This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite

From: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind dot harboe at zylin dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:05:34 +0100
Subject: Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
References: <1106809926.16613.40.camel@famine> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0501271130020.21866@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 11:31 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-1] Øyvind Harboe wrote:
> 
> > It also seems a bit strange that libgloss defines longjmp/setjmp if
> > there is a __builtin_setjmp/longjmp() in GCC.
> 
> __builtin_setjmp / __builtin_longjmp don't correspond to the C setjmp / 
> longjmp unlike other built-in functions, they are only there for internal 
> use.

I see.

What about a test case in the testsuite for setjmp/longjmp()?

Is there a reason why it has been omitted?

-- 
Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
  - From: Mike Stump

References:
- setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
  - From: Øyvind Harboe
- Re: setjmp/longtjmp missing from the execute testsuite
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]