This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Major regression on mainline


On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 05:16:29PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> 
> On Feb 18, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:59:00PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> >>I suspect that the problem is that the transformations 
> >>fold_indirect_ref_1
> >>is doing on arrays don't mix well with how fortran handles arrays.
> >
> >I have been trying to look at the problem in the BLAS sources,
> >and I find it hard to debug because it goes away when print
> >statements are added to the source (I hate that...)
> >
> 
> Wasn't this fixed by my patch which I applied this morning:
> 
> 2005-02-18  Andrew Pinski  <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
> 
>         PR middle-end/20030
>         * fold-const.c (fold_indirect_ref_1): Use the correct index for 
> zero access,
>         the lower bound of the array type if it exists.
> 

Yes, your patch fixed the problem.

-- 
Steve


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]