proper way to configure/enable/disable C exception handling?
• 2005-03-10 22:14 Re: Specifying a linker script from the specs file
• 2005-03-10 22:15 Re: mthumb in specs file
• 2005-03-10 22:41 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-11 00:06 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity
• 2005-03-11 01:36 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-11 01:47 Re: gnattools folder and GCC snapshots
• 2005-03-11 03:34 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-11 05:51 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-11 23:42 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-11 23:57 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None".
• 2005-03-12 01:39 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None".
• 2005-03-12 01:52 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-12 02:21 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None".
• 2005-03-13 00:18 Re: are link errors caused by mixing of versions?
• 2005-03-13 00:33 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL
• 2005-03-13 01:07 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-13 01:11 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 20:13 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct"
• 2005-03-15 21:36 Re: `make uninstall' and GCC
• 2005-03-15 22:06 Re: Root Node of AST
• 2005-03-15 22:13 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3
• 2005-03-15 22:55 Re: a problem about cross-compile for powerpc
• 2005-03-18 05:21 Re: false spam positive from gcc-patches
• 2005-03-18 05:36 Re: supporting --with-cpu=default32 option for x86_64
• 2005-03-18 05:44 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-18 05:52 Re: RTL?
• 2005-03-22 19:55 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3
• 2005-03-22 20:04 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-23 00:22 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0.
• 2005-03-24 01:35 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-24 01:52 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-24 20:35 Re: RFA: PR 19225
• 2005-03-24 20:48 Re: inefficient code output?
• 2005-03-24 22:28 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-24 23:08 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-24 23:18 Re: What does --enable-altivec do?
• 2005-03-25 00:31 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-25 01:10 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-28 23:19 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327
• 2005-03-28 23:34 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-29 00:04 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-29 01:34 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327
• 2005-03-29 01:58 Re: Texinfo appears to be FUBAR.
• 2005-03-30 02:12 Re: PR 20505
• 2005-03-30 02:52 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS
• 2005-03-30 03:12 Re: gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt
• 2005-03-30 21:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation
• 2005-03-31 19:15 Re: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-31 19:33 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux
• 2005-03-31 19:49 Re: gcc 3.4.2
• 2005-03-31 19:57 Re: PR 20505
• 2005-03-31 20:44 Re: GNU toolchain for blackfin processor

Jan Hubicka

• 2005-03-01 00:33 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 01:04 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 12:30 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 12:46 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 15:14 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 19:05 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-18 13:01 Merge to tree-profiling

Janis Johnson

• 2005-02-28 23:59 Re: testsuite execution question
• 2005-03-01 00:14 Re: testsuite execution question
• 2005-03-01 18:25 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-01 18:29 Re: testsuite execution question
• 2005-03-01 18:59 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-02 22:55 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-05 00:33 Re: testsuite execution question
• 2005-03-11 17:12 Re: documentation on writing testcases?
• 2005-03-14 18:02 Re: Non-bootstrap build status reports
• 2005-03-18 20:02 Re: Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline
• 2005-03-28 18:25 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers

jason

• 2005-03-03 23:22 instrumentation injection & trees

Jason Mancini

• 2005-03-16 23:30 bootstrap 4.0-200503005: flag_unsafe_math_optimizations undeclared
• 2005-03-16 23:59 RE: bootstrap 4.0-200503005: flag_unsafe_math_optimizations undeclared

Jason Merrill

• 2005-03-05 14:41 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-11 22:32 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warningabout returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-29 04:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)

jc-nospam

• 2005-03-16 01:44 Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!.
• 2005-03-16 02:23 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-16 03:57 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-16 05:10 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-16 05:19 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-16 05:24 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-23 19:40 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!

JCA

• 2005-03-18 22:35 Problem running optimized IA64 code that invokes hand-coded assembly language function
• 2005-03-18 22:46 Overriding optimization for individual portions of C code

Jeff Johnston

• 2005-03-17 20:22 Re: Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700fix.

Jeffrey A Law

• 2005-03-02 18:41 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-02 18:42 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-03 16:32 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-08 17:16 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-08 17:32 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-15 00:43 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-18 16:55 Weird behavior in ivopts code
• 2005-03-21 17:53 Re: Weird behavior in ivopts code
• 2005-03-30 18:10 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-30 18:39 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-30 19:54 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?

Jesus Christ

• 2005-03-02 21:36 HELP!!!!

Joe Buck

• 2005-03-05 04:49 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-07 17:57 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-07 19:24 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-07 21:09 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 00:59 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-10 01:02 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-10 17:19 Re: Bad link on webpage
• 2005-03-10 23:27 Re: GCC 3.4.x => 4.0 compatiblity
• 2005-03-11 22:22 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-12 00:02 Re: Write after approval - processed by "None".
• 2005-03-14 18:30 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 00:07 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 00:17 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 01:32 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 00:44 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 02:00 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!.
• 2005-03-16 03:15 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-16 17:47 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-17 17:25 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-18 23:00 Re: Overriding optimization for individual portions of C code
• 2005-03-24 00:03 Re: Installation Instructions
• 2005-03-25 17:47 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-25 17:52 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer
• 2005-03-25 19:16 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-26 06:22 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-28 17:59 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.
• 2005-03-28 18:24 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.
• 2005-03-29 17:27 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-29 20:21 Re: Name of files and functions etc.
• 2005-03-29 22:52 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.

Joern RENNECKE

• 2005-03-16 13:50 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 17:54 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 13:36 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 14:36 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 15:52 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-18 12:24 Re: Questions about trampolines

Johan Bergman \(KI/EAB\)

• 2005-03-01 01:49 RE: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html

John Marshall

• 2005-03-22 04:50 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions

John Vickers

• 2005-03-18 09:55 Known regression ? gcc-4.0.0-20050312 FPE's on C++

Jon Grimm

• 2005-03-22 00:22 RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE?
• 2005-03-22 15:32 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE?

Jonathan Wakely

• 2005-03-02 18:07 Re: __LDBL_MAX__ exceeds range of 'long double'
• 2005-03-03 12:59 Re: HELP!!!!
• 2005-03-04 15:19 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning.
• 2005-03-05 14:29 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning.
• 2005-03-08 13:42 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-13 14:32 Re: C++ [RFC] taking address of a static const data member
• 2005-03-16 10:43 Re: Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically?
• 2005-03-16 14:58 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 10:08 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why?
• 2005-03-17 13:26 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why?

Joseph S. Myers

• 2005-03-01 21:00 Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format
• 2005-03-01 22:21 Re: SVN repo updated, http access, and commit mail format
• 2005-03-01 23:40 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 00:22 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-02 02:18 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-02 12:55 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 13:12 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-03 01:13 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-03 03:05 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-05 03:05 Re: C99 variable length arrays for numerical code?
• 2005-03-05 12:45 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-06 18:21 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names
• 2005-03-06 18:34 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 18:53 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 21:00 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 21:20 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-06 21:25 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-06 21:38 Re: SVN Repo updated (please look)
• 2005-03-07 12:16 Re: extending archtypes: __attribute__((format(__sqlite__, 2, 6)))
• 2005-03-07 18:24 Re: Using fold() in frontends
• 2005-03-07 19:43 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-11 11:45 Re: Bad link on webpage
• 2005-03-11 12:04 Re: documentation on writing testcases?
• 2005-03-12 20:56 DR#236 update
• 2005-03-14 13:25 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 20:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 22:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-17 17:45 Re: short int and conversions
• 2005-03-22 14:45 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0.
• 2005-03-24 21:27 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-31 23:41 Re: [Fwd: Re: compiler interpretation of *mptr++ = mptr]

Julian Brown

• 2005-03-03 18:19 Re: Different sized data and code pointers

Kai Henningsen

• 2005-03-11 22:13 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-12 21:05 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-12 21:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 19:35 Re: Merging calls to `abort'

Karel Gardas

• 2005-03-02 20:04 Compilation performance comparison of GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0.0(20050301) on MICO sources
• 2005-03-04 14:52 Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-04 20:07 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning.

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2005-03-21 03:21 Extra gcc-3.3 java failures when using expect-5.43
• 2005-03-21 14:35 Re: Extra gcc-3.3 java failures when using expect-5.43
• 2005-03-31 22:46 What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ?

Kazu Hirata

• 2005-03-04 04:01 A headache with fold_ternary and CALL_EXPR.
• 2005-03-06 01:10 Things blocking fold_ARITY and fold_buildN
• 2005-03-06 01:31 Re: Things blocking fold_ARITY and fold_buildN
• 2005-03-07 07:20 A preliminary result of fold_buildN (memory usage included)
• 2005-03-08 19:11 Shall we take a short break from my fold changes?
• 2005-03-17 19:51 For those who want to automatically generate predicates.md...
• 2005-03-21 23:45 Obsoleting more ports for 4.0.
• 2005-03-22 01:26 A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl.
• 2005-03-22 14:11 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0.
• 2005-03-22 16:15 Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
• 2005-03-22 16:33 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
• 2005-03-22 17:39 Conversion from fold (buildN (...)) to fold_buildN.
• 2005-03-22 18:22 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl?
• 2005-03-26 17:02 Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-28 01:09 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-28 03:05 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-30 19:20 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?

