gcc archive
date index for March, 2005

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 31, 2005
23:51 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Geoffrey Keating
23:47 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Geoffrey Keating
23:41 Re: [Fwd: Re: compiler interpretation of *mptr++ = mptr] Joseph S. Myers
23:36 [Fwd: Re: compiler interpretation of *mptr++ = mptr] Ajoy K Thamattoor
23:08 Re: What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ? Diego Novillo
23:01 Re: What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ? Andrew Pinski
22:46 What is ccp_fold_builtin() for vs. fold_builtin_1() ? Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:05 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
21:33 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Daniel Jacobowitz
21:26 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
20:51 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Geoff Keating
20:44 Re: GNU toolchain for blackfin processor James E Wilson
20:33 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Dale Johannesen
20:23 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Dale Johannesen
20:18 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Mike Stump
19:57 Re: PR 20505 James E Wilson
19:49 Re: gcc 3.4.2 James E Wilson
19:33 Re: GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux James E Wilson
19:15 Re: symbol_ref constants James E Wilson
19:13 Re: bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Stan Shebs
18:52 bootstrap fails for apple-ppc-darwin Fariborz Jahanian
18:37 Re: -fno-common Daniel Jacobowitz
18:33 -fno-common Dave Korn
17:06 Re: PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Devang Patel
16:13 RE: FASTCALL support Rupert Wood
15:46 FASTCALL support Ivan Leo Puoti
15:36 GCC 4.1 bootstrap failed at ia64-*-linux Zagorodnev, Grigory
14:11 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Mostafa Hagog
13:56 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Steven Bosscher
13:55 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Steven Bosscher
13:42 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Canqun Yang
08:36 RE: SMS in gcc4.0 Mostafa Hagog
08:04 Getting access to g++ tree from front end. Brendon Costa
06:56 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
06:36 PCH versus --enable-mapped-location Per Bothner
06:24 RE: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
06:16 RE: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
04:58 Re: about new_regalloc Andrew Pinski
03:16 about new_regalloc zouq
02:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Daniel Kegel
00:23 Re: SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt Zack Weinberg
00:16 SUBTARGET_OPTIONS / SUBTARGET_SWITCHES with .opt Aldy Hernandez

March 30, 2005
23:49 gcc-3.3-20050330 is now available gccadmin
21:57 Re: symbol_ref constants Mike Stump
21:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation James E Wilson
20:47 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Mike Stump
19:54 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Jeffrey A Law
19:27 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Toon Moene
19:20 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Kazu Hirata
18:39 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Jeffrey A Law
18:22 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Diego Novillo
18:10 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Jeffrey A Law
17:36 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
17:08 RE: symbol_ref constants Rupert Wood
17:08 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Dan Kegel
16:07 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS Ulrich Weigand
15:09 Re: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
14:28 Re: symbol_ref constants Nathan Sidwell
14:23 Re: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
13:57 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Daniel Jacobowitz
13:24 Re: PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Marcin Dalecki
13:01 Re: symbol_ref constants Nathan Sidwell
12:53 Re: gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt (solved) Clemens Koller
12:43 Re: symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
12:28 Re: PR 20505 Nathan Sidwell
12:25 Re: symbol_ref constants Nathan Sidwell
12:20 GNU toolchain for blackfin processor Vinayak Ghate
11:57 symbol_ref constants Sanjiv Kumar Gupta
07:44 Re: Name of files and functions etc. David Pettersson
07:30 PCH and moving gcc binaries after installation Dan Kegel
06:44 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS Peter Barada
06:16 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Denis Vlasenko
05:15 successful GCC build Taso N. Devetzis
05:09 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
04:05 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
03:13 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Hans-Peter Nilsson
03:12 Re: gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt James E Wilson
02:52 Re: [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS James E Wilson
02:12 Re: PR 20505 James E Wilson

