This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Moving to an alternate VCS

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Walter Landry <wlandry at ucsd dot edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:53:15 +0100
Subject: Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
Organization: SUSE Labs
References: <20050207.204158.97296005.wlandry@ucsd.edu> <1107829810.5766.36.camel@linux.site> <20050207.231803.78701691.wlandry@ucsd.edu>

On Tuesday 08 February 2005 05:18, Walter Landry wrote:
> > We don't want a distributed system right now.
>
> You can close your eyes and pretend it isn't there.

We want something that works similar to, but better than CVS.  It has
been explained several times now on the list why we prefer a CVS-like
solution.  You seem to think that the world is a better place if
everyone goes to a distributed model.  We think we are working just
fine now without a distribited SCM system.  You are commiting the 11th
Deadly Sin for a compiler writer (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/DeadlySins ;-)

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler
- Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Mike Stump

References:
- Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Walter Landry
- Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
  - From: Walter Landry

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]