Ken Raeburn

• 2005-03-17 02:02 Re: Merging calls to `abort'

kevin lyda

• 2005-03-07 08:23 extending archtypes: __attribute__((format(__sqlite__, 2, 6)))

Kunal Parmar

• 2005-03-08 13:56 problem with the scheduler
• 2005-03-08 14:10 problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911
• 2005-03-08 14:51 problem with dependencies in gcc-4.0-20040911
• 2005-03-08 16:08 Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911
• 2005-03-08 17:04 Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911

Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf

• 2005-03-04 01:11 Re: Question about ObjC++ state
• 2005-03-29 23:55 Successful bootstrap/install of current gcc 4.0 and 4.1 snapshots on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 using the latest odcctools

Laurent GUERBY

• 2005-03-06 13:29 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32?
• 2005-03-07 23:16 *** PROBABLY SPAM *** Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-13 10:54 FYI: ACATS/bugzilla on GCC wiki
• 2005-03-19 20:10 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION

Levent Erbuke

• 2005-03-29 09:46 gcc 3.4.2

M Ranga Swami Reddy

• 2005-03-11 10:44 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contributionto FSF

M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT

• 2005-03-11 11:02 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF
• 2005-03-11 11:11 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF
• 2005-03-16 09:37 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF
• 2005-03-22 09:40 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF
• 2005-03-28 14:39 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF (fwd)

Marc Espie

• 2005-03-14 13:12 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 13:44 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 14:14 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-29 10:11 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-29 17:41 Re: Merging calls to `abort'

Marcin Dalecki

• 2005-03-02 02:29 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 02:38 Fortran libs.
• 2005-03-02 02:46 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 04:34 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 14:46 Mudlfap disable doesn't work as expected.
• 2005-03-07 23:18 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-07 23:19 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-07 23:19 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:32 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:42 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:49 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:53 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:08 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 02:25 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 03:19 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 04:37 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-14 06:12 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-29 07:48 Re: Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler
• 2005-03-30 13:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation

Marcus

• 2005-03-10 02:32 Bad link on webpage

Marek Michalkiewicz

• 2005-03-19 16:53 AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-19 20:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-19 22:06 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-20 01:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-21 00:12 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-21 15:41 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits

Mark Mitchell

• 2005-03-01 00:30 Re: Apologies to Mark
• 2005-03-01 01:38 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
• 2005-03-01 19:25 Re: Hot and Cold Partitioning (Was: GCC 4.1 Projects)
• 2005-03-01 22:55 Re: Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call
• 2005-03-01 23:00 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-01 23:25 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-02 16:39 Re: Constant pointer to (member) function, indirect call
• 2005-03-02 16:50 Re: [patch] fold-const.c: Reorganize fold - Part 1/n
• 2005-03-04 01:30 Re: Question about ObjC++ state
• 2005-03-05 01:06 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor`warning.
• 2005-03-05 01:16 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor`warning.
• 2005-03-05 01:31 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor`warning.
• 2005-03-06 17:46 Re: [PING] [PATCH]: New Port(MAXQ)
• 2005-03-07 01:28 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names
• 2005-03-07 16:18 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-07 17:50 Re: Using fold() in frontends
• 2005-03-07 17:58 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-07 18:50 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-07 19:06 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-07 19:49 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 03:56 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 03:59 Re: Using fold() in frontends
• 2005-03-08 04:02 Re: A preliminary result of fold_buildN (memory usage included)
• 2005-03-08 04:04 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 17:06 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-09 00:18 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-09 00:52 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-09 22:52 GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-10 04:11 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-11 02:55 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-11 03:30 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-13 18:30 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-13 18:40 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-15 00:32 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 00:24 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 00:48 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 15:26 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 19:54 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 22:02 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-22 02:39 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE?
• 2005-03-22 02:47 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE?
• 2005-03-22 02:57 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE?
• 2005-03-22 04:44 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0.
• 2005-03-24 07:02 Re: PR 20505
• 2005-03-24 15:25 Re: Conversion from fold (buildN (...)) to fold_buildN.
• 2005-03-24 19:29 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-24 23:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-25 03:31 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-25 08:00 Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-25 16:30 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-25 17:34 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-29 04:38 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)

Michael Cieslinski

• 2005-03-08 11:08 are link errors caused by mixing of versions?
• 2005-03-11 16:48 Documentation on writing testcases now in GCC Wiki

Michael LeBlanc

• 2005-03-23 15:06 What does --enable-altivec do?

