This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Moving to an alternate VCS
- From: "Bennett, Patrick" <Patrick dot Bennett at inin dot com>
- To: "Lars Segerlund" <lars dot segerlund at comsys dot se>,<gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:55:16 -0500
- Subject: RE: Moving to an alternate VCS
If GCC will never use anything but 'free' software, it's kind of
pointless to discuss pros/cons of other solutions, but it's easy enough
to dig up information on the net if you're curious.
You can email me privately if you want to chat about it.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf
Of
> Lars Segerlund
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 3:31 AM
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Moving to an alternate VCS
>
>
> Now do you have substantial subverson/svk experience also ? In other
> words,
> what can perforce do that subversion don't ?
>
> Just qurious :-) / Lars Segerlund.
>
> On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:19:49 -0500
> Patrick Bennett <patrick.bennett@inin.com> wrote:
>
> > I suppose it was just wishful thinking, but I kind of expected to
hear
> that.
> > It's unfortunate though, since Perforce is a heck of a VCS. :(
> >
> > Cheers...
> > Patrick Bennett
> >
> > Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > > But since GCC is a FSF project ... it really cannot use non free
> > > source software.
> >
> >
> >