This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: objc_msgSend efficiency patch


Dale Johannesen wrote:

OK, thanks. I can look into doing this in the ObjC-specific hook, unless you have
a better idea?

I've looked harder.


See PR19148 for details about my patch. I think the key is that you not recursively call gimplify_expr with fb_lvalue. Since we're calling recursively with fb_rvalue that particular case is probably OK.

But, I'm not sure that C++ would never put a postincrement in there in a way that would screw things up. I don't think that performance of unoptimized code in Objective-C is a worthwhile benefit in Stage 3 when measured against the risk of wrong code in C++. So, it seems to me that this should probably be done as a special case in the Objective-C front end, if it makes sense there. Or, someone who knows more than I should state definitively that the problematic case cannot appear in any language using OBJ_TYPE_REF, and then modify the OBJ_TYPE_REF documentation to indicate that.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]