This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [i386] Why g++ _always_ link an executable with libm.so?
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 05:16:20PM -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Jan 5, 2005, at 5:09 PM, Denis Zaitsev wrote:
> > Ok. But the question in general is not about that. It is not a
> > problem that libm is NEEDED by libstdc++, but why this NEEDED leads to
> > the same NEEDED for the app? Isn't the first depndency enough?
> No, because some of libstdc++ code is in the headers, on some targets
> have two level namespaces which causes this to be rejected.
Sorry, what to be rejected?