This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>
Cc: Jan Vroonhof <jvlists at ntlworld dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, BjÃrn Haase <Bjoern dot M dot Haase at web dot de>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 10:46:53 -0500
Subject: Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
References: <1238991885@web.de> <200501021628.00741.paul@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.60.0501021135040.8214@dberlin.org> <g3brc5lb13.fsf@bart.isltd.insignia.com> <209087.1104838490804.SLOX.WebMail.wwwrun@extimap.suse.de>

	If one cannot assign registers, the next important decisions are
what, how, and where to spill.  new-ra focussed on optimal choice of
registers, but did not pay enough attention to register spilling.

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Daniel Berlin

References:
- What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Bj=F6rn=20Haase
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Jan Vroonhof
- Re: What to do with new-ra for GCC 4.0
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]