This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: Benjamin Redelings <bredelin at ucla dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Jan 2005 19:29:16 +0100
- Subject: Re: 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <41F688E1.email@example.com><46F1AD1B-6EFB-11D9-AEA7-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu>
Andrew Pinski <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| On Jan 25, 2005, at 12:58 PM, Benjamin Redelings wrote:
| > Hello,
| > I'm testing 4.0 snapshot 2005-01-15 by trying to compile my
| > program. I get error messages like the following a few times:
| > 'SR.1419' is used uninitialized in this function...
| > I'm guessing that this is an SSA name and should not be reported to
| > the user. Is this a known bug? Should I file a PR?
| Yes it is known but it is most likely a bug in your code.
| The problem is that SR.1419 should really be named
Not really. I've already filled a PR (which I think you quickly
closed) where SR.xxxx should have been A::i (where A is a base
class). I wanted to fix this by using DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN but RTH
thinks that is not appropriate. Anyhow, we need to put a back
reference to the original tree that was SRAed.