This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

It seems like this controversy will never go away.

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Toon Moene [] 
	Sent: Fri 01/14/2005 03:26 PM 
	To: Bernd Schmidt 
	Cc:; Steven Bosscher; Jan Vroonhof; Daniel Berlin;; BjÃrn Haase 
	Subject: Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

	Bernd Schmidt wrote:
	> Jeffrey A Law wrote:
	>> If reload is going to hang around (and I suspect it will), I'd love to
	>> see those two areas improved.  I can't express how difficult I find
	>> it to analyze the reload inheritance code.  Reload ordering is only
	>> mildly easier to understand.
	> I'm attaching a proof-of-concept patch, against a checkout from
	> 20050106.  The main things this patch does
	I meant to reply to Bernd earlier that I would really, really like his
	patch, if for nothing else than that it would simplify reload[1].c so as
	to make it more easily replaceable.  Bernd has shown in the past that he
	knows his way around reload, so I would appreciate if this patch could
	be hammered into something that might be useful (if only in 4.1).
	Toon Moene - e-mail: - phone: +31 346 214290
	Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
	Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77:
	A maintainer of GNU Fortran 95:

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]