Michael Matz

• 2005-03-03 02:07 Re: Error help
• 2005-03-08 15:14 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-16 16:07 Re: Installation into 'const' directory
• 2005-03-18 14:04 Re: Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline

Michael N. Moran

• 2005-03-05 14:01 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtualdestructor` warning.
• 2005-03-14 21:56 Re: Questions about trampolines

Mike Hearn

• 2005-03-06 15:55 Statically linking fortify functions

Mike Stump

• 2005-03-01 19:42 Re: Question regarding c++ constructors
• 2005-03-02 02:04 Re: hacking frameworks for linux
• 2005-03-02 02:07 Re: reinventing frameworks in gnu toolchain (fwd)
• 2005-03-02 02:20 Re: about gcc -XLinker -M
• 2005-03-02 02:52 Re: Question about ObjC++ state
• 2005-03-04 02:29 Re: Question about ObjC++ state
• 2005-03-07 07:50 Re: tag request
• 2005-03-11 20:06 Re: documentation on writing testcases?
• 2005-03-12 00:12 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-12 18:08 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-12 18:52 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-14 18:15 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 17:41 Re: using test suite outside of build directory
• 2005-03-17 01:43 libgcc-std.ver question
• 2005-03-17 08:31 Re: Question about how to compile multiple files with g++
• 2005-03-17 19:37 help with mudflap testsuite result analysis
• 2005-03-17 21:47 Re: libgcc-std.ver question
• 2005-03-17 23:21 Re: coverage mismatch
• 2005-03-18 19:21 Re: help with mudflap testsuite result analysis
• 2005-03-21 22:53 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions
• 2005-03-22 00:07 Re: Licensing question about libobjc
• 2005-03-22 03:10 java on darwin8?
• 2005-03-24 19:29 Re: Help procob
• 2005-03-27 20:08 Re: Gcc embedding issue of our commerical product
• 2005-03-27 20:41 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers
• 2005-03-27 21:07 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers
• 2005-03-27 21:30 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2005-03-28 17:28 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.
• 2005-03-28 22:27 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux...
• 2005-03-29 20:14 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.
• 2005-03-30 20:47 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.
• 2005-03-30 21:57 Re: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-31 20:18 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin

Mile Davidovic

• 2005-03-22 12:22 Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation
• 2005-03-23 13:13 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation
• 2005-03-23 17:18 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation
• 2005-03-29 09:09 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation
• 2005-03-31 06:56 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation

Miles Bader

• 2005-03-16 01:33 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 05:34 reload question
• 2005-03-18 06:14 Re: reload question
• 2005-03-18 11:08 Re: reload question

Mostafa Hagog

• 2005-03-16 15:17 Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-16 16:11 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-16 17:42 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-18 10:35 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-27 17:17 gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin
• 2005-03-28 22:18 Re: Any SMS loop example?
• 2005-03-29 10:07 Re: Re: Any SMS loop example?
• 2005-03-31 08:36 RE: SMS in gcc4.0
• 2005-03-31 14:11 RE: SMS in gcc4.0

Mws

• 2005-03-04 14:57 Re: Question w.r.t. `'class Foo' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor` warning.

Nathan Sidwell

• 2005-03-06 19:43 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names
• 2005-03-08 15:59 Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-08 17:43 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-09 08:44 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-10 18:03 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-13 19:22 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-14 14:02 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-23 10:54 PR 20505
• 2005-03-29 08:13 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-29 15:09 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel
• 2005-03-30 12:25 Re: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-30 12:28 Re: PR 20505
• 2005-03-30 13:01 Re: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-30 14:28 Re: symbol_ref constants

Nathanael Nerode

• 2005-03-01 00:15 Apologies to Mark

Neil Booth

• 2005-03-12 02:04 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-12 03:00 Re: How is lang.opt processed?

Nicholas Nethercote

• 2005-03-14 05:22 Re: memory checkers and gcc support

Nick Burrett

• 2005-03-21 07:55 Ada and ARM build assertion failure
• 2005-03-21 16:03 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure

Nick Clifton

• 2005-03-18 10:34 Re: help regarding ld
• 2005-03-22 08:16 Re: gcc with arm -vfp instructions
• 2005-03-23 09:20 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0.

Nitin Gupta

• 2005-03-16 23:41 supporting --with-cpu=default32 option for x86_64

Nix

• 2005-03-22 16:14 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!.