March 29, 2005
23:55 Successful bootstrap/install of current gcc 4.0 and 4.1 snapshots on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 using the latest odcctools Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
23:26 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how todeal with when writing testcases. Daniel Berlin
22:56 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Robert Dewar
22:52 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Joe Buck
22:24 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Robert Dewar
20:24 Re: [PATCH] fix i386 memcpy Denis Vlasenko
20:23 [PATCH] fix i386 memcpy Denis Vlasenko
20:21 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Joe Buck
20:14 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Mike Stump
19:24 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Andrew Haley
19:20 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Tom Tromey
19:19 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Zack Weinberg
19:15 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Tom Tromey
19:02 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Eric Christopher
18:17 Re: combine.c Ian Lance Taylor
18:10 combine.c Rajkishore Barik
17:54 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
17:41 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Marc Espie
17:27 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Joe Buck
16:50 Re: Gcc help Eljay Love-Jensen
16:47 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Koning
16:43 Gcc help andre
15:48 Re: Name of files and functions etc. Andrew Pinski
15:42 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Andrew Pinski
15:28 Name of files and functions etc. David Pettersson
15:19 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to dealwith when writing testcases. Daniel Berlin
15:13 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Jakub Jelinek
15:10 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Richard Kenner
15:09 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Nathan Sidwell
15:07 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to dealwith when writing testcases. Daniel Berlin
15:06 Re: memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Richard Guenther
15:01 Re: i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end Stefan Strasser
14:37 memcpy(a,b,CONST) is not inlined by gcc 3.4.1 in Linux kernel Denis Vlasenko
13:55 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Gerald Pfeifer
13:50 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Florian Weimer
13:44 Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns Gerald Pfeifer
11:47 i want to connect gcc's front-end to my'back-end "하태준"
10:11 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Marc Espie
10:07 Re: Re: Any SMS loop example? Mostafa Hagog
09:46 gcc 3.4.2 Levent Erbuke
09:09 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
08:13 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Nathan Sidwell
08:06 Re: Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler tm_gccmail
07:48 Re: Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler Marcin Dalecki
07:44 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux... Christian Joensson
05:25 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
04:38 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
04:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Jason Merrill
03:59 Dumping Low Level Intermediate Representation for Another Compiler Wei Qin
03:30 Re: Re: Any SMS loop example? zhongknocken
02:26 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 tm_gccmail
02:24 Re: Texinfo appears to be FUBAR. Steve Kargl
01:58 Re: Texinfo appears to be FUBAR. James E Wilson
01:34 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 James E Wilson
01:25 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers onsparc64-linux... Daniel Berlin
00:49 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 zouq
00:04 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 James E Wilson

March 28, 2005
23:34 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 James E Wilson
23:19 Re: about gcc-4.1-20050327 James E Wilson
22:27 Re: assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux... Mike Stump
22:18 Re: Any SMS loop example? Mostafa Hagog
20:57 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Robert Dewar
20:13 assembly comparison gcc C pch testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux... Christian Joensson
19:27 Re: [gomp] Broken gomp branch Biagio Lucini
18:25 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Janis Johnson
18:24 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Joe Buck
18:04 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal withwhen writing testcases. Zack Weinberg
17:59 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Joe Buck
17:52 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Andrew Pinski
17:30 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
17:28 Re: Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with when writing testcases. Mike Stump
14:39 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF (fwd) M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT
14:31 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Daniel Berlin
14:15 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Diego Novillo
14:09 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Steven Bosscher
13:54 Re: [gomp] Broken gomp branch Diego Novillo
12:37 Any SMS loop example? zhongknocken
08:56 Copyright status of example code in Bugzilla - how to deal with whenwriting testcases. Toon Moene
07:58 about gcc-4.1-20050327 zouq
05:38 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
03:05 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Kazu Hirata
02:51 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Diego Novillo
02:07 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
01:09 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Kazu Hirata
00:30 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
00:23 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang

March 27, 2005
23:39 Re: Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx Geoff Keating
21:36 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Gabriel Dos Reis
21:30 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Mike Stump
21:07 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Mike Stump
20:41 Re: dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Mike Stump
20:08 Re: Gcc embedding issue of our commerical product Mike Stump
19:58 dejagnu help needed - tests get confused by column numbers Per Bothner
18:11 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Zdenek Dvorak
18:07 gcc-4.1-20050327 is now available gccadmin
18:05 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Zdenek Dvorak
17:37 Re: gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Gabriel Dos Reis
17:21 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
17:17 gcc build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin Mostafa Hagog
17:08 Gcc embedding issue of our commerical product anderson shin
16:56 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
12:07 Re: Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx Andreas Tobler
12:00 Bootstrap error on powerpc-apple-darwin: stfiwx Geert Bosch
10:13 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
06:32 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
04:46 Re: Merging CCP and VRP? Diego Novillo
03:36 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 - Questions concerning the AVR target Ian Lance Taylor
03:32 Re: uclibc patches Simon Richter
02:29 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
01:52 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
01:37 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
00:08 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host Dave Murphy

