This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build

From: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel dot crashing dot org>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
Date: 28 Feb 2005 10:44:30 -0800
Subject: Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
References: <1109545242.14992.234.camel@gaston> <200502272335.j1RNZDD27844@makai.watson.ibm.com> <653d1ad4308fa0e72f08252032f6c753@physics.uc.edu> <1109548140.15027.239.camel@gaston> <200502272356.j1RNuBD31238@makai.watson.ibm.com> <1109549756.15027.245.camel@gaston>

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> writes:

> Unless -mcpu=POWER8 -mno-altivec -maltivec is legal ...

Yes, a later -msomething will override a previous -mno-something.

References:
- Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: Implicit altivec vs. linux kernel build
  - From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]