This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: fold_builtin_memcpy cannot optimize <retval>?
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Jan 21, 2005, at 2:37 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
I'm not sure. I seemed to believe in that thread that they could
never be NULL, but I'm not sure if everyone agreed, and I see that we
suggested a non-NULL tag on objects somewhere. So, in that case,
there may be no difference at all to the middle-end. In any case, I
think that it would make sense for us to allow a REFERENCE_TYPE
anywhere we allow a POINTER_TYPE.
Isn't this valid C++ then (or is it just undefined):
It's undefined. You dereferenced a NULL pointer.