March 26, 2005
23:25 gcc-4.0-20050326 is now available gccadmin
18:04 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Richard Guenther
17:02 Merging CCP and VRP? Kazu Hirata
15:24 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Steven Bosscher
15:10 Re: building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host E. Weddington
15:00 Re: Heads up: 4.0 libjava failures on powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0 Bradley Lucier
12:47 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Eric Botcazou
11:53 Re: bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Graham Stott
11:16 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Steven Bosscher
10:45 bootstrap compare failure in ada/targparm.o on i686-pc-linux-gnu? Alexandre Oliva
08:39 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Zack Weinberg
07:19 new cctools for powerpc-darwin7 required for HEAD Geoff Keating
06:30 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
06:22 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Joe Buck
06:10 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Zack Weinberg
05:52 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
05:38 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Zack Weinberg
05:25 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Gabriel Dos Reis
05:19 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
05:09 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:55 Re: ISO C prototype style for libiberty? DJ Delorie
03:11 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
01:18 Re: [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
01:06 [rtl-optimization] Improve Data Prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
00:30 gcc-3.4-20050325 is now available gccadmin

March 25, 2005
22:55 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
21:07 ISO C prototype style for libiberty? Gabriel Dos Reis
19:43 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Gabriel Dos Reis
19:16 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Joe Buck
19:09 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Gabriel Dos Reis
19:07 Re: getopt.h getopt() decl broken for many targets Ian Lance Taylor
19:05 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Eric Botcazou
18:58 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
18:44 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Timothy J . Wood
18:34 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
18:29 Texinfo appears to be FUBAR. Steve Kargl
17:53 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Gabriel Dos Reis
17:52 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Joe Buck
17:47 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Joe Buck
17:34 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
17:30 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Eric Botcazou
16:57 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Timothy J . Wood
16:30 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
15:43 Re: maybe a gcc bug David Edelsohn
14:27 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
14:06 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Daniel Jacobowitz
13:30 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Paul Schlie
12:55 Re: reload question Alan Lehotsky
12:43 Re: reload question Ian Lance Taylor
12:30 Re: reload question tm_gccmail
11:46 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Greg Schafer
11:09 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Eric Botcazou
10:48 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Greg Schafer
10:43 Re: maybe a gcc bug Giovanni Bajo
10:23 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Steven Bosscher
09:37 maybe a gcc bug zouq
09:23 Re: Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Gabriel Dos Reis
08:00 Profile-directed feedback and remote testing Mark Mitchell
07:46 Re: BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Eric Botcazou
07:29 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Eric Botcazou
05:49 BOOT_CFLAGS and -fomit-frame-pointer Greg Schafer
03:31 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
03:28 getopt.h getopt() decl broken for many targets Aaron W. LaFramboise
01:20 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Andrew Pinski
01:10 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? James E Wilson
00:40 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Andrew Pinski
00:31 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? James E Wilson

March 24, 2005
23:53 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Steven Bosscher
23:26 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
23:18 Re: What does --enable-altivec do? James E Wilson
23:13 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Dale Johannesen
23:08 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) James E Wilson
22:28 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? James E Wilson
21:39 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Richard Henderson
21:27 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Joseph S. Myers
21:16 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Richard Henderson
21:10 Re: RFA: PR 19225 Dale Johannesen
21:05 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Zack Weinberg
20:48 Re: inefficient code output? James E Wilson
20:35 Re: RFA: PR 19225 James E Wilson
20:35 Re: GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Daniel Berlin
20:08 building GCC 4.0 for arm-elf target on mingw host Dave Murphy
19:29 Re: Help procob Mike Stump
19:29 GCC 4.0 Status Report (2005-03-24) Mark Mitchell
19:16 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
18:50 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Zack Weinberg
18:24 Help procob Galli Andrea
17:51 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
17:39 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Richard Henderson
16:45 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:23 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:17 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:08 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')" Roberto Bagnara
15:56 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')" Paolo Carlini
15:25 Re: GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating arraywith size zero (`0')" Paolo Carlini
15:25 Re: Conversion from fold (buildN (...)) to fold_buildN. Mark Mitchell
15:20 GCC version 3.4.2 and 4 inconsistency on "error: creating array withsize zero (`0')" Roberto Bagnara
12:28 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
10:58 gcc-3.3.3 ppc e500 - Abort of uic from Qt Clemens Koller
08:11 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Alexandre Oliva
07:02 Re: PR 20505 Mark Mitchell
03:21 Re: Questions about trampolines Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:01 [m68k]: Trouble trying to figure out LEGITIMIZE_RELOAD_ADDRESS Peter Barada
01:52 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 James E Wilson
01:35 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 James E Wilson
01:00 Re: gcc-4.0.0-prerelease: -O0 build time higher than -O1? James A. Morrison
00:14 Interesting issue in gimplify_init_constructor Richard Kenner
00:03 Re: Installation Instructions Joe Buck

