This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer dot com>
Cc: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 11:54:53 -0800
Subject: Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0501171315440.16464-100000@alwazn.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> <D01A0DD8-689F-11D9-B0FF-000A95D692F4@physics.uc.edu> <051f01c4fcbc$19fe1670$bf03030a@trilan> <84fc9c00050118013035b4bb66@mail.gmail.com> <028501c4fd71$dd80bcf0$f503030a@trilan> <41ED67A2.30606@codesourcery.com> <069801c4fd97$1f419fe0$f503030a@trilan>

Giovanni Bajo wrote:

Actually, to clarify, only within the member initialization list of Foo's
constructor, where you can explicitally call the const member's constructor.
After that, the body of the construct of Foo is no different from other
member functions, in that it cannot modify the const member's contents.

Correct.

--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

Follow-Ups:
- Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: -funswitch-loops not effective?
  - From: Giovanni Bajo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]