This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>,mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:28:58 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
Organization: SuSE Linux AG
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502241350470.2297-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <84fc9c000502241145430b46ba@mail.gmail.com> <20050226220311.GB24289@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <200502262327.14706.stevenb@suse.de> <42211C93.4040801@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>

On Feb 27, 2005 02:04 AM, Richard Guenther <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
> In the end we surely want to watch CiSBE and SPEC testers.

Maybe so, but your timings already show this is pretty unacceptable.

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

References:
- Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]