March 23, 2005
23:59 gcc-4.0.0-prerelease: -O0 build time higher than -O1? Rene Rebe
23:49 gcc-3.3-20050323 is now available gccadmin
23:36 Installation Instructions Alf . Lacis
23:06 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Eric Christopher
22:07 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
21:20 ia64 bootstrap failure with the reload-branch Steven Bosscher
19:40 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
18:35 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Alexandre Oliva
17:18 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
16:50 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Eric Christopher
16:35 [gomp] Broken gomp branch Biagio Lucini
16:10 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
16:07 Re: A plan for eliminating cc0 Richard Kenner
15:56 A plan for eliminating cc0 Ian Lance Taylor
15:06 What does --enable-altivec do? Michael LeBlanc
13:48 Links exchange with http://www.mirror5.com. Dave Wooly
13:39 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Geert Bosch
13:13 RE: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
10:54 PR 20505 Nathan Sidwell
09:20 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Nick Clifton
03:10 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Per Bothner
03:04 Re: expand_binop misplacing results? DJ Delorie
01:56 RFA: PR 19225 Dale Johannesen
00:22 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. James E Wilson

March 22, 2005
22:16 Re: Keep dwarf.h in sync? DJ Delorie
22:07 Keep dwarf.h in sync? Ben Elliston
21:30 Re: Specifying alignment of pointer targets Richard Henderson
21:29 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Richard Henderson
21:05 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Richard Henderson
20:04 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion James E Wilson
19:59 Re: GCC 4.0 pragma interface/implementation regression with templates Andrew Pinski
19:56 GCC 4.0 pragma interface/implementation regression with templates Peter Soetens
19:55 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3 James E Wilson
18:56 Re: Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Eric Christopher
18:26 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Dale Johannesen
18:22 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Kazu Hirata
18:06 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Dale Johannesen
17:39 Conversion from fold (buildN (...)) to fold_buildN. Kazu Hirata
16:53 Re: reload question Ian Lance Taylor
16:38 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Andrew Haley
16:33 Re: Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Kazu Hirata
16:15 Do we still need get_callee_fndecl? Kazu Hirata
16:14 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!. Nix
15:32 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Jon Grimm
14:45 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Joseph S. Myers
14:11 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Kazu Hirata
13:29 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Ramana Radhakrishnan
12:22 Question regarding MIPS_GPREL_16 relocation Mile Davidovic
11:57 inefficient code output? Stefan Strasser
11:20 Re: removal of -mflat in GCC 4.0 (sparc) Eric Botcazou
09:52 Re: gcc and vfp instructions Richard Earnshaw
09:40 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT
09:19 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl. Andrew Haley
09:06 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl. Steven Bosscher
08:52 gcc and vfp instructions aram bharathi
08:52 gcc and vfp instructions aram bharathi
08:17 Re: A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl. Andrew Haley
08:16 Re: gcc with arm -vfp instructions Nick Clifton
07:26 gcc with arm -vfp instructions aram bharathi
06:48 fyi: gcc_update merged to release branches Zack Weinberg
06:33 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions Zack Weinberg
06:13 ICE in gcc-4.0-20050305 for m68k Dan Kegel
04:50 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions John Marshall
04:44 Re: Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Mark Mitchell
04:33 Re: expand_binop misplacing results? Roger Sayle
03:18 Re: java on darwin8? Andrew Pinski
03:10 java on darwin8? Mike Stump
02:57 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Mark Mitchell
02:49 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Robert Dewar
02:47 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Mark Mitchell
02:45 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Robert Dewar
02:39 Re: RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Mark Mitchell
01:47 expand_binop misplacing results? DJ Delorie
01:26 A question about java/lang.c:java_get_callee_fndecl. Kazu Hirata
00:22 RFA; DFP and REAL_TYPE? Jon Grimm
00:07 Re: Licensing question about libobjc Mike Stump

