This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Walter Landry <wlandry at ucsd dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:12:51 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
References: <20050207.204158.97296005.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <1107829810.5766.36.camel@linux.site> <1107830065.5766.37.camel@linux.site>

On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>> As for creation of experimental throw-away branches, the idea that you
>> need a distributed vcs for that to work is just BS :).  We have had 796
>> branches (according to the repo statistics) in the gcc cvs repository,
>> over the course of 7 years.
> Sorry, I typo'd the number. it's 976.

How did you arrive at this number?  That sounds like an order of magnitude 
too many branches -- have you counted (snapshot) tags as well?

Gerald

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Walter Landry
- Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]