Olivier Galibert

• 2005-03-09 11:11 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++

Paolo Bonzini

• 2005-03-07 08:27 Re: request for timings - makedepend

Paolo Carlini

• 2005-03-01 15:46 Re: 3.3.2 <--> 3.4.2 compatibility?
• 2005-03-07 14:20 __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-07 14:55 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-07 15:41 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-07 15:42 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-07 19:00 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 00:20 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 11:39 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 11:57 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-10 14:30 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-10 17:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 13:13 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-16 00:17 Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support
• 2005-03-16 00:35 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support
• 2005-03-16 01:01 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support
• 2005-03-16 09:34 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support
• 2005-03-24 15:25 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')"
• 2005-03-24 15:56 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')"

Paul Brook

• 2005-03-01 13:39 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x
• 2005-03-01 15:41 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x
• 2005-03-02 16:32 Re: Fortran libs.
• 2005-03-08 17:25 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-13 20:30 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-19 13:14 Re: gcc 3.4.3 bug C++/inlines/thumb
• 2005-03-20 02:32 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits

Paul Koning

• 2005-03-29 16:47 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0

Paul Schlie

• 2005-03-02 00:20 Re: Different sized data and code pointers
• 2005-03-02 01:13 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-02 03:46 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-02 15:10 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-02 16:58 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-03 16:23 Re: Different sized data and code pointers
• 2005-03-04 03:31 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-04 05:03 Re: Target specific memory attributes from RTL
• 2005-03-04 17:14 Re: Extension compatibility policy
• 2005-03-08 18:27 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-12 06:04 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-12 19:06 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 06:01 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 18:47 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-18 02:23 Re: short int and conversions
• 2005-03-18 16:56 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-18 20:19 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-18 23:38 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-19 17:08 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-19 17:51 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-19 18:51 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-19 19:01 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-19 20:10 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-19 21:38 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-19 23:14 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-19 23:16 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-19 23:38 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-20 02:40 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-20 02:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-20 17:06 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-20 17:41 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-21 11:43 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-21 17:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-21 18:20 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-25 13:30 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-25 18:34 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-25 22:55 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-27 06:32 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-27 17:21 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-28 05:38 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-29 05:25 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-29 17:54 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-30 17:36 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0

Per Bothner

• 2005-03-11 08:34 documentation on writing testcases?
• 2005-03-11 18:02 Re: documentation on writing testcases?
• 2005-03-19 19:52 converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION
• 2005-03-23 03:10 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION
• 2005-03-27 19:58 dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers
• 2005-03-31 06:36 PCH versus --enable-mapped-location
• 2005-03-31 21:26 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location
• 2005-03-31 22:05 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location

Perrin Meyer

• 2005-03-05 02:29 C99 variable length arrays for numerical code?

Peter Barada

• 2005-03-02 00:55 matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-02 04:50 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-04 22:53 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-24 02:01 [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS
• 2005-03-30 06:44 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS

Peter Soetens

• 2005-03-22 19:56 GCC 4.0 pragma interface/implementation regression with templates

Petko Manolov

• 2005-03-01 15:30 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x

Pinar Kondu

• 2005-03-14 00:23 Successful build of gcc-3.4.3 Red Hat 8.0, Kernel 2.6.11.2

Prof A Olowofoyeku (The African Chief)

• 2005-03-01 13:47 Re: Pascal front-end integration

Rajesh Babu

• 2005-03-12 13:16 Root Node of AST
• 2005-03-12 13:28 PRE in GCC-3.3.3
• 2005-03-12 18:02 Re: Root Node of AST
• 2005-03-20 15:35 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3

Rajkishore Barik

• 2005-03-02 19:24 Spill cost
• 2005-03-03 00:19 Error help
• 2005-03-17 23:16 coverage mismatch
• 2005-03-29 18:10 combine.c

Ramana Radhakrishnan

• 2005-03-22 13:29 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0.

Ranjit Mathew

• 2005-03-01 06:52 gnattools folder and GCC snapshots
• 2005-03-07 07:21 Java Classes and Non-virtual Destructors
• 2005-03-08 06:20 Re: Using fold() in frontends

Razya Ladelsky

• 2005-03-10 11:49 advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-13 08:54 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling

Rene Rebe

• 2005-03-23 23:59 gcc-4.0.0-prerelease: -O0 build time higher than -O1?