March 21, 2005
23:45 Obsoleting more ports for 4.0. Kazu Hirata
23:08 Licensing question about libobjc Andrew Pinski
22:53 Re: Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions Mike Stump
19:31 removal of -mflat in GCC 4.0 (sparc) Garrett D'Amore
19:00 Runtime-library versioning patch checked in Zack Weinberg
18:20 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
17:53 Re: Weird behavior in ivopts code Jeffrey A Law
17:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
17:49 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Denis Chertykov
17:49 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
17:49 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
17:18 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure Geert Bosch
16:03 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure Nick Burrett
15:41 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
15:27 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations? Uros Bizjak
15:22 Re: Ada and ARM build assertion failure Geert Bosch
14:35 Re: Extra gcc-3.3 java failures when using expect-5.43 Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:28 [autovect] Bootstrap failure on i686 Richard Guenther
14:24 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations? Richard Guenther
14:14 Re: GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations? Uros Bizjak
14:00 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Richard Guenther
13:56 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Dorit Naishlos
13:53 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Dorit Naishlos
13:53 Re: Specifying alignment of pointer targets Richard Guenther
13:29 Specifying alignment of pointer targets Richard Guenther
12:55 Re: Useless vectorization of small loops Richard Guenther
12:45 Useless vectorization of small loops Richard Guenther
12:32 GCC no longer synthesizing v2sf operations from v4sf operations? Richard Guenther
11:43 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
07:55 Ada and ARM build assertion failure Nick Burrett
03:21 Extra gcc-3.3 java failures when using expect-5.43 Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:29 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Richard Henderson
00:12 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz

March 20, 2005
21:01 PL/I Frontend for GCC version 0.0.10 released Henrik Sorensen
20:14 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Kenner
19:50 Re: reload-branch created Ulrich Weigand
19:41 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Zdenek Dvorak
19:36 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Richard Henderson
19:27 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Kenner
19:26 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Richard Henderson
18:41 Re: reload-branch created Bernd Schmidt
18:09 gcc-4.1-20050320 is now available gccadmin
17:41 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
17:06 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
16:00 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Richard Henderson
15:46 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Henderson
15:41 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Zdenek Dvorak
15:35 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3 Rajesh Babu
15:19 Re: [AVR] RTL prologue/epilogue Björn Haase
15:12 Re: reload-branch created Toon Moene
13:20 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Kenner
10:55 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
10:36 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Arnaud Charlet
04:44 [AVR] RTL prologue/epilogue HutchinsonAndy
03:30 Re: For those who want to automatically generate predicates.md... Bob Wilson
02:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
02:40 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
02:32 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Brook
01:59 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Giovanni Bajo
01:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
00:52 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Geert Bosch

March 19, 2005
23:41 gcc-4.0-20050319 is now available gccadmin
23:38 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
23:16 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
23:14 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
22:06 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
21:38 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
20:59 Re: Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Zdenek Dvorak
20:52 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
20:10 Re: converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Laurent GUERBY
20:10 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
19:52 converting Ada to handle USE_MAPPED_LOCATION Per Bothner
19:01 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
18:51 Re: AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Paul Schlie
18:20 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Björn Haase
17:51 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
17:08 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
16:53 AVR indirect_jump addresses limited to 16 bits Marek Michalkiewicz
15:23 Copyright question: libgcc GPL exceptions Bernd Schmidt
13:34 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
13:34 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
13:15 Build and test results: gcc-3.4.3 on Red Hat 8.0 Anna Aret
13:14 Re: gcc 3.4.3 bug C++/inlines/thumb Paul Brook
12:22 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Vincent Lefevre
12:13 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" Thorsten Glaser
09:49 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion Björn Haase
07:51 gcc 3.4.3 bug C++/inlines/thumb Carl van_Schaik
07:33 Re: reload-branch created Bernd Schmidt
01:23 Re: reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0) Giovanni Bajo
00:44 Re: reload-branch created Ulrich Weigand
00:16 Question on tree-ssa-loop-im.c:for_each_index Richard Kenner
00:04 gcc-3.4-20050318 is now available gccadmin

