This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Tom Schutter <tom at platte dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:21:42 +0100
- Subject: Re: Why is this diagnostic only reported with -pedantic?
- References: <1107990381.29923.6.camel@rota.bou.platte.com>
Tom Schutter <tom@platte.com> writes:
> In my opinion, the problem in baz() is just as bad as the problem in
> foo().
Why do you think so? What can go wrong this way (apart from being less
portable)?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."