This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

From: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:05:56 +0100
Subject: Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
Organization: SUSE Labs
References: <10501070252.AA12647@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0501062206420.16037@dberlin.org>

On Friday 07 January 2005 04:09, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> This is what pre-reload does on new-ra, but it ends up looking just like
> reload.

That is in part because pre-reload is just poorly engineered.  There is
no a good reason for this AFAICT.  A cleaner pre-reload pass should be
possible if you don't start with "cp reload.c pre-reload.c" ;-)

Gr.
Steven

References:
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]