I think I understood what You want.(Was:Re: New logo gone vectorised.(SVG format))

[Vladius <boxforsr at inbox dot ru>]

Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote:

> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>  
>
> > The hypothetical new logo should represent the compiler.  It should
> > ideally represent what the compiler does, and what it aspires to do,
> > albeit perhaps in highly symbolized form.  It should be recognizable,
> > look good in several different sizes on computer screens, look good in
> > black and white, look good on a T-shirt or a book cover.  It should
> > inspire people and give them confidence.  It should feed the hungry
> > and create world peace.  It should be only 1K.  That is what I would
> > like to see in a logo.
> >    
>
> Anyone interested in designing a logo for an open source, community
> project should check out what Boost is doing right now.  They are
> replacing their old, fairly unrecognizable logo with a new one, and
> recently theres been tons of discussion on what the new one should be:
> <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl?BoostLogo>.
>
> The Boost mailing list archives contain all sorts of very useful
> information for anyone interested in creating a successful logo (search
> for logo).  Besides some very valuable informations, theres a whole lot
> of nonsense, and a whole lot of excellent examples of why most
> organizations don't let computer scientists and engineers design logos
> in the first place.
>
> Aaron W. LaFramboise
>  
   Ough, that what You've meant. I think I can do like that easily. 
Here. A small logo of GCC. The process of  turning abstract thoughts 
into sctrict machine code is shown. I can make more if someone would 
like me to.