Richard Earnshaw

• 2005-03-01 10:31 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
• 2005-03-01 10:42 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x
• 2005-03-01 11:02 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x
• 2005-03-01 15:44 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x
• 2005-03-14 10:40 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 10:21 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-22 09:52 Re: gcc and vfp instructions

Richard Guenther

• 2005-03-01 10:02 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 12:36 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 13:11 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 13:29 Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge)
• 2005-03-01 13:41 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 15:49 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 18:00 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-05 22:26 cgraph_remove_node still slow
• 2005-03-07 16:01 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-11 09:07 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-11 09:33 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-21 12:32 GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations?
• 2005-03-21 12:45 Useless vectorization of small loops
• 2005-03-21 12:55 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops
• 2005-03-21 13:29 Specifying alignment of pointer targets
• 2005-03-21 13:53 Re: Specifying alignment of pointer targets
• 2005-03-21 14:00 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops
• 2005-03-21 14:24 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations?
• 2005-03-21 14:28 [autovect] Bootstrap failure on i686
• 2005-03-26 18:04 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-29 15:06 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel

Richard Henderson

• 2005-03-04 19:14 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-08 02:50 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 11:49 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 18:25 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-11 15:12 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-13 18:22 Re: Feature request: Globalize symbol
• 2005-03-17 12:27 Re: libgcc-std.ver question
• 2005-03-20 15:46 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
• 2005-03-20 16:00 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-20 19:26 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-20 19:36 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-21 00:29 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits
• 2005-03-22 21:05 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion
• 2005-03-22 21:29 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops
• 2005-03-22 21:30 Re: Specifying alignment of pointer targets
• 2005-03-24 17:39 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 21:16 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)
• 2005-03-24 21:39 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24)

Richard Kenner

• 2005-03-02 18:52 Re: No way to scan-tree-dump .i01.cgraph?
• 2005-03-07 17:54 Re: Using fold() in frontends
• 2005-03-07 18:51 Re: Using fold() in frontends
• 2005-03-14 18:34 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 18:52 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 02:21 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!.
• 2005-03-16 15:21 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-16 17:24 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-19 00:16 Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
• 2005-03-20 13:20 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
• 2005-03-20 19:27 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
• 2005-03-20 20:14 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
• 2005-03-23 16:07 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 00:14 Interesting issue in gimplify_init_constructor
• 2005-03-29 15:10 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases.

Richard Stallman

• 2005-03-11 20:28 Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-14 03:00 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-14 23:44 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-14 23:44 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-14 23:44 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-15 18:39 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 16:22 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 16:25 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 16:25 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-17 05:17 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-17 23:01 Re: Merging calls to `abort'

Robert Dewar

• 2005-03-03 01:15 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32?
• 2005-03-04 09:32 Re: I have a question for gcc
• 2005-03-06 14:19 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32?
• 2005-03-06 14:20 Re: [Ada] Standard.Interger'Size = 32?
• 2005-03-07 11:06 Re: PowerPC 64 x 32 bits performance
• 2005-03-07 15:15 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-07 15:51 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:12 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:15 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:21 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:01 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:03 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 08:37 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 09:42 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 10:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 13:02 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 13:08 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 13:54 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-09 13:44 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-09 19:52 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++
• 2005-03-13 23:54 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 10:26 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 13:20 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 13:33 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 13:34 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 14:32 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 16:25 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 18:08 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 20:44 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-15 05:28 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-15 05:31 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-16 19:49 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 14:40 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-17 23:16 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-18 12:27 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-22 02:45 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE?
• 2005-03-22 02:49 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE?
• 2005-03-24 12:28 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-28 20:57 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases.
• 2005-03-29 22:21 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases.
• 2005-03-29 22:24 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases.
• 2005-03-29 22:56 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases.

Roberto Bagnara

• 2005-03-24 15:20 GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating array withsize zero (`0')"
• 2005-03-24 16:08 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')"

Rogelio M . Serrano Jr .

• 2005-03-02 02:09 Re: hacking frameworks for linux
• 2005-03-02 02:17 Re: reinventing frameworks in gnu toolchain (fwd)
• 2005-03-02 03:09 Re: Question about ObjC++ state

Roger Sayle

• 2005-03-02 16:14 Re: [patch] fold-const.c: Reorganize fold - Part 1/n
• 2005-03-04 04:21 Re: A headache with fold_ternary and CALL_EXPR.
• 2005-03-07 15:55 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-07 17:00 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-07 18:32 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-08 03:30 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning aboutreturning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-22 04:33 Re: expand_binop misplacing results?

