This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Details for svn test repository
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
- Cc: Nathanael Nerode <neroden at twcny dot rr dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 21:53:13 -0500
- Subject: Re: Details for svn test repository
- References: <6BAEDC68-7C9F-11D9-91B2-003065BDF310@apple.com>
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 18:40 -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Friday, February 11, 2005, at 05:29 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > I'll keep the last branchpoint of each branch for the initial import
>
> Won't work either... Sometimes we reuses merge labels in non-obvious
> ways. top-200501-merge and top-200502-merge both exist, the two were
> used for, say, treeprofiling, and then a random other (important)
> branch uses the first for its merge.
>
> Also, even if you could track those down (you can't), it still would
> obliterate merge auditing, which is a very useful feature to find how
> exactly how someone screwed up a past merge.
>
> I don't see the advantage of wiping those labels yet.
>
> If you left all labels mentioned in any log entry, that would almost
> solve most instances that I know about, but, sometimes people misspell
> the tags in obvious ways in the log messages.
>
Fine, i'll just keep all the non-snapshot tags for now.