March 18, 2005
23:48 Re: CC0 to CCmode conversion Bernardo Innocenti
23:38 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
23:19 Re: Problem running optimized IA64 code that invokes hand-codedassembly language function Andreas Schwab
23:00 Re: Overriding optimization for individual portions of C code Joe Buck
22:46 Overriding optimization for individual portions of C code JCA
22:35 Problem running optimized IA64 code that invokes hand-coded assembly language function JCA
20:38 Re: help with mudflap testsuite result analysis Frank Ch. Eigler
20:38 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
20:19 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Paul Schlie
20:02 Re: Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline Janis Johnson
19:21 Re: help with mudflap testsuite result analysis Mike Stump
18:16 reload-branch created (was: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0) Bernd Schmidt
17:25 Re: Weird behavior in ivopts code Zdenek Dvorak
16:56 Re: AVR: CC0 to CCmode conversion Paul Schlie
16:55 Weird behavior in ivopts code Jeffrey A Law
16:21 Re: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 for gcc 4.0.0 20050318 (prerelease) on sparc-linux Christian Joensson
16:10 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/20011119-2.c -O1 for gcc 4.0.0 20050318 (prerelease) on sparc-linux Christian Joensson
15:53 CC0 to CCmode conversion Denis Chertykov
14:04 Re: Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline Michael Matz
13:52 Strange build errors compiling SPEC with mainline Diego Novillo
13:01 Merge to tree-profiling Jan Hubicka
12:27 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
12:24 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
11:08 Re: reload question Miles Bader
10:35 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Mostafa Hagog
10:34 Re: help regarding ld Nick Clifton
10:03 Re: Known regression ? gcc-4.0.0-20050312 FPE's on C++ Giovanni Bajo
09:59 help regarding ld aram bharathi
09:55 Known regression ? gcc-4.0.0-20050312 FPE's on C++ John Vickers
06:14 Re: reload question Miles Bader
05:52 Re: RTL? James E Wilson
05:44 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 James E Wilson
05:36 Re: supporting --with-cpu=default32 option for x86_64 James E Wilson
05:33 Re: false spam positive from gcc-patches Steve Kargl
05:21 Re: false spam positive from gcc-patches James E Wilson
02:23 Re: short int and conversions Paul Schlie
02:17 Re: RFC: Changes in the representation of call clobbers Andrew MacLeod
00:26 Re: short int and conversions Andrea

March 17, 2005
23:21 Re: coverage mismatch Mike Stump
23:16 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
23:16 coverage mismatch Rajkishore Barik
23:01 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
22:51 re: problems compiling gcc-3.3.1 Daniel Kegel
21:47 Re: libgcc-std.ver question Mike Stump
20:53 Re: GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Stefan Strasser
20:47 false spam positive from gcc-patches Thomas Koenig
20:22 Re: Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700fix. Jeff Johnston
19:51 For those who want to automatically generate predicates.md... Kazu Hirata
19:37 help with mudflap testsuite result analysis Mike Stump
17:54 GCC3 to GCC4 performance regression. Bug? Steve Ellcey
17:45 Re: short int and conversions Joseph S. Myers
17:25 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Joe Buck
16:59 short int and conversions Andrea
15:52 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
14:40 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
14:36 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
14:02 Re: Questions about trampolines Clifford Wolf
13:36 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
13:26 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why? Jonathan Wakely
13:21 problems compiling gcc-3.3.1 Amit Thakar
12:27 Re: libgcc-std.ver question Richard Henderson
12:14 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:08 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why? Jonathan Wakely
10:04 Re: Compiler chokes on a simple template - why? Giovanni Bajo
09:32 Re: Questions about trampolines Clifford Wolf
09:09 Re: Bootstrap failure in varasm.c at assemble_alias Andreas Schwab
08:34 Compiler chokes on a simple template - why? Topi Maenpaa
08:31 Re: Question about how to compile multiple files with g++ Mike Stump
08:11 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
07:05 Question about how to compile multiple files with g++ Yen
05:17 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
02:34 Re: Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700 fix. Giovanni Bajo
02:02 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Ken Raeburn
01:46 Newlib _ctype_ alias kludge now invalid due to PR middle-end/15700 fix. Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:43 libgcc-std.ver question Mike Stump