Roland Lengfeldner

• 2005-03-07 16:33 Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a
• 2005-03-08 08:18 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a
• 2005-03-08 15:15 Re: Solaris gcc 4.0.0 static linking of libgcc.a

Ronny Peine

• 2005-03-08 00:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:47 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 00:58 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:01 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:16 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:46 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 01:55 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 10:03 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 11:50 Re: [OT] __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 13:02 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-08 13:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-16 17:34 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-17 08:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))

Rupert Wood

• 2005-03-30 17:08 RE: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-31 16:13 RE: FASTCALL support

Russell Shaw

• 2005-03-15 01:18 Re: Questions about trampolines

Sam Lauber

• 2005-03-06 16:45 Bug in libiberty configure
• 2005-03-06 17:40 Re: PATCH RFA: Use years for ChangeLog names
• 2005-03-06 20:43 GCC generating invalid assembly
• 2005-03-08 04:38 re: GCC generating invalid assembly
• 2005-03-14 16:05 `make uninstall' and GCC

Sanjiv Kumar Gupta

• 2005-03-30 11:57 symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-30 12:43 Re: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-30 14:23 Re: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-30 15:09 Re: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-31 06:16 RE: symbol_ref constants
• 2005-03-31 06:24 RE: symbol_ref constants

Sebastian Pop

• 2005-03-07 13:19 Re: request for timings - makedepend

Shawn Begin

• 2005-03-09 17:39 Gcc successful build

Simon Richter

• 2005-03-27 03:32 Re: uclibc patches

Stan Shebs

• 2005-03-31 19:13 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin

Stefan Strasser

• 2005-03-05 18:21 MetaC++ announcement
• 2005-03-05 19:08 Re: MetaC++ announcement
• 2005-03-17 20:53 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-22 11:57 inefficient code output?
• 2005-03-29 15:01 Re: i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end

Steve Ellcey

• 2005-03-09 23:39 PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 00:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 00:42 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 19:44 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-16 21:58 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug
• 2005-03-17 17:54 GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?

Steve Kargl

• 2005-03-01 00:22 Re: testsuite execution question
• 2005-03-06 02:45 How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-11 06:23 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-12 02:40 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-12 18:43 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-12 19:07 Re: Received welcome message.
• 2005-03-18 05:33 Re: false spam positive from gcc-patches
• 2005-03-25 18:29 Texinfo appears to be FUBAR.
• 2005-03-29 02:24 Re: Texinfo appears to be FUBAR.

Steve Rawley

• 2005-03-04 00:15 successful 3.4.3 bootstrap on powerpc-ibm-aix5.1.0.0

Steve Snyder

• 2005-03-01 15:35 3.3.2 <--> 3.4.2 compatibility?

Steven Bosscher

• 2005-03-01 00:01 Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
• 2005-03-01 00:38 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 01:30 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 12:41 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-01 13:28 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-01 13:30 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-01 13:31 Re: Question about GTY machinery (cgraph_edge)
• 2005-03-01 18:44 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
• 2005-03-02 09:42 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-07 19:03 Re: [Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
• 2005-03-09 23:08 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-10 11:05 Strange missing tree constant propagation
• 2005-03-13 01:16 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-13 15:42 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-13 16:00 Re: advice needed regarding c++ name mangling
• 2005-03-14 10:01 Re: Merging calls to `abort'
• 2005-03-16 16:19 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177
• 2005-03-22 09:06 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl.
• 2005-03-23 21:20 ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch
• 2005-03-24 23:53 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-25 10:23 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-26 01:18 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-26 11:16 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-26 15:24 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug?
• 2005-03-27 01:52 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-27 10:13 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-28 14:09 Re: Merging CCP and VRP?
• 2005-03-31 13:55 RE: SMS in gcc4.0
• 2005-03-31 13:56 RE: SMS in gcc4.0

Sundell Software

• 2005-03-09 22:19 Re: Deprecating min/max extension in C++

Taso N. Devetzis

• 2005-03-30 05:15 successful GCC build

Ted Teah via RT

• 2005-03-14 14:36 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF
• 2005-03-16 15:54 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF

The Doctor

• 2005-03-07 13:52 GCC 3.2.2 works for BSD/OS 4.3.1

Thomas Gill

• 2005-03-01 11:26 Different sized data and code pointers
• 2005-03-02 15:59 Re: Different sized data and code pointers
• 2005-03-03 11:55 Re: Different sized data and code pointers
• 2005-03-04 10:53 Re: Different sized data and code pointers

Thomas Koenig

• 2005-03-17 20:47 false spam positive from gcc-patches

Thorsten Glaser

• 2005-03-02 19:00 Re: matching constraints in asm operands question
• 2005-03-10 21:01 Re: GCC Status Report (2005-03-09)
• 2005-03-19 12:13 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct"

Timothy J . Wood

• 2005-03-25 16:57 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing
• 2005-03-25 18:44 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing

tm_gccmail

• 2005-03-25 12:30 Re: reload question
• 2005-03-29 02:26 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-29 08:06 Re: Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler

Tom Tromey

• 2005-03-04 03:35 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-07 15:37 Re: Java Classes and Non-virtual Destructors
• 2005-03-07 23:16 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 17:55 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-29 19:15 Re: Name of files and functions etc.
• 2005-03-29 19:20 Re: Name of files and functions etc.

