This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1 Projects

From: Devang Patel <dpatel at apple dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:50:58 -0800
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
References: <42225041.2070308@codesourcery.com> <20050227233821.GA23540@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1109548747.28205.4.camel@linux.site>

On Feb 27, 2005, at 3:59 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:

In stark contrast, i believe it is a very good idea for us to be "over
organized" about this.  As for judging importance, the release manager
has always judged what is important for a given release, based on
general goals.

I agree. IMO taking one more step in the same direction is also a good idea. And next step would be: _any_ big patch needs proposal on public list in advance at any stage of release cycle.

-
Devang

References:
- Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: GCC 4.1 Projects
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]