March 16, 2005
23:59 RE: bootstrap 4.0-200503005: flag_unsafe_math_optimizations undeclared Jason Mancini
23:41 supporting --with-cpu=default32 option for x86_64 Nitin Gupta
23:30 bootstrap 4.0-200503005: flag_unsafe_math_optimizations undeclared Jason Mancini
23:26 gcc-3.3-20050316 is now available gccadmin
23:26 Bootstrap failure in varasm.c at assemble_alias Benjamin Redelings I
22:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Joseph S. Myers
22:02 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
21:58 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey
21:49 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Gabriel Dos Reis
21:37 SVN repo updated Daniel Berlin
20:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Joseph S. Myers
19:54 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
19:49 Re: Questions about trampolines Robert Dewar
19:44 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey
18:31 RE: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Dave Korn
17:57 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Gabriel Dos Reis
17:54 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
17:47 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Joe Buck
17:42 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Mostafa Hagog
17:41 Re: using test suite outside of build directory Mike Stump
17:34 Re: __builtin_cpow((0,0),(0,0)) Ronny Peine
17:32 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 E. Weddington
17:24 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Richard Kenner
16:57 using test suite outside of build directory Jack Howarth
16:25 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
16:25 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
16:22 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Richard Stallman
16:19 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Steven Bosscher
16:11 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Mostafa Hagog
16:07 Re: Installation into 'const' directory Michael Matz
15:59 Re: request for timings - makedepend Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:54 [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF Ted Teah via RT
15:26 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
15:21 Re: Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Richard Kenner
15:17 Suggestion for a fix to Bug middle-end/20177 Mostafa Hagog
15:03 Installation into 'const' directory Art Haas
14:58 Re: Questions about trampolines Jonathan Wakely
14:49 RE: Questions about trampolines Manuel Baez
14:33 Re: Questions about trampolines Clifford Wolf
13:50 Re: Questions about trampolines Joern RENNECKE
13:38 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Daniel Berlin
11:41 Re: reload question Bernd Schmidt
11:38 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Gabriel Dos Reis
11:37 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Gabriel Dos Reis
10:43 Re: Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically? Jonathan Wakely
10:33 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Dorit Naishlos
10:08 Re: Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically? Giovanni Bajo
09:37 Re: [gnu.org #222786] GCC Testsuite Tests Exclude List Contribution to FSF M Ranga Swami Reddy via RT
09:34 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Paolo Carlini
08:45 Why aren't assignment operators inherited automatically? Topi Maenpaa
07:20 Re: [Ada] Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050315 on sparc-linux: a-except.adb: unhandled expression in get_expr_operands(): Eric Botcazou
05:34 reload question Miles Bader
05:25 RE: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Gary Funck
05:24 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
05:19 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
05:10 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
04:45 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Zack Weinberg
04:44 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Daniel Berlin
04:42 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Daniel Berlin
04:31 RTL? "하태준"
03:57 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
03:38 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Benjamin Kosnik
03:15 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! Joe Buck
02:23 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!! jc-nospam
02:21 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!. Richard Kenner
02:00 Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!. Joe Buck
01:52 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Giovanni Bajo
01:44 Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!. jc-nospam
01:40 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support David Edelsohn
01:33 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Miles Bader
01:15 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Andrew Pinski
01:01 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Paolo Carlini
00:50 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Andrew Pinski
00:48 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
00:44 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Joe Buck
00:42 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey
00:35 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Paolo Carlini
00:31 Re: Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Geoffrey Keating
00:24 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Mark Mitchell
00:17 Libstdc++-v3 vs darwin vs weak support Paolo Carlini
00:14 Re: PR 19893 & array_ref bug Steve Ellcey

March 15, 2005
22:55 Re: a problem about cross-compile for powerpc James E Wilson
22:24 Re: PR 20225 Benjamin Redelings I
22:22 [Ada] Can't build gcc cvs trunk 20050315 on sparc-linux: a-except.adb: unhandled expression in get_expr_operands(): Christian Joensson
22:13 Re: PRE in GCC-3.3.3 James E Wilson
22:06 Re: Root Node of AST James E Wilson
21:36 Re: `make uninstall' and GCC James E Wilson
20:13 Re: Question about "#pragma pack(n)" and "-fpack-struct" James E Wilson
19:54 Re: Merging calls to `abort' Alexandre Oliva
19:51