Toon Moene

• 2005-03-11 19:22 Re: How is lang.opt processed?
• 2005-03-11 19:42 Write after approval - processed by "None".
• 2005-03-20 15:12 Re: reload-branch created
• 2005-03-28 08:56 Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with whenwriting testcases.
• 2005-03-30 19:27 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases.

Topi Maenpaa

• 2005-03-16 08:45 Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically?
• 2005-03-17 08:34 Compiler chokes on a simple template - why?

Ulrich Weigand

• 2005-03-19 00:44 Re: reload-branch created
• 2005-03-20 19:50 Re: reload-branch created
• 2005-03-30 16:07 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS

Uros Bizjak

• 2005-03-21 14:14 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations?
• 2005-03-21 15:27 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations?

Vinayak Ghate

• 2005-03-30 12:20 GNU toolchain for blackfin processor

Vincent Lefevre

• 2005-03-09 11:13 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-09 12:39 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-09 21:05 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-10 14:23 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-10 16:48 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-10 17:03 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 13:01 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-13 13:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))
• 2005-03-19 12:22 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0))

vivek sukumaran

• 2005-03-01 06:54 cross compiling

Vladimir Ivanov

• 2005-03-01 10:55 Re: [arm] possible bug in G++ 3.4.x

Vladimir Makarov

• 2005-03-02 15:04 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame address during codegeneration
• 2005-03-02 17:47 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame address duringcodegeneration
• 2005-03-02 19:45 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frame addressduringcodegeneration
• 2005-03-02 21:22 Re: Difference between stack pointer and frameaddressduringcodegeneration
• 2005-03-08 15:14 Re: problem with the scheduler in gcc-4.0-20040911
• 2005-03-08 15:21 Re: problem with dependencies in gcc-4.0-20040911

Waldek Hebisch

• 2005-03-02 03:23 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-03 00:37 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-05 01:03 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-05 01:06 Re: Pascal front-end integration
• 2005-03-14 19:52 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-14 22:28 Re: Questions about trampolines

Wei Qin

• 2005-03-29 03:59 Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler

Yen

• 2005-03-17 07:05 Question about how to compile multiple files with g++

Zack Weinberg

• 2005-03-04 04:16 Re: A headache with fold_ternary and CALL_EXPR.
• 2005-03-04 04:38 Re: I have a question for gcc front-end
• 2005-03-07 08:07 request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-07 20:02 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-07 20:32 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-07 20:51 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-07 20:52 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 05:51 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 05:54 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 06:35 Re: request for timings - makedepend
• 2005-03-08 18:25 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-09 00:46 Re: Bug 20375 - ia64 varadic regression
• 2005-03-09 05:39 Re: RFC: Plan for cleaning up the "Addressing Modes" macros
• 2005-03-09 05:42 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface
• 2005-03-09 06:30 Re: RFC: New pexecute interface
• 2005-03-11 19:02 Re: documentation on writing testcases?
• 2005-03-13 21:00 Re: Questions about trampolines
• 2005-03-15 18:33 Re: RFC: always-inline vs unit-at-a-time
• 2005-03-15 18:58 Re: RFC: always-inline vs unit-at-a-time
• 2005-03-16 04:45 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!
• 2005-03-21 19:00 Runtime-library versioning patch checked in
• 2005-03-22 06:33 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions
• 2005-03-22 06:48 fyi: gcc_update merged to release branches
• 2005-03-24 18:50 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-24 21:05 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0
• 2005-03-26 05:38 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-26 06:10 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-26 08:39 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty?
• 2005-03-28 18:04 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases.
• 2005-03-29 19:19 Re: Name of files and functions etc.
• 2005-03-31 00:23 Re: SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt

Zagorodnev, Grigory

• 2005-03-31 15:36 GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2005-03-01 10:10 Re: GIV optimizations
• 2005-03-10 11:23 Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation
• 2005-03-10 21:22 Re: Strange missing tree constant propagation
• 2005-03-18 17:25 Re: Weird behavior in ivopts code
• 2005-03-19 20:59 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
• 2005-03-20 15:41 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
• 2005-03-20 19:41 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index
• 2005-03-27 18:05 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64
• 2005-03-27 18:11 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64

zouq

• 2005-03-25 09:37 maybe a gcc bug
• 2005-03-28 07:58 about gcc-4.1-20050327
• 2005-03-29 00:49 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327
• 2005-03-31 03:16 about new_regalloc

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)