This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Matt Austern wrote:Consider the following code sample: struct A { }; typedef struct A A; struct A a; // [1] struct wrapper { struct B { }; typedef struct B B; struct B b; // [2] };
Where I'm having trouble: why don't we get the same error in [1]? I've searched in vain for any hint that the two cases should be treated differently.
I haven't searched the standard, but that looks like it should be an error to me. I bet that it's merely an accident of G++'s far-too-many different ways of keeping track of declarations; classes are different from namespaces...
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |