This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, mark at codesourcery dot com, Richard Guenther <rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:27:14 +0100
Subject: Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
Organization: SUSE Labs
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502241350470.2297-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <84fc9c000502241145430b46ba@mail.gmail.com> <20050226220311.GB24289@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Saturday 26 February 2005 23:03, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Mark?  I would say that there is little risk in this patch corectness
> wise, might have negative effect on compilation times since we re-start
> inlining more like we did in old days.

Can we see some timings with and without this patch?

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: Inlining and estimate_num_insns
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]